Message ID | 20220720142526.29634-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <kvm-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B885CCA483 for <kvm@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233385AbiGTOZt (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@archiver.kernel.org>); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:25:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40066 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231649AbiGTOZn (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:25:43 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32CD3BEE; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 07:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 26KEGjDe003553; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:34 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=8lSB9mafGrjcKZov6yb9ftoj03r2mOT0OLi8qPwQRFg=; b=bg4rxpVcn2kykTzqOW4WyOCkUshY8u7lXJNecHRkahisEKa9hpQQtNqpxswlJnOk/LeP lc6qPlM1QgebyXgbAvNbOay3tTlJVb1mTJRYLaUuMnwGkCxqtnvRv8rEGpjsXJi8qONa 41UMBafY09VcyGA+rfOKtyauDYHuHsAdL9LBgABrN9/yGqVuTPt3hDghgYRfxzT1mv8t FR09SF//va2DpQAGWGdQMljwakOXgA6s8+1dH2tAyTy0O7aivtyrOJDo38gU0VOBI79X uCajphcfCqDAmWO8LPo0BRLJ+L5a1DuEGsO5f4wPegrVph37xuXaqZrLzwrVkioVzpwC +Q== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hekat89dd-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:34 +0000 Received: from m0098419.ppops.net (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 26KEIjrU013767; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:33 GMT Received: from ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (46.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.70]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3hekat89cm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:33 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma01fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 26KEKmDt004755; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:31 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma01fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3hbmy8wtd3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:31 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 26KEPSiO18874746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:28 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B35611C052; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF37211C04C; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:25:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 0/2] Add specification exception tests Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 16:25:24 +0200 Message-Id: <20220720142526.29634-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Rai7SP80XDD8cFTTqcsD4jmDEFTMlpRl X-Proofpoint-GUID: En4q4iHDiXdhKTEbA5SaKt1LEI65tuD8 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-07-20_08,2022-07-20_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2206140000 definitions=main-2207200056 Precedence: bulk List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
Add specification exception tests
|
expand
|
Test that specification exceptions cause the correct interruption code during both normal and transactional execution. TCG fails the tests setting an invalid PSW bit. I had a look at how best to fix it, but where best to check for early PSW exceptions was not immediately clear to me. Ideas welcome. v4 -> v5 add lpsw with invalid bit 12 test TCG fails as with lpswe but must also invert bit 12 update copyright statement add comments cleanups and style fixes v3 -> v4 remove iterations argument in order to simplify the code for manual performance testing adding a for loop is easy move report out of fixup_invalid_psw simplify/improve readability of triggers use positive error values v2 -> v3 remove non-ascii symbol clean up load_psw fix nits v1 -> v2 Add license and test description Split test patch into normal test and transactional execution test Add comments to invalid PSW fixup function with_transaction Rename some variables/functions Pass mask as single parameter to asm Get rid of report_info_if macro Introduce report_pass/fail and use them Janis Schoetterl-Glausch (2): s390x: Add specification exception test s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction s390x/Makefile | 1 + lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 6 + s390x/spec_ex.c | 369 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 + 4 files changed, 379 insertions(+) create mode 100644 s390x/spec_ex.c Range-diff against v4: 1: a242e84b ! 