diff mbox series

[1/2] io_uring: don't use TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL to test for availability of task_work

Message ID 20221217204840.45213-2-axboe@kernel.dk (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series tw/wakeup tweaks | expand

Commit Message

Jens Axboe Dec. 17, 2022, 8:48 p.m. UTC
Use task_work_pending() as a better test for whether we have task_work
or not, TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL is only valid if the any of the task_work
items had been queued with TWA_SIGNAL as the notification mechanism.
Hence task_work_pending() is a more reliable check.

Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.h | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.h b/io_uring/io_uring.h
index c117e029c8dc..e9f0d41ebb99 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.h
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.h
@@ -266,8 +266,7 @@  static inline int io_run_task_work(void)
 
 static inline bool io_task_work_pending(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	return test_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL) ||
-		!wq_list_empty(&ctx->work_llist);
+	return task_work_pending(current) || !wq_list_empty(&ctx->work_llist);
 }
 
 static inline int io_run_task_work_ctx(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)