From patchwork Sat Jun 24 17:17:54 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lucas De Marchi X-Patchwork-Id: 13291698 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66505EB64DA for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D2610E1B6; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:18:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19DF310E059; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1687627080; x=1719163080; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BK2i3uF8Mp1d8mtepKV6VDyQ8iqxwT8putwYzVYSo2k=; b=A2hlGKPOj0iT0sLPz9w2ekgXrJYJ+MG8OjZOh+VWzqkCVs+gY/aZj1Yl qLZ4s57EJs3ZvUtZwcyVmoH0ROqks9fwXjNVNotvYOZJQYFbLXLMWPp99 MCnXyBVAcrSwEqJRPqGL/WgDjcmzcKyauZPZbza7pT0lM4pydIvUkSyj3 rM5/xbl1cvCZVb1UNIWZL6z1IOYiTZnTOa2QZMd/Y/YcxiaSnpTK6TQV+ OLxWR4NJ5oX4FEtrEyX7+ptgiTfI6si6ayzHUP35X6yBYobKwZf1gUuuP a7+bBFMcuKdZETQWcgefrSQuVQh0SlEieqIDlwtoupyB1aFG/x9hLNNqs Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10751"; a="340557472" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,155,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="340557472" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2023 10:17:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10751"; a="1045977421" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,155,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="1045977421" Received: from lucas-s2600cw.jf.intel.com ([10.165.21.196]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Jun 2023 10:17:59 -0700 From: Lucas De Marchi To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 10:17:54 -0700 Message-Id: <20230624171757.3906095-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230624171757.3906095-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> References: <20230624171757.3906095-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/6] drm/i915/gt: Fix context workarounds with non-masked regs X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Lucas De Marchi , Kenneth Graunke , Matt Roper , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" Most of the context workarounds tweak masked registers, but not all. For masked registers, when writing the value it's sufficient to just write the wa->set_bits since that will take care of both the clr and set bits as well as not overwriting other bits. However there are some workarounds, the registers are non-masked. Up until now the driver was simply emitting a MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM with the set_bits to program the register via the GPU in the WA bb. This has the side effect of overwriting the content of the register outside of bits that should be set and also doesn't handle the bits that should be cleared. Kenneth reported that on DG2, mesa was seeing a weird behavior due to the kernel programming of L3SQCREG5 in dg2_ctx_gt_tuning_init(). With the GPU idle, that register could be read via intel_reg as 0x00e001ff, but during a 3D workload it would change to 0x0000007f. So the programming of that tuning was affecting more than the bits in L3_PWM_TIMER_INIT_VAL_MASK. Matt Roper noticed the lack of rmw for the context workarounds due to the use of MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM. So, for registers that are not masked, read its value via mmio, modify and then set it in the buffer to be written by the GPU. This should take care in a simple way of programming just the bits required by the tuning/workaround. If in future there are registers that involved that can't be read by the CPU, a more complex approach may be required like a) issuing additional instructions to read and modify; or b) scan the golden context and patch it in place before saving it; or something else. But for now this should suffice. Scanning the context workarounds for all platforms, these are the impacted ones with the respective registers mtl: DRAW_WATERMARK mtl/dg2: XEHP_L3SQCREG5, XEHP_FF_MODE2 ICL has some non-masked registers in the context workarounds: GEN8_L3CNTLREG, IVB_FBC_RT_BASE and VB_FBC_RT_BASE_UPPER, but there shouldn't be an impact. The first is already being manually read and the other 2 are intentionally overwriting the entire register. Same reasoning applies to GEN12_FF_MODE2: the WA is intentionally overwriting all the bits to avoid a read-modify-write. v2: Reword commit message wrt GEN12_FF_MODE2 and the changed behavior on preparatory patches. Cc: Kenneth Graunke Cc: Matt Roper Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/23783#note_1968971 Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c index 7d48bd57b6ef..9291c2b4ca0e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c @@ -986,6 +986,9 @@ void intel_engine_init_ctx_wa(struct intel_engine_cs *engine) int intel_engine_emit_ctx_wa(struct i915_request *rq) { struct i915_wa_list *wal = &rq->engine->ctx_wa_list; + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rq->engine->uncore; + enum forcewake_domains fw; + unsigned long flags; struct i915_wa *wa; unsigned int i; u32 *cs; @@ -1002,13 +1005,35 @@ int intel_engine_emit_ctx_wa(struct i915_request *rq) if (IS_ERR(cs)) return PTR_ERR(cs); + fw = wal_get_fw_for_rmw(uncore, wal); + + intel_gt_mcr_lock(wal->gt, &flags); + spin_lock(&uncore->lock); + intel_uncore_forcewake_get__locked(uncore, fw); + *cs++ = MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM(wal->count); for (i = 0, wa = wal->list; i < wal->count; i++, wa++) { + u32 val; + + if (wa->masked_reg || wa->set == U32_MAX) { + val = wa->set; + } else { + val = wa->is_mcr ? + intel_gt_mcr_read_any_fw(wal->gt, wa->mcr_reg) : + intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, wa->reg); + val &= ~wa->clr; + val |= wa->set; + } + *cs++ = i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa->reg); - *cs++ = wa->set; + *cs++ = val; } *cs++ = MI_NOOP; + intel_uncore_forcewake_put__locked(uncore, fw); + spin_unlock(&uncore->lock); + intel_gt_mcr_unlock(wal->gt, flags); + intel_ring_advance(rq, cs); ret = rq->engine->emit_flush(rq, EMIT_BARRIER);