[6/6] Revert "KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_free_page"

Commit Message

[e-mail] Jan. 30, 2013, 2:42 p.m. UTC

From: Gleb Natapov <[e-mail]>

This reverts commit bd4c86eaa6ff10abc4e00d0f45d2a28b10b09df4.

There is not user for kvm_mmu_isolate_page() any more.

Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <[e-mail]>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |   21 +++------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 42ba85c..0242a8a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1461,28 +1461,14 @@  static inline void kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, int nr)
 	percpu_counter_add(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages, nr);
 }
 
-/*
- * Remove the sp from shadow page cache, after call it,
- * we can not find this sp from the cache, and the shadow
- * page table is still valid.
- * It should be under the protection of mmu lock.
- */
-static void kvm_mmu_isolate_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	ASSERT(is_empty_shadow_page(sp->spt));
 	hlist_del(&sp->hash_link);
-	if (!sp->role.direct)
-		free_page((unsigned long)sp->gfns);
-}
-
-/*
- * Free the shadow page table and the sp, we can do it
- * out of the protection of mmu lock.
- */
-static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
-{
 	list_del(&sp->link);
 	free_page((unsigned long)sp->spt);
+	if (!sp->role.direct)
+		free_page((unsigned long)sp->gfns);
 	kmem_cache_free(mmu_page_header_cache, sp);
 }
 
@@ -2126,7 +2112,6 @@  static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 	do {
 		sp = list_first_entry(invalid_list, struct kvm_mmu_page, link);
 		WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || sp->root_count);
-		kvm_mmu_isolate_page(sp);
 		kvm_mmu_free_page(sp);
 	} while (!list_empty(invalid_list));
 }