1: fd9780d8 s390x: Add specification exception test @@ s390x/Makefile: tests += $(TEST_DIR)/uv-host.elf tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex-sie.elf +tests += $(TEST_DIR)/spec_ex.elf tests += $(TEST_DIR)/firq.elf + tests += $(TEST_DIR)/epsw.elf + tests += $(TEST_DIR)/adtl-status.elf + + ## lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h ## +@@ lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h: struct psw { + uint64_t addr; + }; - tests_binary = $(patsubst %.elf,%.bin,$(tests)) ++struct short_psw { ++ uint32_t mask; ++ uint32_t addr; ++}; ++ + #define AS_PRIM 0 + #define AS_ACCR 1 + #define AS_SECN 2 ## s390x/spec_ex.c (new) ## @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* -+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2021 ++ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2021, 2022 + * + * Specification exception test. + * Tests that specification exceptions occur when expected. @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) +#include <libcflat.h> +#include <asm/interrupt.h> + -+static struct lowcore *lc = (struct lowcore *) 0; -+ +static bool invalid_psw_expected; +static struct psw expected_psw; +static struct psw invalid_psw; +static struct psw fixup_psw; + -+/* The standard program exception handler cannot deal with invalid old PSWs, ++/* ++ * The standard program exception handler cannot deal with invalid old PSWs, + * especially not invalid instruction addresses, as in that case one cannot + * find the instruction following the faulting one from the old PSW. + * The PSW to return to is set by load_psw. + */ +static void fixup_invalid_psw(void) +{ -+ // signal occurrence of invalid psw fixup ++ /* signal occurrence of invalid psw fixup */ + invalid_psw_expected = false; -+ invalid_psw = lc->pgm_old_psw; -+ lc->pgm_old_psw = fixup_psw; ++ invalid_psw = lowcore.pgm_old_psw; ++ lowcore.pgm_old_psw = fixup_psw; +} + -+/* Load possibly invalid psw, but setup fixup_psw before, -+ * so that *fixup_invalid_psw() can bring us back onto the right track. ++/* ++ * Load possibly invalid psw, but setup fixup_psw before, ++ * so that fixup_invalid_psw() can bring us back onto the right track. + * Also acts as compiler barrier, -> none required in expect/check_invalid_psw + */ +static void load_psw(struct psw psw) @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) + uint64_t scratch; + + fixup_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask(); -+ asm volatile ( "larl %[scratch],nop%=\n" ++ asm volatile ( "larl %[scratch],0f\n" + " stg %[scratch],%[addr]\n" + " lpswe %[psw]\n" -+ "nop%=: nop\n" -+ : [scratch] "=&r"(scratch), ++ "0: nop\n" ++ : [scratch] "=&d"(scratch), ++ [addr] "=&T"(fixup_psw.addr) ++ : [psw] "Q"(psw) ++ : "cc", "memory" ++ ); ++} ++ ++static void load_short_psw(struct short_psw psw) ++{ ++ uint64_t scratch; ++ ++ fixup_psw.mask = extract_psw_mask(); ++ asm volatile ( "larl %[scratch],0f\n" ++ " stg %[scratch],%[addr]\n" ++ " lpsw %[psw]\n" ++ "0: nop\n" ++ : [scratch] "=&d"(scratch), + [addr] "=&T"(fixup_psw.addr) + : [psw] "Q"(psw) + : "cc", "memory" @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) + +static int check_invalid_psw(void) +{ -+ // toggled to signal occurrence of invalid psw fixup ++ /* toggled to signal occurrence of invalid psw fixup */ + if (!invalid_psw_expected) { + if (expected_psw.mask == invalid_psw.mask && + expected_psw.addr == invalid_psw.addr) @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) + struct psw invalid = { .mask = 0x0008000000000000, .addr = 0x00000000deadbeee}; + + expect_invalid_psw(invalid); -+ load_psw(expected_psw); ++ load_psw(invalid); + return check_invalid_psw(); +} + ++static int short_psw_bit_12_is_0(void) ++{ ++ struct short_psw short_invalid = { .mask = 0x00000000, .addr = 0xdeadbeee}; ++ ++ /* ++ * lpsw may optionally check bit 12 before loading the new psw ++ * -> cannot check the expected invalid psw like with lpswe ++ */ ++ load_short_psw(short_invalid); ++ return 0; ++} ++ +static int bad_alignment(void) +{ + uint32_t words[5] __attribute__((aligned(16))); @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) +{ + uint64_t quad[2] __attribute__((aligned(16))) = {0}; + -+ asm volatile (".insn rxy,0xe3000000008f,%%r7,%[quad]" //lpq %%r7,%[quad] ++ asm volatile (".insn rxy,0xe3000000008f,%%r7,%[quad]" /* lpq %%r7,%[quad] */ + : : [quad] "T"(quad) + : "%r7", "%r8" + ); @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) +/* List of all tests to execute */ +static const struct spec_ex_trigger spec_ex_triggers[] = { + { "psw_bit_12_is_1", &psw_bit_12_is_1, &fixup_invalid_psw }, ++ { "short_psw_bit_12_is_0", &short_psw_bit_12_is_0, &fixup_invalid_psw }, + { "bad_alignment", &bad_alignment, NULL }, + { "not_even", ¬_even, NULL }, + { NULL, NULL, NULL }, @@ s390x/spec_ex.c (new) + +static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) +{ -+ uint16_t expected_pgm = PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION; -+ uint16_t pgm; + int rc; + + expect_pgm_int(); + register_pgm_cleanup_func(trigger->fixup); + rc = trigger->func(); + register_pgm_cleanup_func(NULL); ++ /* test failed, nothing to be done, reporting responsibility of trigger */ + if (rc) + return; -+ pgm = clear_pgm_int(); -+ report(pgm == expected_pgm, "Program interrupt: expected(%d) == received(%d)", -+ expected_pgm, pgm); ++ check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION); +} + +int main(int argc, char **argv) @@ s390x/unittests.cfg: file = mvpg-sie.elf +[spec_ex] +file = spec_ex.elf + - [firq-linear-cpu-ids] + [firq-linear-cpu-ids-kvm] file = firq.elf timeout = 20 2: 16ce8bb0 ! 