Message ID | 20250326160321.550753-2-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | VRR Register Read/Write Updates | expand |
On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 09:33:20PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote: > To avoid having VRR read/write for DSI transcoders, we currently use > !transcoder_is_dsi() in many places. > Instead introduce a new helper to check transcoder_has_vrr() and use > that to exclude transcoders which do not support VRR. > > v2: Include HAS_VRR into the helper. (Ville) > > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > index ee7812126129..0db1cd4fc963 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c > @@ -2625,6 +2625,15 @@ void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > PIPE_LINK_N2(display, transcoder)); > } > > +static bool > +transcoder_has_vrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > +{ > + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state); > + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder; > + > + return HAS_VRR(display) && !transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder); > +} > + > static void intel_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > { > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state); > @@ -2635,7 +2644,7 @@ static void intel_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta > u32 crtc_vdisplay, crtc_vtotal, crtc_vblank_start, crtc_vblank_end; > int vsyncshift = 0; > > - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)); > + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !transcoder_has_vrr(crtc_state)); Actually, this one should stay as is. We don't use this for DSI even on hardware that lacks VRR support. > > /* We need to be careful not to changed the adjusted mode, for otherwise > * the hw state checker will get angry at the mismatch. */ > @@ -2717,7 +2726,7 @@ static void intel_set_transcoder_timings_lrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc > const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode; > u32 crtc_vdisplay, crtc_vtotal, crtc_vblank_start, crtc_vblank_end; > > - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)); > + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !transcoder_has_vrr(crtc_state)); same here. > > crtc_vdisplay = adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay; > crtc_vtotal = adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal; > @@ -3908,7 +3917,7 @@ static bool hsw_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc, > DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11) > intel_get_transcoder_timings(crtc, pipe_config); > > - if (HAS_VRR(display) && !transcoder_is_dsi(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)) > + if (transcoder_has_vrr(pipe_config)) > intel_vrr_get_config(pipe_config); This one is fine. > > intel_get_pipe_src_size(crtc, pipe_config); > -- > 2.45.2
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c index ee7812126129..0db1cd4fc963 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c @@ -2625,6 +2625,15 @@ void intel_cpu_transcoder_set_m2_n2(struct intel_crtc *crtc, PIPE_LINK_N2(display, transcoder)); } +static bool +transcoder_has_vrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) +{ + struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state); + enum transcoder cpu_transcoder = crtc_state->cpu_transcoder; + + return HAS_VRR(display) && !transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder); +} + static void intel_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) { struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc_state); @@ -2635,7 +2644,7 @@ static void intel_set_transcoder_timings(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_sta u32 crtc_vdisplay, crtc_vtotal, crtc_vblank_start, crtc_vblank_end; int vsyncshift = 0; - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)); + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !transcoder_has_vrr(crtc_state)); /* We need to be careful not to changed the adjusted mode, for otherwise * the hw state checker will get angry at the mismatch. */ @@ -2717,7 +2726,7 @@ static void intel_set_transcoder_timings_lrr(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode; u32 crtc_vdisplay, crtc_vtotal, crtc_vblank_start, crtc_vblank_end; - drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder)); + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, !transcoder_has_vrr(crtc_state)); crtc_vdisplay = adjusted_mode->crtc_vdisplay; crtc_vtotal = adjusted_mode->crtc_vtotal; @@ -3908,7 +3917,7 @@ static bool hsw_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc, DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 11) intel_get_transcoder_timings(crtc, pipe_config); - if (HAS_VRR(display) && !transcoder_is_dsi(pipe_config->cpu_transcoder)) + if (transcoder_has_vrr(pipe_config)) intel_vrr_get_config(pipe_config); intel_get_pipe_src_size(crtc, pipe_config);
To avoid having VRR read/write for DSI transcoders, we currently use !transcoder_is_dsi() in many places. Instead introduce a new helper to check transcoder_has_vrr() and use that to exclude transcoders which do not support VRR. v2: Include HAS_VRR into the helper. (Ville) Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)