Message ID | 20231023-wabb-v3-4-1a4fbc632440@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Apply Wa_16018031267 / Wa_16018063123 | expand |
Hi Andrzej, On 10/23/2023 9:41 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > From: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> > > Set copy engine arbitration into round robin mode > for part of Wa_16018031267 / Wa_16018063123 mitigation. > > Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h | 3 +++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 5 +++++ > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h > index b8618ee3e3041a..c0c8c12edea104 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h > @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ > #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c4) /* gen8+ */ > #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c8) /* gen8+ */ > #define ECOSKPD(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1d0) > +#define XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK REG_GENMASK(12, 11) > +#define XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE \ > + REG_FIELD_PREP(XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, 1) > #define ECO_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SR_DISABLE REG_BIT(4) > #define ECO_GATING_CX_ONLY REG_BIT(3) > #define GEN6_BLITTER_FBC_NOTIFY REG_BIT(3) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > index 192ac0e59afa13..108d9326735910 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c > @@ -2782,6 +2782,11 @@ xcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal) > RING_SEMA_WAIT_POLL(engine->mmio_base), > 1); > } > + /* Wa_16018031267, Wa_16018063123 */ > + if (NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB(engine)) Not sure if I missed any previous discussion on this, the WA talked about applying this on main copy engine. This needs to be taken into account in NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB() > + wa_masked_field_set(wal, ECOSKPD(engine->mmio_base), > + XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, > + XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE); > } This function sets masked_reg = true and will not read the register back and I remember MattR asked internally to not use that if that is not required. With those two concern handled this is Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> Regards, Nirmoy > > static void >
On 23.10.2023 11:55, Nirmoy Das wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > On 10/23/2023 9:41 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> From: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> >> >> Set copy engine arbitration into round robin mode >> for part of Wa_16018031267 / Wa_16018063123 mitigation. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> >> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h | 3 +++ >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 5 +++++ >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >> index b8618ee3e3041a..c0c8c12edea104 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >> @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ >> #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c4) /* >> gen8+ */ >> #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c8) >> /* gen8+ */ >> #define ECOSKPD(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1d0) >> +#define XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK REG_GENMASK(12, 11) >> +#define XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE \ >> + REG_FIELD_PREP(XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, 1) >> #define ECO_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SR_DISABLE REG_BIT(4) >> #define ECO_GATING_CX_ONLY REG_BIT(3) >> #define GEN6_BLITTER_FBC_NOTIFY REG_BIT(3) >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >> index 192ac0e59afa13..108d9326735910 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >> @@ -2782,6 +2782,11 @@ xcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs >> *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal) >> RING_SEMA_WAIT_POLL(engine->mmio_base), >> 1); >> } >> + /* Wa_16018031267, Wa_16018063123 */ >> + if (NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB(engine)) > > > Not sure if I missed any previous discussion on this, the WA talked > about applying this on main copy engine. This needs to be taken into > account in > > NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB() Do you mean we need to check if instance == 0? Now above macro checks if it is copy engine. > >> + wa_masked_field_set(wal, ECOSKPD(engine->mmio_base), >> + XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, >> + XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE); >> } > > This function sets masked_reg = true and will not read the register back > and I remember MattR asked internally to not use that if that is not > required. IIRC, wa_masked_field_set sets read_mask, so read back is performed, anyway it is the only function (beside low level wa_add), which works on fields(not bits). Are you sure? Regards Andrzej > > > With those two concern handled this is Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das > <nirmoy.das@intel.com> > > > Regards, > > Nirmoy > >> static void >>
On 10/23/2023 5:24 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 23.10.2023 11:55, Nirmoy Das wrote: >> Hi Andrzej, >> >> On 10/23/2023 9:41 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >>> From: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> >>> >>> Set copy engine arbitration into round robin mode >>> for part of Wa_16018031267 / Wa_16018063123 mitigation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@intel.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h | 3 +++ >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 5 +++++ >>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >>> index b8618ee3e3041a..c0c8c12edea104 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h >>> @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ >>> #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c4) >>> /* gen8+ */ >>> #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base) _MMIO((base) + >>> 0x1c8) /* gen8+ */ >>> #define ECOSKPD(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1d0) >>> +#define XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK REG_GENMASK(12, 11) >>> +#define XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE \ >>> + REG_FIELD_PREP(XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, 1) >>> #define ECO_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SR_DISABLE REG_BIT(4) >>> #define ECO_GATING_CX_ONLY REG_BIT(3) >>> #define GEN6_BLITTER_FBC_NOTIFY REG_BIT(3) >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >>> index 192ac0e59afa13..108d9326735910 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c >>> @@ -2782,6 +2782,11 @@ xcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs >>> *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal) >>> RING_SEMA_WAIT_POLL(engine->mmio_base), >>> 1); >>> } >>> + /* Wa_16018031267, Wa_16018063123 */ >>> + if (NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB(engine)) >> >> >> Not sure if I missed any previous discussion on this, the WA talked >> about applying this on main copy engine. This needs to be taken into >> account in >> >> NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB() > > Do you mean we need to check if instance == 0? Now above macro checks > if it is copy engine. Yes, The WA should be limited to BCS0. > > >> >>> + wa_masked_field_set(wal, ECOSKPD(engine->mmio_base), >>> + XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, >>> + XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE); >>> } >> >> This function sets masked_reg = true and will not read the register >> back and I remember MattR asked internally to not use that if that is >> not required. > > IIRC, wa_masked_field_set sets read_mask, so read back is performed, > anyway it is the only function (beside low level wa_add), which works > on fields(not bits). Are you sure? Yes, you are right. I misread something. Please ignore that comment. Regards, Nirmoy > > Regards > Andrzej > >> >> >> With those two concern handled this is Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das >> <nirmoy.das@intel.com> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Nirmoy >> >>> static void >>> >
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h index b8618ee3e3041a..c0c8c12edea104 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_regs.h @@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c4) /* gen8+ */ #define RING_INDIRECT_CTX_OFFSET(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1c8) /* gen8+ */ #define ECOSKPD(base) _MMIO((base) + 0x1d0) +#define XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK REG_GENMASK(12, 11) +#define XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE \ + REG_FIELD_PREP(XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, 1) #define ECO_CONSTANT_BUFFER_SR_DISABLE REG_BIT(4) #define ECO_GATING_CX_ONLY REG_BIT(3) #define GEN6_BLITTER_FBC_NOTIFY REG_BIT(3) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c index 192ac0e59afa13..108d9326735910 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c @@ -2782,6 +2782,11 @@ xcs_engine_wa_init(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct i915_wa_list *wal) RING_SEMA_WAIT_POLL(engine->mmio_base), 1); } + /* Wa_16018031267, Wa_16018063123 */ + if (NEEDS_FASTCOLOR_BLT_WABB(engine)) + wa_masked_field_set(wal, ECOSKPD(engine->mmio_base), + XEHP_BLITTER_SCHEDULING_MODE_MASK, + XEHP_BLITTER_ROUND_ROBIN_MODE); } static void