2: c14092a3 s390x: Test specification exceptions during transaction @@ Commit message Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com> ## lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h ## -@@ lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h: struct psw { +@@ lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h: struct short_psw { #define PSW_MASK_BA 0x0000000080000000UL #define PSW_MASK_64 (PSW_MASK_BA | PSW_MASK_EA) -+#define CTL0_TRANSACT_EX_CTL (63 - 8) - #define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35) - #define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40) - #define CTL0_IEP (63 - 43) ++#define CTL0_TRANSACT_EX_CTL (63 - 8) + #define CTL0_LOW_ADDR_PROT (63 - 35) + #define CTL0_EDAT (63 - 40) + #define CTL0_FETCH_PROTECTION_OVERRIDE (63 - 38) ## s390x/spec_ex.c ## @@ @@ s390x/spec_ex.c #include <asm/interrupt.h> +#include <asm/facility.h> - static struct lowcore *lc = (struct lowcore *) 0; - + static bool invalid_psw_expected; + static struct psw expected_psw; @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int not_even(void) /* * Harness for specification exception testing. @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int not_even(void) /* List of all tests to execute */ static const struct spec_ex_trigger spec_ex_triggers[] = { - { "psw_bit_12_is_1", &psw_bit_12_is_1, &fixup_invalid_psw }, +- { "short_psw_bit_12_is_0", &short_psw_bit_12_is_0, &fixup_invalid_psw }, - { "bad_alignment", &bad_alignment, NULL }, - { "not_even", ¬_even, NULL }, - { NULL, NULL, NULL }, + { "psw_bit_12_is_1", &psw_bit_12_is_1, false, &fixup_invalid_psw }, ++ { "short_psw_bit_12_is_0", &short_psw_bit_12_is_0, false, &fixup_invalid_psw }, + { "bad_alignment", &bad_alignment, true, NULL }, + { "not_even", ¬_even, true, NULL }, + { NULL, NULL, false, NULL }, @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static int not_even(void) static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) - expected_pgm, pgm); + check_pgm_int_code(PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION); } +#define TRANSACTION_COMPLETED 4 +#define TRANSACTION_MAX_RETRIES 5 + -+/* NULL must be passed to __builtin_tbegin via constant, forbid diagnose from ++/* ++ * NULL must be passed to __builtin_tbegin via constant, forbid diagnose from + * being NULL to keep things simple + */ +static int __attribute__((nonnull)) @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) + int cc; + + cc = __builtin_tbegin(diagnose); ++ /* ++ * Everything between tbegin and tend is part of the transaction, ++ * which either completes in its entirety or does not have any effect. ++ * If the transaction fails, execution is reset to this point with another ++ * condition code indicating why the transaction failed. ++ */ + if (cc == _HTM_TBEGIN_STARTED) { -+ /* return code is meaningless: transaction needs to complete ++ /* ++ * return code is meaningless: transaction needs to complete + * in order to return and completion indicates a test failure + */ + trigger(); @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) + trans_result = with_transaction(trigger->func, tdb); + if (trans_result == _HTM_TBEGIN_TRANSIENT) { + mb(); -+ pgm = lc->pgm_int_code; -+ if (pgm == 0) -+ continue; -+ else if (pgm == expected_pgm) ++ pgm = lowcore.pgm_int_code; ++ if (pgm == expected_pgm) + return 0; ++ else if (pgm == 0) ++ /* ++ * Transaction failed for unknown reason but not because ++ * of an unexpected program exception. Give it another ++ * go so that hopefully it reaches the triggering instruction. ++ */ ++ continue; + } + return trans_result; + } @@ s390x/spec_ex.c: static void test_spec_ex(const struct spec_ex_trigger *trigger) + report_fail("Transaction completed without exception"); + break; + case TRANSACTION_MAX_RETRIES: -+ report_info("Retried transaction %lu times without exception", ++ report_skip("Transaction retried %lu times with transient failures, giving up", + args->max_retries); + break; + default: -+ report_fail("Invalid return transaction result"); ++ report_fail("Invalid transaction result"); + break; + } + + ctl_clear_bit(0, CTL0_TRANSACT_EX_CTL); +} + ++static bool parse_unsigned(const char *arg, unsigned int *out) ++{ ++ char *end; ++ long num; ++ ++ if (arg[0] == '\0') ++ return false; ++ num = strtol(arg, &end, 10); ++ if (end[0] != '\0' || num < 0) ++ return false; ++ *out = num; ++ return true; ++} ++ +static struct args parse_args(int argc, char **argv) +{ + struct args args = { + .max_retries = 20, + .diagnose = false + }; -+ unsigned int i; -+ long arg; -+ bool no_arg; -+ char *end; ++ unsigned int i, arg; ++ bool has_arg; + const char *flag; -+ uint64_t *argp; + + for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) { -+ no_arg = true; -+ if (i < argc - 1) { -+ no_arg = *argv[i + 1] == '\0'; -+ arg = strtol(argv[i + 1], &end, 10); -+ no_arg |= *end != '\0'; -+ no_arg |= arg < 0; -+ } ++ if (i + 1 < argc) ++ has_arg = parse_unsigned(argv[i + 1], &arg); ++ else ++ has_arg = false; + + flag = "--max-retries"; -+ argp = &args.max_retries; + if (!strcmp(flag, argv[i])) { -+ if (no_arg) ++ if (!has_arg) + report_abort("%s needs a positive parameter", flag); -+ *argp = arg; ++ args.max_retries = arg; + ++i; + continue; + } base-commit: ca85dda2671e88d34acfbca6de48a9ab32b1810d