Message ID | 20231011230115.35719-1-brett.creeley@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | pds/vfio: Fixes for locking bugs | expand |
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:01:12 -0700 Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com> wrote: > This series contains fixes for locking bugs in the recently introduced > pds-vfio-pci driver. There was an initial bug reported by Dan Carpenter > at: > > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1f9bc27b-3de9-4891-9687-ba2820c1b390@moroto.mountain/ > > However, more locking bugs were found when looking into the previously > mentioned issue. So, all fixes are included in this series. > > v2: > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230914191540.54946-1-brett.creeley@amd.com/ > - Trim the OOPs in the patch commit messages > - Rework patch 3/3 to only unlock the spinlock once I thought we determined the spinlock, and thus the atomic context, was an arbitrary choice. I would have figured we simply convert it to a mutex. Why didn't we take that route? Thanks, Alex > - Destroy the state_mutex in the driver specific vfio_device_ops.release > callback > > Brett Creeley (3): > pds/vfio: Fix spinlock bad magic BUG > pds/vfio: Fix mutex lock->magic != lock warning > pds/vfio: Fix possible sleep while in atomic context > > drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >
On 10/13/2023 2:09 PM, Alex Williamson wrote: > Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding. > > > On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 16:01:12 -0700 > Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@amd.com> wrote: > >> This series contains fixes for locking bugs in the recently introduced >> pds-vfio-pci driver. There was an initial bug reported by Dan Carpenter >> at: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1f9bc27b-3de9-4891-9687-ba2820c1b390@moroto.mountain/ >> >> However, more locking bugs were found when looking into the previously >> mentioned issue. So, all fixes are included in this series. >> >> v2: >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20230914191540.54946-1-brett.creeley@amd.com/ >> - Trim the OOPs in the patch commit messages >> - Rework patch 3/3 to only unlock the spinlock once > > I thought we determined the spinlock, and thus the atomic context, was > an arbitrary choice. I would have figured we simply convert it to a > mutex. Why didn't we take that route? Thanks, > > Alex Hmm. I guess it wasn't completely clear that was the expected solution even after Jason's response. However, I can resubmit a v3 with that change. Thanks, Brett > >> - Destroy the state_mutex in the driver specific vfio_device_ops.release >> callback >> >> Brett Creeley (3): >> pds/vfio: Fix spinlock bad magic BUG >> pds/vfio: Fix mutex lock->magic != lock warning >> pds/vfio: Fix possible sleep while in atomic context >> >> drivers/vfio/pci/pds/vfio_dev.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >