| Message ID | 20210907180957.609966-1-ricarkol@google.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | KVM: selftests: enable the memslot tests in ARM64 | expand |
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64 > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits > regarding ucalls (first patch). > > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please? > > Changes: > v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew). Hi Ricardo, You could have collected all the r-b's too. Thanks, drew > > Ricardo Koller (2): > KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent > KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++-------- > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog >
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64 > > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in > > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits > > regarding ucalls (first patch). > > > > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please? > > > > Changes: > > v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew). > > Hi Ricardo, > > You could have collected all the r-b's too. Thanks Andrew. Will try to do it next time (if changes are small like in this patch set. Thanks, Ricardo > > Thanks, > drew > > > > > Ricardo Koller (2): > > KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent > > KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 > > > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + > > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++-------- > > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog > > >
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 08:17:37PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:09:55AM -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64 > > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in > > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits > > regarding ucalls (first patch). > > > > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please? > > > > Changes: > > v2: Makefile tests in the right order (from Andrew). > > Hi Ricardo, > > You could have collected all the r-b's too. > > Thanks, > drew > Friendly ping on this one, please. > > > > Ricardo Koller (2): > > KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent > > KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 > > > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + > > .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 56 +++++++++++-------- > > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > 2.33.0.153.gba50c8fa24-goog > > >
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:09:55 -0700, Ricardo Koller wrote: > Enable memslot_modification_stress_test and memslot_perf_test in ARM64 > (second patch). memslot_modification_stress_test builds and runs in > aarch64 without any modification. memslot_perf_test needs some nits > regarding ucalls (first patch). > > Can anybody try these two tests in s390, please? > > [...] Applied to next, thanks! [1/2] KVM: selftests: make memslot_perf_test arch independent commit: ffb4ce3c49366f02f1c064fbe2e66a96ab5f98b8 [2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 commit: 358928fd5264f069b9758f8b29297c7bff2a06de Cheers, M.