| Message ID | 1416765420-12057-3-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > This patch enables irqfd on arm. > > Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented > in vgic.c without routing. > > This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. > > KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability > automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > > --- > > v3 -> v4: > - reword commit message > - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq > - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier > - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string > - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq > - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch > - The rationale behind not supporting PPI irqfd injection is that > any device using a PPI would be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for > instance), so its state would have to be context-switched along with the > VCPU and would require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use > case for irqfds. this blob could go in the commit message. > - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready. > in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly > - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range > > v2 -> v3: > - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase > visibility > - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c > - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used > > v1 -> v2: > - rebase on 3.17rc1 > - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance > - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate > - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference) > - remove irq.h > --- > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 5 ++- > arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++ > arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ > arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- > arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 ++ > virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > index 7610eaa..4deccc0 100644 > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt > @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word). > 4.75 KVM_IRQFD > > Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD > -Architectures: x86 s390 > +Architectures: x86 s390 arm > Type: vm ioctl > Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in) > Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error > @@ -2232,6 +2232,9 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the > irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment > and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN. > > +On arm, the gsi must be a shared peripheral interrupt (SPI). > +This means the corresponding programmed GIC interrupt ID is gsi+32. > + On ARM, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is given by gsi + 32. > 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB > > Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > index 09ee408..77547bb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h > @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot { > /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */ > #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127 > > +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */ > +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1 > + > /* PSCI interface */ > #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e > #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n)) > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > index 9f581b1..e519a40 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ config KVM > select KVM_MMIO > select KVM_ARM_HOST > depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE > + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD > ---help--- > Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also > need to select one or more of the processor modules below. > @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS > config KVM_ARM_VGIC > bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC" > depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF > + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > default y > ---help--- > Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation. > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile > index f7057ed..859db09 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) > AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) > > KVM := ../../../virt/kvm > -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o > +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o > > obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o > obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o > diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > index 9e193c8..fb75af2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c > @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) > case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP: > r = vgic_present; > break; > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD > + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD: > +#endif > case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: > case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY: > case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU: > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > index 3aaca49..3417776 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c > @@ -1446,7 +1446,10 @@ epilog: > static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > u32 status = vgic_get_interrupt_status(vcpu); > + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; > bool level_pending = false; > + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; > + bool has_notifier; > > kvm_debug("STATUS = %08x\n", status); > > @@ -1463,6 +1466,7 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr); > WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq)); > > + spin_lock(&dist->lock); > vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq); > WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK); > vlr.state = 0; > @@ -1481,6 +1485,24 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq); > > + /* > + * Unlock the distributor since kvm_notify_acked_irq > + * will call kvm_set_irq to reset the IRQ level. > + * This latter attempts to grab dist->lock reset the IRQ level, and kvm_set_irq() grabs dist->lock. > + */ > + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); > + > + has_notifier = kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, > + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); > + > + if (has_notifier) { > + kvm_debug("Guest EOIed vIRQ %d on CPU %d\n", > + vlr.irq, vcpu->vcpu_id); > + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, > + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); > + } > + spin_lock(&dist->lock); shouldn't the lock/unlock be moved into the if statement and only cover kvm_notify_acked_irq ? > + > /* Any additional pending interrupt? */ > if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) { > vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq); > @@ -1490,6 +1512,8 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq); > } > > + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); > + > /* > * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have > * been marked as empty. > @@ -1554,14 +1578,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; > - > if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) > return; > > - spin_lock(&dist->lock); > __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(vcpu); > - spin_unlock(&dist->lock); > } > > int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -2477,3 +2497,47 @@ out_free_irq: > free_percpu_irq(vgic->maint_irq, kvm_get_running_vcpus()); > return ret; > } > + > +int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, > + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, > + int gsi) > +{ > + return gsi; > +} > + > +int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) > +{ > + return pin; > +} > + > +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) > +{ > + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; > + > + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); > + > + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { > + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) > + return -EINVAL; > + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); > + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { > + /* > + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is > + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called > + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed > + * by the guest > + */ > + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); > + return -EAGAIN; This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* MSI not implemented yet */ > +int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, > + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > + int level, bool line_status) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > -- > 1.9.1 > Thanks, -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> This patch enables irqfd on arm. >> >> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented >> in vgic.c without routing. >> >> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. >> >> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability >> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. >> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >> >> --- >> >> v3 -> v4: >> - reword commit message >> - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq >> - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier >> - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string >> - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq >> - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch >> - The rationale behind not supporting PPI irqfd injection is that >> any device using a PPI would be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for >> instance), so its state would have to be context-switched along with the >> VCPU and would require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use >> case for irqfds. > > this blob could go in the commit message. OK > >> - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready. >> in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly >> - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range >> >> v2 -> v3: >> - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase >> visibility >> - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c >> - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - rebase on 3.17rc1 >> - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance >> - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate >> - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference) >> - remove irq.h >> --- >> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 5 ++- >> arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++ >> arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ >> arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- >> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 ++ >> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >> index 7610eaa..4deccc0 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word). >> 4.75 KVM_IRQFD >> >> Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD >> -Architectures: x86 s390 >> +Architectures: x86 s390 arm >> Type: vm ioctl >> Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in) >> Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error >> @@ -2232,6 +2232,9 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the >> irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment >> and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN. >> >> +On arm, the gsi must be a shared peripheral interrupt (SPI). >> +This means the corresponding programmed GIC interrupt ID is gsi+32. >> + > > On ARM, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared > Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is > given by gsi + 32. OK > >> 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB >> >> Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> index 09ee408..77547bb 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot { >> /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */ >> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127 >> >> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */ >> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1 >> + >> /* PSCI interface */ >> #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e >> #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n)) >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> index 9f581b1..e519a40 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ config KVM >> select KVM_MMIO >> select KVM_ARM_HOST >> depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE >> + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD >> ---help--- >> Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also >> need to select one or more of the processor modules below. >> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS >> config KVM_ARM_VGIC >> bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC" >> depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF >> + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >> default y >> ---help--- >> Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >> index f7057ed..859db09 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) >> AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) >> >> KVM := ../../../virt/kvm >> -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o >> +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o >> >> obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o >> obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o >> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >> index 9e193c8..fb75af2 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) >> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP: >> r = vgic_present; >> break; >> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD: >> +#endif >> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: >> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY: >> case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU: >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> index 3aaca49..3417776 100644 >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >> @@ -1446,7 +1446,10 @@ epilog: >> static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> u32 status = vgic_get_interrupt_status(vcpu); >> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; >> bool level_pending = false; >> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; >> + bool has_notifier; >> >> kvm_debug("STATUS = %08x\n", status); >> >> @@ -1463,6 +1466,7 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr); >> WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq)); >> >> + spin_lock(&dist->lock); >> vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq); >> WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK); >> vlr.state = 0; >> @@ -1481,6 +1485,24 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> */ >> vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq); >> >> + /* >> + * Unlock the distributor since kvm_notify_acked_irq >> + * will call kvm_set_irq to reset the IRQ level. >> + * This latter attempts to grab dist->lock > > reset the IRQ level, and kvm_set_irq() grabs dist->lock. OK > >> + */ >> + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >> + >> + has_notifier = kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, >> + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); >> + >> + if (has_notifier) { >> + kvm_debug("Guest EOIed vIRQ %d on CPU %d\n", >> + vlr.irq, vcpu->vcpu_id); >> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, >> + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); >> + } >> + spin_lock(&dist->lock); > > shouldn't the lock/unlock be moved into the if statement and only cover > kvm_notify_acked_irq ? well this is unlock/lock and not lock/unlock sequence? We indeed must unlock only for kvm_notify_acked_irq. > >> + >> /* Any additional pending interrupt? */ >> if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) { >> vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq); >> @@ -1490,6 +1512,8 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq); >> } >> >> + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >> + >> /* >> * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have >> * been marked as empty. >> @@ -1554,14 +1578,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> { >> - struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; >> - >> if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) >> return; >> >> - spin_lock(&dist->lock); >> __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(vcpu); >> - spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >> } >> >> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> @@ -2477,3 +2497,47 @@ out_free_irq: >> free_percpu_irq(vgic->maint_irq, kvm_get_running_vcpus()); >> return ret; >> } >> + >> +int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, >> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, >> + int gsi) >> +{ >> + return gsi; >> +} >> + >> +int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) >> +{ >> + return pin; >> +} >> + >> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >> +{ >> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >> + >> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); >> + >> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { >> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { >> + /* >> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is >> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called >> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed >> + * by the guest >> + */ >> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); >> + return -EAGAIN; > > This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering > towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is > that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not > initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the > first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not entered yet any driver reset code. Best Regards Eric > >> + } >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +/* MSI not implemented yet */ >> +int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, >> + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >> + int level, bool line_status) >> +{ >> + return 0; >> +} >> -- >> 1.9.1 >> > > Thanks, > -Christoffer > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: > On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. >>> >>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented >>> in vgic.c without routing. >>> >>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. >>> >>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability >>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>> >>> --- >>> >>> v3 -> v4: >>> - reword commit message >>> - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq >>> - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier >>> - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string >>> - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq >>> - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch >>> - The rationale