Message ID | 1242730443-15656-5-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > While trying to get Hyper-V running, I realized that the interrupt injection > mechanisms that are in place right now are not 100% correct. > > This patch makes nested SVM's interrupt injection behave more like on a > real machine. > > v2 calls BUG_ON when svm_set_irq is called with GIF=0 > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > index fa2a710..5b14c9d 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c > @@ -1517,7 +1517,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, > /* Kill any pending exceptions */ > if (svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending == true) > nsvm_printk("WARNING: Pending Exception\n"); > - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; > + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); > + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); > What about pending NMI here? > /* Restore selected save entries */ > svm->vmcb->save.es = hsave->save.es; > @@ -1585,7 +1586,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, > svm->nested_vmcb = svm->vmcb->save.rax; > > /* Clear internal status */ > - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; > + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); > + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); > And here. > /* Save the old vmcb, so we don't need to pick what we save, but > can restore everything when a VMEXIT occurs */ > @@ -2277,21 +2279,14 @@ static inline void svm_inject_irq(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int irq) > ((/*control->int_vector >> 4*/ 0xf) << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT); > } > > -static void svm_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr) > -{ > - struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); > - > - svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr | > - SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR; > -} > - > static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq) > { > struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); > > - nested_svm_intr(svm); > + BUG_ON(!(svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK)); > > - svm_queue_irq(vcpu, irq); > + svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = irq | > + SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR; > } > > static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr) > @@ -2319,13 +2314,25 @@ static int svm_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb; > return (vmcb->save.rflags & X86_EFLAGS_IF) && > !(vmcb->control.int_state & SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK) && > - (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK); > + (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK) && > + !is_nested(svm); > } > > static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - svm_set_vintr(to_svm(vcpu)); > - svm_inject_irq(to_svm(vcpu), 0x0); > + struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); > + nsvm_printk("Trying to open IRQ window\n"); > + > + nested_svm_intr(svm); > + > + /* In case GIF=0 we can't rely on the CPU to tell us when > + * GIF becomes 1, because that's a separate STGI/VMRUN intercept. > + * The next time we get that intercept, this function will be > + * called again though and we'll get the vintr intercept. */ > + if (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK) { > + svm_set_vintr(svm); > + svm_inject_irq(svm, 0x0); > + } > } > > static void enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -2393,6 +2400,8 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm) > case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_EXEPT: > /* In case of software exception do not reinject an exception > vector, but re-execute and instruction instead */ > + if (is_nested(svm)) > + break; > if (vector == BP_VECTOR || vector == OF_VECTOR) > break; > if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) { > -- > 1.6.0.2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 19.05.2009, at 15:22, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >> While trying to get Hyper-V running, I realized that the interrupt >> injection >> mechanisms that are in place right now are not 100% correct. >> >> This patch makes nested SVM's interrupt injection behave more like >> on a >> real machine. >> >> v2 calls BUG_ON when svm_set_irq is called with GIF=0 >> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> index fa2a710..5b14c9d 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >> @@ -1517,7 +1517,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct >> vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, >> /* Kill any pending exceptions */ >> if (svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending == true) >> nsvm_printk("WARNING: Pending Exception\n"); >> - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; >> + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); >> + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); >> > What about pending NMI here? NMI injected to the guest? That should have triggered by now and caused an #NMI exit, no? Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 01:47:08PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 19.05.2009, at 15:22, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:54:03PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> While trying to get Hyper-V running, I realized that the interrupt >>> injection >>> mechanisms that are in place right now are not 100% correct. >>> >>> This patch makes nested SVM's interrupt injection behave more like >>> on a >>> real machine. >>> >>> v2 calls BUG_ON when svm_set_irq is called with GIF=0 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >>> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> index fa2a710..5b14c9d 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c >>> @@ -1517,7 +1517,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct >>> vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, >>> /* Kill any pending exceptions */ >>> if (svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending == true) >>> nsvm_printk("WARNING: Pending Exception\n"); >>> - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; >>> + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); >>> + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); >>> >> What about pending NMI here? > > NMI injected to the guest? That should have triggered by now and caused > an #NMI exit, no? > I don't really understand what this code is doing, but there are three types of events exception/interrupt/nmi you clear only two of them. If you are sure this is correct then OK. -- Gleb. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c index fa2a710..5b14c9d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c @@ -1517,7 +1517,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmexit_real(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, /* Kill any pending exceptions */ if (svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending == true) nsvm_printk("WARNING: Pending Exception\n"); - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); /* Restore selected save entries */ svm->vmcb->save.es = hsave->save.es; @@ -1585,7 +1586,8 @@ static int nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm, void *arg1, svm->nested_vmcb = svm->vmcb->save.rax; /* Clear internal status */ - svm->vcpu.arch.exception.pending = false; + kvm_clear_exception_queue(&svm->vcpu); + kvm_clear_interrupt_queue(&svm->vcpu); /* Save the old vmcb, so we don't need to pick what we save, but can restore everything when a VMEXIT occurs */ @@ -2277,21 +2279,14 @@ static inline void svm_inject_irq(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int irq) ((/*control->int_vector >> 4*/ 0xf) << V_INTR_PRIO_SHIFT); } -static void svm_queue_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr) -{ - struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); - - svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = nr | - SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR; -} - static void svm_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq) { struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); - nested_svm_intr(svm); + BUG_ON(!(svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK)); - svm_queue_irq(vcpu, irq); + svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = irq | + SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_INTR; } static void update_cr8_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int tpr, int irr) @@ -2319,13 +2314,25 @@ static int svm_interrupt_allowed(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct vmcb *vmcb = svm->vmcb; return (vmcb->save.rflags & X86_EFLAGS_IF) && !(vmcb->control.int_state & SVM_INTERRUPT_SHADOW_MASK) && - (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK); + (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK) && + !is_nested(svm); } static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - svm_set_vintr(to_svm(vcpu)); - svm_inject_irq(to_svm(vcpu), 0x0); + struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu); + nsvm_printk("Trying to open IRQ window\n"); + + nested_svm_intr(svm); + + /* In case GIF=0 we can't rely on the CPU to tell us when + * GIF becomes 1, because that's a separate STGI/VMRUN intercept. + * The next time we get that intercept, this function will be + * called again though and we'll get the vintr intercept. */ + if (svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_GIF_MASK) { + svm_set_vintr(svm); + svm_inject_irq(svm, 0x0); + } } static void enable_nmi_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -2393,6 +2400,8 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm) case SVM_EXITINTINFO_TYPE_EXEPT: /* In case of software exception do not reinject an exception vector, but re-execute and instruction instead */ + if (is_nested(svm)) + break; if (vector == BP_VECTOR || vector == OF_VECTOR) break; if (exitintinfo & SVM_EXITINTINFO_VALID_ERR) {
While trying to get Hyper-V running, I realized that the interrupt injection mechanisms that are in place right now are not 100% correct. This patch makes nested SVM's interrupt injection behave more like on a real machine. v2 calls BUG_ON when svm_set_irq is called with GIF=0 Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> --- arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)