From patchwork Wed Jul 13 08:12:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mauro Carvalho Chehab X-Patchwork-Id: 12916201 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33E7C43334 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:14:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5762D95199; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816B095470; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934C8B81D63; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 246C1C341D6; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 08:12:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1657699952; bh=/PaxiN5HkOwyVUhkxftwWgzAT/MNna5OTFK/g/W4MZw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CDQV9r8nsXMzoxcsN2XYoy0zq28ACHNPKzcmwl5m7WDPHyiUuBguSvUgr9IdIMb2m mtfMj3DdVN2XmuU4zuT5CT5ChlyIZ6ytP3XNwPY0gp/BWHdX9yYJZ0k82oWR1pGCpy LWE2UBASspK+VXFNAw6xyG26AzySLDoR2+Ua/yMTYIEtMjOSU96RwheQR3A+DkAbWy 09iMETIr6imFYPa5ufYfZGGy/TFRZsYFQuONCR9G/jVj+Uib6sVspw2rHuIthw/+Ro piOtNteUKj+8/FZtic1AvDx1Q7kXC/12YJuThuvoFEoT8zx2InI9Us3dspUQgW80Cm IgdDyAk2QK1Yg== Received: from mchehab by mail.kernel.org with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oBXTx-004ztd-NH; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:12:29 +0100 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:12:08 +0100 Message-Id: <7506a4fc57d2bf064f6a35d70c8cd7885082863e.1657699522.git.mchehab@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 20/39] drm/i915: i915_gem_wait.c: fix a kernel-doc markup X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Hellstr=C3=B6m?= , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Wilson , Matthew Auld , Rodrigo Vivi , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, =?utf-8?q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" The return codes for i915_gem_wait_ioctl() have identation issues, and will be displayed on a very confusing way. Use lists to improve its output. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- To avoid mailbombing on a large number of people, only mailing lists were C/C on the cover. See [PATCH v2 00/39] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1657699522.git.mchehab@kernel.org/ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c | 24 +++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c index 4a33ad2d122b..1fd5cff552ed 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_wait.c @@ -210,23 +210,25 @@ static unsigned long to_wait_timeout(s64 timeout_ns) * @data: ioctl data blob * @file: drm file pointer * - * Returns 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in - * the timeout parameter. - * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout - * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait - * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist - * Also possible, but rare: - * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall - * -ENOMEM: damn - * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail - * -E?: The add request failed - * * The wait ioctl with a timeout of 0 reimplements the busy ioctl. With any * non-zero timeout parameter the wait ioctl will wait for the given number of * nanoseconds on an object becoming unbusy. Since the wait itself does so * without holding struct_mutex the object may become re-busied before this * function completes. A similar but shorter * race condition exists in the busy * ioctl + * + * Returns: + * 0 if successful, else an error is returned with the remaining time in + * the timeout parameter. + * * -ETIME: object is still busy after timeout + * * -ERESTARTSYS: signal interrupted the wait + * * -ENONENT: object doesn't exist + * + * Also possible, but rare: + * * -EAGAIN: incomplete, restart syscall + * * -ENOMEM: damn + * * -ENODEV: Internal IRQ fail + * * -E?: The add request failed */ int i915_gem_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)