From patchwork Mon Jul 11 20:25:02 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mauro Carvalho Chehab X-Patchwork-Id: 12914208 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B8AC43334 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C48290FD2; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0EDB8B05E; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2311BB81230; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E795C341D1; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:25:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657571125; bh=ijCPUHCQ+PvIvqv0lj0eAF28GMG83iZ88gPn2azWN00=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=LuT7CaQRkdWFb8J/EDSonrTwNrneFh4vQzZa34mfbf3abyiL9uJB0RNLTsPkHeCg9 Gvy/qehbvXma6MzykQXN6Q3bAWc9AgkVRyK737bGrBp4jccYBKwaoDhHHmVQ68qfkL QxNqwvTJi2HNVQLXX5pxdT9uId/imH0kHyPC4xg6F6hJ6PoR8puYgEKWx1mJr4pdTP xp4QpPXQmhDIu74KD0OzuNfbuv0W0qDQDEhsz7OshIbocDgDlNWJs/g9txY5KijQMz LEXa5jPSdb82yxhavdHFzgrH+8LNGXx1r4ih4RoBXA7oxqc2FReW+kwZEV2CdgUHhq 7aqWQhvXVAkKw== Received: from mchehab by mail.kernel.org with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oAzy3-004e8I-LS; Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:25:19 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 21:25:02 +0100 Message-Id: <54d781157866d7dc4f656b50500f228dca4070ed.1657565224.git.mchehab@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 17/32] drm/i915: i915_gem_wait.c: fix a kernel-doc markup X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Lucas De Marchi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, =?utf-8?q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" The return codes for i915_gem_wait_ioctl() have identation issues, and will be displayed on a very confusing way. Use lists to improve its output. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab --- To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover. See [PATCH 00/32] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657565224.git.mchehab@kernel.org/ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c index bdba05492582..7b4e216a295b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c @@ -176,23 +176,25 @@ static unsigned long to_wait_timeout(s64 timeout_ns) * @data: ioctl data blob * @file: drm file pointer * - * Returns 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in - * the timeout parameter. - * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout - * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait - * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist - * Also possible, but rare: - * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall - * -ENOMEM: damn - * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail - * -E?: The add request failed - * * The wait ioctl with a timeout of 0 reimplements the busy ioctl. With any * non-zero timeout parameter the wait ioctl will wait for the given number of * nanoseconds on an object becoming unbusy. Since the wait itself does so * without holding struct_mutex the object may become re-busied before this * function completes. A similar but shorter * race condition exists in the busy * ioctl + * + * Returns: + * 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in + * the timeout parameter. + * * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout + * * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait + * * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist + * + * Also possible, but rare: + * * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall + * * -ENOMEM: damn + * * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail + * * -E?: The add request failed */ int i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)