@@ -176,23 +176,25 @@ static unsigned long to_wait_timeout(s64 timeout_ns)
* @data: ioctl data blob
* @file: drm file pointer
*
- * Returns 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in
- * the timeout parameter.
- * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout
- * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait
- * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist
- * Also possible, but rare:
- * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall
- * -ENOMEM: damn
- * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail
- * -E?: The add request failed
- *
* The wait ioctl with a timeout of 0 reimplements the busy ioctl. With any
* non-zero timeout parameter the wait ioctl will wait for the given number of
* nanoseconds on an object becoming unbusy. Since the wait itself does so
* without holding struct_mutex the object may become re-busied before this
* function completes. A similar but shorter * race condition exists in the busy
* ioctl
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in
+ * the timeout parameter.
+ * * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout
+ * * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait
+ * * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist
+ *
+ * Also possible, but rare:
+ * * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall
+ * * -ENOMEM: damn
+ * * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail
+ * * -E?: The add request failed
*/
int
i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
The return codes for i915_gem_wait_ioctl() have identation issues, and will be displayed on a very confusing way. Use lists to improve its output. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> --- To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover. See [PATCH 00/32] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657565224.git.mchehab@kernel.org/ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)