diff mbox

virtio_console: move early VQ enablement

Message ID 1413813529-11044-1-git-send-email-cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Cornelia Huck Oct. 20, 2014, 1:58 p.m. UTC
Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make
sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its
virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try
to set DRIVER_OK again when when a port is dynamically added after
the probe function is done.

Let's move virtio_device_ready() to the probe function just before
trying to use the virtqueues instead. This is fine as nothing can
fail inbetween.

Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael S. Tsirkin Oct. 20, 2014, 2:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make
> sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its
> virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try
> to set DRIVER_OK again when when a port is dynamically added after
> the probe function is done.
> 
> Let's move virtio_device_ready() to the probe function just before
> trying to use the virtqueues instead. This is fine as nothing can
> fail inbetween.
> 
> Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

Thanks!

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>


> ---
>  drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> index bfa6400..cf7a561 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
> @@ -1449,8 +1449,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
>  	spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
>  	init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
>  
> -	virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
> -
>  	/* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
>  	nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
>  	if (!nr_added_bufs) {
> @@ -2026,6 +2024,8 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	spin_lock_init(&portdev->ports_lock);
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&portdev->ports);
>  
> +	virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
> +
>  	if (multiport) {
>  		unsigned int nr_added_bufs;
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.5.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Josh Boyer Oct. 20, 2014, 5:09 p.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make
>> sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its
>> virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try
>> to set DRIVER_OK again when when a port is dynamically added after
>> the probe function is done.
>>
>> Let's move virtio_device_ready() to the probe function just before
>> trying to use the virtqueues instead. This is fine as nothing can
>> fail inbetween.
>>
>> Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

This fixed my KVM guest boot issue with 3.18-rc1.  Thanks for such a quick fix.

Tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>

josh

>> ---
>>  drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> index bfa6400..cf7a561 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
>> @@ -1449,8 +1449,6 @@ static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
>>       spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
>>       init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
>>
>> -     virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
>> -
>>       /* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
>>       nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
>>       if (!nr_added_bufs) {
>> @@ -2026,6 +2024,8 @@ static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>>       spin_lock_init(&portdev->ports_lock);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&portdev->ports);
>>
>> +     virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
>> +
>>       if (multiport) {
>>               unsigned int nr_added_bufs;
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.5.5
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Dave Airlie Nov. 11, 2014, 2:24 a.m. UTC | #3
On 21 October 2014 03:09, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:58:49PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> Commit f5866db6 (virtio_console: enable VQs early) tried to make
>>> sure that DRIVER_OK was set when virtio_console started using its
>>> virtqueues. Doing this in add_port(), however, means that we try
>>> to set DRIVER_OK again when when a port is dynamically added after
>>> the probe function is done.
>>>
>>> Let's move virtio_device_ready() to the probe function just before
>>> trying to use the virtqueues instead. This is fine as nothing can
>>> fail inbetween.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
>>> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>> Tested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
>
> This fixed my KVM guest boot issue with 3.18-rc1.  Thanks for such a quick fix.
>
> Tested-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org>

ping So who's merging this? Rusty?

still happens in -rc4.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
index bfa6400..cf7a561 100644
--- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
@@ -1449,8 +1449,6 @@  static int add_port(struct ports_device *portdev, u32 id)
 	spin_lock_init(&port->outvq_lock);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&port->waitqueue);
 
-	virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
-
 	/* Fill the in_vq with buffers so the host can send us data. */
 	nr_added_bufs = fill_queue(port->in_vq, &port->inbuf_lock);
 	if (!nr_added_bufs) {
@@ -2026,6 +2024,8 @@  static int virtcons_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
 	spin_lock_init(&portdev->ports_lock);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&portdev->ports);
 
+	virtio_device_ready(portdev->vdev);
+
 	if (multiport) {
 		unsigned int nr_added_bufs;