Message ID | 20230707232359.81039-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [i-g-t] i915_pm_freq_api: Add some debug to tests | expand |
On Fri, 07 Jul 2023 16:23:59 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > > Some subtests seem to be failing in CI, use igt_assert_(lt/eq) which > print the values being compared and some additional debug as well. > > Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> > --- > tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 18 ++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c > index 522abee35..cdb2e70ca 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt) > rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ); > rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ); > rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ); > + igt_debug("RPn: %d, RPe: %d, RP0: %d", rpn, rpe, rp0); Print gt here too. > > /* > * Negative bound tests > @@ -90,21 +91,18 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count) > int fd; > > for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { > - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, > - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); > - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, > - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); > + igt_debug("Running cycle: %d", i); > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); > + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); > usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); > - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, > - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); > + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); > > /* Manually trigger a GT reset */ > fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY); > igt_require(fd >= 0); > igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2)); > > - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, > - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); > + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); Probably ok but why the changes in this loop? > } > close(fd); > } > @@ -116,13 +114,13 @@ static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt) > igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); > igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); > usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); > - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); > + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); > > /* Manually trigger a suspend */ > igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3, > SUSPEND_TEST_NONE); > > - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); > + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); > } > > int i915 = -1; > -- > 2.38.1 >
On 7/8/2023 12:36 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jul 2023 16:23:59 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: >> Some subtests seem to be failing in CI, use igt_assert_(lt/eq) which >> print the values being compared and some additional debug as well. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> >> --- >> tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 18 ++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c >> index 522abee35..cdb2e70ca 100644 >> --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c >> +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c >> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt) >> rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ); >> rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ); >> rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ); >> + igt_debug("RPn: %d, RPe: %d, RP0: %d", rpn, rpe, rp0); > Print gt here too. ok. > >> /* >> * Negative bound tests >> @@ -90,21 +91,18 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count) >> int fd; >> >> for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { >> - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, >> - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); >> - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, >> - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); >> + igt_debug("Running cycle: %d", i); >> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); >> + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); >> usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); >> - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, >> - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); >> + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); >> >> /* Manually trigger a GT reset */ >> fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY); >> igt_require(fd >= 0); >> igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2)); >> >> - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, >> - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); >> + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); > Probably ok but why the changes in this loop? There are a couple of bugs that are failing around this area. Thanks, Vinay. > >> } >> close(fd); >> } >> @@ -116,13 +114,13 @@ static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt) >> igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); >> igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); >> usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); >> - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); >> + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); >> >> /* Manually trigger a suspend */ >> igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3, >> SUSPEND_TEST_NONE); >> >> - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); >> + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); >> } >> >> int i915 = -1; >> -- >> 2.38.1 >>
diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c index 522abee35..cdb2e70ca 100644 --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ static void test_freq_basic_api(int dirfd, int gt) rpn = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RPn_FREQ_MHZ); rp0 = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP0_FREQ_MHZ); rpe = get_freq(dirfd, RPS_RP1_FREQ_MHZ); + igt_debug("RPn: %d, RPe: %d, RP0: %d", rpn, rpe, rp0); /* * Negative bound tests @@ -90,21 +91,18 @@ static void test_reset(int i915, int dirfd, int gt, int count) int fd; for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); - igt_assert_f(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0, - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); + igt_debug("Running cycle: %d", i); + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); + igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); /* Manually trigger a GT reset */ fd = igt_debugfs_gt_open(i915, gt, "reset", O_WRONLY); igt_require(fd >= 0); igt_ignore_warn(write(fd, "1\n", 2)); - igt_assert_f(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn, - "Failed after %d good cycles\n", i); + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); } close(fd); } @@ -116,13 +114,13 @@ static void test_suspend(int i915, int dirfd, int gt) igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MIN_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); igt_assert(set_freq(dirfd, RPS_MAX_FREQ_MHZ, rpn) > 0); usleep(ACT_FREQ_LATENCY_US); - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); /* Manually trigger a suspend */ igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_S3, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE); - igt_assert(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ) == rpn); + igt_assert_eq(get_freq(dirfd, RPS_CUR_FREQ_MHZ), rpn); } int i915 = -1;
Some subtests seem to be failing in CI, use igt_assert_(lt/eq) which print the values being compared and some additional debug as well. Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> --- tests/i915/i915_pm_freq_api.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)