[01/10] drm/i915: Use preempt_disable/enable_rt() where recommended

Commit Message

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior April 5, 2024, 2:18 p.m. UTC

From: Mike Galbraith <[e-mail]>

Mario Kleiner suggest in commit
  ad3543ede630f ("drm/intel: Push get_scanout_position() timestamping into kms driver.")

a spots where preemption should be disabled on PREEMPT_RT. The
difference is that on PREEMPT_RT the intel_uncore::lock disables neither
preemption nor interrupts and so region remains preemptible.

The area covers only register reads and writes. The part that worries me
is:
- __intel_get_crtc_scanline() the worst case is 100us if no match is
  found.

- intel_crtc_scanlines_since_frame_timestamp() not sure how long this
  may take in the worst case.

It was in the RT queue for a while and nobody complained.
Disable preemption on PREEPMPT_RT during timestamping.

[bigeasy: patch description.]

Cc: Mario Kleiner <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c | 38 +++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
index baf7354cb6e2c..71d6071121460 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vblank.c
@@ -276,6 +276,26 @@  int intel_crtc_scanline_to_hw(struct intel_crtc *crtc, int scanline)
  * all register accesses to the same cacheline to be serialized,
  * otherwise they may hang.
  */
+static void intel_vblank_section_enter_irqsave(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned long *flags)
+	__acquires(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+#ifdef I915
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&i915->uncore.lock, *flags);
+#else
+	*flags = 0;
+#endif
+}
+
+static void intel_vblank_section_exit_irqrestore(struct drm_i915_private *i915, unsigned long flags)
+	__releases(i915->uncore.lock)
+{
+#ifdef I915
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i915->uncore.lock, flags);
+#else
+	if (flags)
+		return;
+#endif
+}
 static void intel_vblank_section_enter(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 	__acquires(i915->uncore.lock)
 {
@@ -333,10 +353,10 @@  static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
 	 * timing critical raw register reads, potentially with
 	 * preemption disabled, so the following code must not block.
 	 */
-	local_irq_save(irqflags);
-	intel_vblank_section_enter(dev_priv);
+	intel_vblank_section_enter_irqsave(dev_priv, &irqflags);
 
-	/* preempt_disable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		preempt_disable();
 
 	/* Get optional system timestamp before query. */
 	if (stime)
@@ -400,10 +420,10 @@  static bool i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_crtc *_crtc,
 	if (etime)
 		*etime = ktime_get();
 
-	/* preempt_enable_rt() should go right here in PREEMPT_RT patchset. */
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
+		preempt_enable();
 
-	intel_vblank_section_exit(dev_priv);
-	local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+	intel_vblank_section_exit_irqrestore(dev_priv, irqflags);
 
 	/*
 	 * While in vblank, position will be negative
@@ -441,13 +461,11 @@  int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
 	unsigned long irqflags;
 	int position;
 
-	local_irq_save(irqflags);
-	intel_vblank_section_enter(dev_priv);
+	intel_vblank_section_enter_irqsave(dev_priv, &irqflags);
 
 	position = __intel_get_crtc_scanline(crtc);
 
-	intel_vblank_section_exit(dev_priv);
-	local_irq_restore(irqflags);
+	intel_vblank_section_exit_irqrestore(dev_priv, irqflags);
 
 	return position;
 }