diff mbox series

drm/i915/gt: Handle INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF return value in gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce

Message ID 20250116193528.2297487-1-ingyujang25@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series drm/i915/gt: Handle INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF return value in gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce | expand

Commit Message

Ingyu Jang Jan. 16, 2025, 7:35 p.m. UTC
The function 'gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce' previously did not handle the case
where 'intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake()' returns 'INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF'.
This value is returned when the 'intel_ref_tracker_alloc()' call within
'intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake()' fails to allocate due
to memory pressure or other constraints.

'intel_ref_tracker_alloc()' uses 'ref_tracker_alloc()' with the
'GFP_NOWAIT' flag, which can return 'NULL' if allocation fails.
In this case, the function explicitly returns 'INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF'.

This patch adds a check for 'INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF' in
'gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce' to ensure that such errors are properly handled.
If 'INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF' is returned, the function returns 'NULL' .

Signed-off-by: Ingyu Jang <ingyujang25@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Karas Jan. 22, 2025, 1:25 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Ingyu,

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> index d60a6ca0cae5..8d22d8f2243d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static struct intel_context *gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt, intel
>  	 * doing rpm_resume().
>  	 */
>  	*wakeref = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt);
> -	if (!*wakeref)
> +	if (!*wakeref || *wakeref == INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF)
INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is a wrapper for an error pointer - how about
IS_ERR_OR_NULL() macro? Without going a bit deeper into the code
it is not apparent that INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is indicating an error.

Nice catch nevertheless.

Krzysztof

>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	intel_engine_pm_get(ce->engine);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
Jani Nikula Jan. 22, 2025, 1:47 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, 22 Jan 2025, Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingyu,
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
>> index d60a6ca0cae5..8d22d8f2243d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
>> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static struct intel_context *gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt, intel
>>  	 * doing rpm_resume().
>>  	 */
>>  	*wakeref = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt);
>> -	if (!*wakeref)
>> +	if (!*wakeref || *wakeref == INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF)
> INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is a wrapper for an error pointer - how about
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL() macro? Without going a bit deeper into the code
> it is not apparent that INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF is indicating an error.
>
> Nice catch nevertheless.

It's not a nice catch. It's wrong [1].

BR,
Jani.


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87cyglg9w2.fsf@intel.com


>
> Krzysztof
>
>>  		return NULL;
>>  
>>  	intel_engine_pm_get(ce->engine);
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
index d60a6ca0cae5..8d22d8f2243d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt.c
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@  static struct intel_context *gen8_ggtt_bind_get_ce(struct i915_ggtt *ggtt, intel
 	 * doing rpm_resume().
 	 */
 	*wakeref = intel_gt_pm_get_if_awake(gt);
-	if (!*wakeref)
+	if (!*wakeref || *wakeref == INTEL_WAKEREF_DEF)
 		return NULL;
 
 	intel_engine_pm_get(ce->engine);