Message ID | 20241203084706.2126189-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/6] drm/i915/wm: Initialize max_latency variable to appropriate value | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > Sent: 03 December 2024 14:17 > To: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Golani, Mitulkumar Ajitkumar <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com>; > Kandpal, Suraj <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > Subject: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/wm: Modify latency programmed into > PKG_C_LATENCY > > Increase the latency programmed into PKG_C_LATENCY latency to be a > multiple of line time which is written into WM_LINETIME. > > --v2 > -Fix commit subject line [Sai Teja] > -Use individual DISPLAY_VER checks instead of range [Sai Teja] -Initialize > max_linetime [Sai Teja] > > --v3 > -take into account the scenario when adjusted_latency is 0 [Vinod] > > --v4 > -rename adjusted_latency to latency [Mitul] -fix the condition in which dpkgc > is disabled [Vinod] > > --v5 > -Add check to see if max_linetime is 0 [Vinod] > > --v6 > -Avoid nested if statements [Mitul] > > WA: 22020299601 > Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > index 95b306c22954..4c032b1758e7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c > @@ -2861,7 +2861,8 @@ intel_program_dpkgc_latency(struct > intel_atomic_state *state) > struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm); > struct intel_crtc *crtc; > struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state; > - u32 max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > + u32 latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > + u32 max_linetime = 0; > u32 clear, val; > u32 added_wake_time = 0; > bool fixed_refresh_rate = false; > @@ -2875,18 +2876,26 @@ intel_program_dpkgc_latency(struct > intel_atomic_state *state) > (new_crtc_state->vrr.vmin == new_crtc_state->vrr.vmax > && > new_crtc_state->vrr.vmin == new_crtc_state->vrr.flipline)) > fixed_refresh_rate = true; > + > + max_linetime = max(new_crtc_state->linetime, > max_linetime); > } > > if (fixed_refresh_rate) { > - max_latency = skl_watermark_max_latency(i915, 1); > - if (max_latency == 0) > - max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > + latency = skl_watermark_max_latency(i915, 1); > + /* Wa_22020299601 */ > + if ((latency && max_linetime) && > + (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 20 || DISPLAY_VER(display) == > 30)) { > + latency = max_linetime * DIV_ROUND_UP(latency, > max_linetime); > + } else if (!latency) { > + latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > + } > + > added_wake_time = DSB_EXE_TIME + > display->sagv.block_time_us; > } > > clear = LNL_ADDED_WAKE_TIME_MASK | > LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; > - val = REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK, max_latency) | > + val = REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK, latency) | Reviewed-by: Mitul Golani <mitulkumar.ajitkumar.golani@intel.com> > REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_ADDED_WAKE_TIME_MASK, > added_wake_time); > > intel_de_rmw(display, LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY, clear, val); > -- > 2.34.1
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c index 95b306c22954..4c032b1758e7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c @@ -2861,7 +2861,8 @@ intel_program_dpkgc_latency(struct intel_atomic_state *state) struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(display->drm); struct intel_crtc *crtc; struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state; - u32 max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; + u32 latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; + u32 max_linetime = 0; u32 clear, val; u32 added_wake_time = 0; bool fixed_refresh_rate = false; @@ -2875,18 +2876,26 @@ intel_program_dpkgc_latency(struct intel_atomic_state *state) (new_crtc_state->vrr.vmin == new_crtc_state->vrr.vmax && new_crtc_state->vrr.vmin == new_crtc_state->vrr.flipline)) fixed_refresh_rate = true; + + max_linetime = max(new_crtc_state->linetime, max_linetime); } if (fixed_refresh_rate) { - max_latency = skl_watermark_max_latency(i915, 1); - if (max_latency == 0) - max_latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; + latency = skl_watermark_max_latency(i915, 1); + /* Wa_22020299601 */ + if ((latency && max_linetime) && + (DISPLAY_VER(display) == 20 || DISPLAY_VER(display) == 30)) { + latency = max_linetime * DIV_ROUND_UP(latency, max_linetime); + } else if (!latency) { + latency = LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; + } + added_wake_time = DSB_EXE_TIME + display->sagv.block_time_us; } clear = LNL_ADDED_WAKE_TIME_MASK | LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK; - val = REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK, max_latency) | + val = REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY_MASK, latency) | REG_FIELD_PREP(LNL_ADDED_WAKE_TIME_MASK, added_wake_time); intel_de_rmw(display, LNL_PKG_C_LATENCY, clear, val);
Increase the latency programmed into PKG_C_LATENCY latency to be a multiple of line time which is written into WM_LINETIME. --v2 -Fix commit subject line [Sai Teja] -Use individual DISPLAY_VER checks instead of range [Sai Teja] -Initialize max_linetime [Sai Teja] --v3 -take into account the scenario when adjusted_latency is 0 [Vinod] --v4 -rename adjusted_latency to latency [Mitul] -fix the condition in which dpkgc is disabled [Vinod] --v5 -Add check to see if max_linetime is 0 [Vinod] --v6 -Avoid nested if statements [Mitul] WA: 22020299601 Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)