mbox series

[0/5] KVM: x86: Handle reserved CR4 bit interception in VMX

Message ID 20200930041659.28181-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series KVM: x86: Handle reserved CR4 bit interception in VMX | expand

Message

Sean Christopherson Sept. 30, 2020, 4:16 a.m. UTC
This series stems from Lai's RFC patches to intercept LA57 and let the
guest own FSGSBASE[*].  Discussion and inspection revealed that KVM does
not handle the case where LA57 is supported in hardware but not exposed to
the guest.  This is actually true for all CR4 bits, but LA57 is currently
the only bit that can be reserved and also owned by the guest.  I have
a unit test for this that I'll post separately.

Intercepting LA57 was by far the easiest fix for the immedidate bug, and
is likely the right change in the long term as there's no justification
for letting the guest own LA57.

The middle three patches adjust VMX's CR4 guest/host mask to intercept
reserved bits.  This required reworking CPUID updates to also refresh said
mask at the correct time.

The last past is Lai's, which let's the guest own FSGSBASE.  This depends
on the reserved bit handling being in place.

Ran everything through unit tests, and ran the kernel's FSGSBASE selftests
in a VM.

[*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200928083047.3349-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com

Lai Jiangshan (2):
  KVM: x86: Intercept LA57 to inject #GP fault when it's reserved
  KVM: x86: Let the guest own CR4.FSGSBASE

Sean Christopherson (3):
  KVM: x86: Invoke vendor's vcpu_after_set_cpuid() after all common
    updates
  KVM: x86: Move call to update_exception_bitmap() into VMX code
  KVM: VMX: Intercept guest reserved CR4 bits to inject #GP fault

 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c          |  6 +++---
 arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c        | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Paolo Bonzini Oct. 19, 2020, 3:59 p.m. UTC | #1
On 30/09/20 06:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This series stems from Lai's RFC patches to intercept LA57 and let the
> guest own FSGSBASE[*].  Discussion and inspection revealed that KVM does
> not handle the case where LA57 is supported in hardware but not exposed to
> the guest.  This is actually true for all CR4 bits, but LA57 is currently
> the only bit that can be reserved and also owned by the guest.  I have
> a unit test for this that I'll post separately.
> 
> Intercepting LA57 was by far the easiest fix for the immedidate bug, and
> is likely the right change in the long term as there's no justification
> for letting the guest own LA57.
> 
> The middle three patches adjust VMX's CR4 guest/host mask to intercept
> reserved bits.  This required reworking CPUID updates to also refresh said
> mask at the correct time.
> 
> The last past is Lai's, which let's the guest own FSGSBASE.  This depends
> on the reserved bit handling being in place.
> 
> Ran everything through unit tests, and ran the kernel's FSGSBASE selftests
> in a VM.
> 
> [*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200928083047.3349-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (2):
>   KVM: x86: Intercept LA57 to inject #GP fault when it's reserved
>   KVM: x86: Let the guest own CR4.FSGSBASE
> 
> Sean Christopherson (3):
>   KVM: x86: Invoke vendor's vcpu_after_set_cpuid() after all common
>     updates
>   KVM: x86: Move call to update_exception_bitmap() into VMX code
>   KVM: VMX: Intercept guest reserved CR4 bits to inject #GP fault
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c          |  6 +++---
>  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c        | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo
Paolo Bonzini Oct. 20, 2020, 9:13 a.m. UTC | #2
On 30/09/20 06:16, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This series stems from Lai's RFC patches to intercept LA57 and let the
> guest own FSGSBASE[*].  Discussion and inspection revealed that KVM does
> not handle the case where LA57 is supported in hardware but not exposed to
> the guest.  This is actually true for all CR4 bits, but LA57 is currently
> the only bit that can be reserved and also owned by the guest.  I have
> a unit test for this that I'll post separately.
> 
> Intercepting LA57 was by far the easiest fix for the immedidate bug, and
> is likely the right change in the long term as there's no justification
> for letting the guest own LA57.
> 
> The middle three patches adjust VMX's CR4 guest/host mask to intercept
> reserved bits.  This required reworking CPUID updates to also refresh said
> mask at the correct time.
> 
> The last past is Lai's, which let's the guest own FSGSBASE.  This depends
> on the reserved bit handling being in place.
> 
> Ran everything through unit tests, and ran the kernel's FSGSBASE selftests
> in a VM.
> 
> [*] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200928083047.3349-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (2):
>   KVM: x86: Intercept LA57 to inject #GP fault when it's reserved
>   KVM: x86: Let the guest own CR4.FSGSBASE
> 
> Sean Christopherson (3):
>   KVM: x86: Invoke vendor's vcpu_after_set_cpuid() after all common
>     updates
>   KVM: x86: Move call to update_exception_bitmap() into VMX code
>   KVM: VMX: Intercept guest reserved CR4 bits to inject #GP fault
> 
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c          |  6 +++---
>  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h |  2 +-
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c        | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo