@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ __cold bool __io_alloc_req_refill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;
void *reqs[IO_REQ_ALLOC_BATCH];
- int ret, i;
+ int ret;
/*
* If we have more than a batch's worth of requests in our IRQ side
@@ -1066,8 +1066,8 @@ __cold bool __io_alloc_req_refill(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
}
percpu_ref_get_many(&ctx->refs, ret);
- for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
- struct io_kiocb *req = reqs[i];
+ while (ret--) {
+ struct io_kiocb *req = reqs[ret];
io_preinit_req(req, ctx);
io_req_add_to_cache(req, ctx);
The allocator will generally return memory in order, but __io_alloc_req_refill() then adds them to a stack and we'll extract them in the opposite order. This obviously isn't a huge deal, but: 1) it makes debugging easier when they are in order 2) keeping them in-order is the right thing to do 3) reduces the code for adding them to the stack Just add them in reverse to the stack. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> ---