Message ID | 20240125015420.1960090-1-maobibo@loongson.cn (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | VM: selftests: Add LoongArch support | expand |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, Bibo Mao wrote: > --- > Tianrui Zhao (4): > KVM: selftests: Add KVM selftests header files for LoongArch > KVM: selftests: Add core KVM selftests support for LoongArch > KVM: selftests: Add ucall test support for LoongArch > KVM: selftests: Add test cases for LoongArch > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 16 + > .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 5 + > .../kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h | 133 +++++++ > .../selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/ucall.h | 20 ++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S | 59 ++++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c | 332 ++++++++++++++++++ > .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c | 38 ++ > .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/ucall.h > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c I did a *very* quick read through and didn't see anything egregious. I really hope that someday we can deduplicate much of the ARM/RISC-V/LoongArch code, but that's no reason to hold up getting selftests support merged.
On 2024/1/27 上午4:32, Sean Christopherson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, Bibo Mao wrote: >> --- >> Tianrui Zhao (4): >> KVM: selftests: Add KVM selftests header files for LoongArch >> KVM: selftests: Add core KVM selftests support for LoongArch >> KVM: selftests: Add ucall test support for LoongArch >> KVM: selftests: Add test cases for LoongArch >> >> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 16 + >> .../selftests/kvm/include/kvm_util_base.h | 5 + >> .../kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h | 133 +++++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/ucall.h | 20 ++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S | 59 ++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c | 332 ++++++++++++++++++ >> .../selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c | 38 ++ >> .../selftests/kvm/set_memory_region_test.c | 2 +- >> 8 files changed, 604 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/processor.h >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/loongarch/ucall.h >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/exception.S >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/processor.c >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/loongarch/ucall.c > > I did a *very* quick read through and didn't see anything egregious. I really > hope that someday we can deduplicate much of the ARM/RISC-V/LoongArch code, but > that's no reason to hold up getting selftests support merged. > kvm seltests for LoongArch originally comes from ARM64, especially ucall and page table walk code. And LoongArch kvm actually benefits much from open source code, we will deduplicate some ARM/RISC-V/LoongArch kvm selftests code when LoongArch KVM is basically supported. Regards Bibo Mao