behind not supporting PPI irqfd injection is that >>> any device using a PPI would be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for >>> instance), so its state would have to be context-switched along with the >>> VCPU and would require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use >>> case for irqfds. >> >> this blob could go in the commit message. > OK >> >>> - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready. >>> in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly >>> - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range >>> >>> v2 -> v3: >>> - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase >>> visibility >>> - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c >>> - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used >>> >>> v1 -> v2: >>> - rebase on 3.17rc1 >>> - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance >>> - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate >>> - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference) >>> - remove irq.h >>> --- >>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 5 ++- >>> arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++ >>> arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ >>> arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- >>> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 ++ >>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- >>> 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >>> index 7610eaa..4deccc0 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt >>> @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word). >>> 4.75 KVM_IRQFD >>> >>> Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD >>> -Architectures: x86 s390 >>> +Architectures: x86 s390 arm >>> Type: vm ioctl >>> Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in) >>> Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error >>> @@ -2232,6 +2232,9 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the >>> irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment >>> and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN. >>> >>> +On arm, the gsi must be a shared peripheral interrupt (SPI). >>> +This means the corresponding programmed GIC interrupt ID is gsi+32. >>> + >> >> On ARM, the gsi field in the kvm_irqfd struct specifies the Shared >> Peripheral Interrupt (SPI) index, such that the GIC interrupt ID is >> given by gsi + 32. > OK >> >>> 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB >>> >>> Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >>> index 09ee408..77547bb 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h >>> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot { >>> /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */ >>> #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127 >>> >>> +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */ >>> +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1 >>> + >>> /* PSCI interface */ >>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e >>> #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n)) >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >>> index 9f581b1..e519a40 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig >>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ config KVM >>> select KVM_MMIO >>> select KVM_ARM_HOST >>> depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE >>> + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD >>> ---help--- >>> Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also >>> need to select one or more of the processor modules below. >>> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS >>> config KVM_ARM_VGIC >>> bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC" >>> depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF >>> + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >>> default y >>> ---help--- >>> Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation. >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >>> index f7057ed..859db09 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile >>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) >>> AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) >>> >>> KVM := ../../../virt/kvm >>> -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o >>> +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o >>> >>> obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o >>> obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >>> index 9e193c8..fb75af2 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c >>> @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) >>> case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP: >>> r = vgic_present; >>> break; >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD >>> + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD: >>> +#endif >>> case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: >>> case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY: >>> case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU: >>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >>> index 3aaca49..3417776 100644 >>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c >>> @@ -1446,7 +1446,10 @@ epilog: >>> static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> { >>> u32 status = vgic_get_interrupt_status(vcpu); >>> + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; >>> bool level_pending = false; >>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; >>> + bool has_notifier; >>> >>> kvm_debug("STATUS = %08x\n", status); >>> >>> @@ -1463,6 +1466,7 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr); >>> WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq)); >>> >>> + spin_lock(&dist->lock); >>> vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq); >>> WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK); >>> vlr.state = 0; >>> @@ -1481,6 +1485,24 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> */ >>> vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq); >>> >>> + /* >>> + * Unlock the distributor since kvm_notify_acked_irq >>> + * will call kvm_set_irq to reset the IRQ level. >>> + * This latter attempts to grab dist->lock >> >> reset the IRQ level, and kvm_set_irq() grabs dist->lock. > OK >> >>> + */ >>> + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >>> + >>> + has_notifier = kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, >>> + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); >>> + >>> + if (has_notifier) { >>> + kvm_debug("Guest EOIed vIRQ %d on CPU %d\n", >>> + vlr.irq, vcpu->vcpu_id); >>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, >>> + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); >>> + } >>> + spin_lock(&dist->lock); >> >> shouldn't the lock/unlock be moved into the if statement and only cover >> kvm_notify_acked_irq ? > well this is unlock/lock and not lock/unlock sequence? We indeed must > unlock only for kvm_notify_acked_irq. right, just leave it as is. >> >>> + >>> /* Any additional pending interrupt? */ >>> if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) { >>> vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq); >>> @@ -1490,6 +1512,8 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq); >>> } >>> >>> + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >>> + >>> /* >>> * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have >>> * been marked as empty. >>> @@ -1554,14 +1578,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> >>> void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> { >>> - struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; >>> - >>> if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) >>> return; >>> >>> - spin_lock(&dist->lock); >>> __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(vcpu); >>> - spin_unlock(&dist->lock); >>> } >>> >>> int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> @@ -2477,3 +2497,47 @@ out_free_irq: >>> free_percpu_irq(vgic->maint_irq, kvm_get_running_vcpus()); >>> return ret; >>> } >>> + >>> +int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, >>> + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, >>> + int gsi) >>> +{ >>> + return gsi; >>> +} >>> + >>> +int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) >>> +{ >>> + return pin; >>> +} >>> + >>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >>> +{ >>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >>> + >>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); >>> + >>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { >>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { >>> + /* >>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is >>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called >>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed >>> + * by the guest >>> + */ >>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); >>> + return -EAGAIN; >> >> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering >> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is >> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not >> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the >> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. > The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. > Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a > peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle > previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU > *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. > > Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could > be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the > same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. > > As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are > likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. > This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For > some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released > in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver > calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. > > I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge > that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. > > Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this > relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ > properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not > entered yet any driver reset code. > I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually running guest code. Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in compute_pending_for_cpu(). What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? Hopefully there is some way to defer wiring up the irqfd until the vgic is actually created. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Re-adding cc list] On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > On 11/24/2014 04:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: > >> On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > >>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. > >>>> > >>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented > >>>> in vgic.c without routing. > >>>> > >>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. > >>>> > >>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability > >>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > >>>> > >>>> --- [...] > >>>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > >>>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) > >>>> +{ > >>>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; > >>>> + > >>>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); > >>>> + > >>>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { > >>>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) > >>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); > >>>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { > >>>> + /* > >>>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is > >>>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called > >>>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed > >>>> + * by the guest > >>>> + */ > >>>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); > >>>> + return -EAGAIN; > >>> > >>> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering > >>> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is > >>> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not > >>> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the > >>> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. > >> The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. > >> Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a > >> peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle > >> previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU > >> *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. > >> > >> Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could > >> be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the > >> same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. > >> > >> As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are > >> likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. > >> This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For > >> some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released > >> in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver > >> calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. > >> > >> I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge > >> that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. > >> > >> Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this > >> relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ > >> properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not > >> entered yet any driver reset code. > >> > > I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time > > of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the > > sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually > > running guest code. > > Yes currently irqfd generic code has no way to test if the virtual > interrupt controller is "ready" (KVM__IRQFD -> kvm_irqfd_assign ) > because I guess other archs don't have the problem. > > > > Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after > > creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? > > I start VFIO signaling and setup KVM_IRQFD in a QEMU machine init done > notifier. the vgic init then must happen before then. have all the vcpus that QEMU wants to create, been created by then? > > Currently the VGIC KVM device has group/attributes that allow to set > registers (vgic_attr_regs_access) and *partially* init the state > (vgic_init_maps). Enhancing that we could indeed force the vgic init > earlier. > We would probably add a new attribute to the vgic device api if we were to go down that road. > > > > Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess > > with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, > > but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, > > hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in > > compute_pending_for_cpu(). > > yes we could indeed record a level info very early and not do anything > with it until the vgic is ready. This would oblige to init the level > bitmap yet in another earlier stage. there's an unsolved problem that you may not have created all your data structures or know how many IRQs you have at this point, right? > > > > What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq > > from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? > yes I unmask the IRQ so that it can hit again (it was deactivated by the > host and masked the VFIO platform driver). If I don't call the notifier > it will remain masked and never hit again. > Don't you simply loose the interrupt for edge-triggered interrupts then? -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/25/2014 11:19 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > [Re-adding cc list] > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> On 11/24/2014 04:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented >>>>>> in vgic.c without routing. >>>>>> >>>>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. >>>>>> >>>>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability >>>>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- > > [...] > >>>>>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >>>>>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >>>>>> +{ >>>>>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >>>>>> + >>>>>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); >>>>>> + >>>>>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { >>>>>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) >>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >>>>>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { >>>>>> + /* >>>>>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is >>>>>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called >>>>>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed >>>>>> + * by the guest >>>>>> + */ >>>>>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); >>>>>> + return -EAGAIN; >>>>> >>>>> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering >>>>> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is >>>>> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not >>>>> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the >>>>> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. >>>> The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. >>>> Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a >>>> peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle >>>> previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU >>>> *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. >>>> >>>> Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could >>>> be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the >>>> same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. >>>> >>>> As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are >>>> likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. >>>> This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For >>>> some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released >>>> in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver >>>> calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. >>>> >>>> I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge >>>> that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. >>>> >>>> Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this >>>> relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ >>>> properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not >>>> entered yet any driver reset code. >>>> >>> I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time >>> of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the >>> sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually >>> running guest code. >> >> Yes currently irqfd generic code has no way to test if the virtual >> interrupt controller is "ready" (KVM__IRQFD -> kvm_irqfd_assign ) >> because I guess other archs don't have the problem. >>> >>> Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after >>> creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? >> >> I start VFIO signaling and setup KVM_IRQFD in a QEMU machine init done >> notifier. the vgic init then must happen before then. > > have all the vcpus that QEMU wants to create, been created by then? Hi Christoffer, My understanding of QEMU start sequence is as follows: at machine init, CPU realize function is called for each CPU (target-arm/cpu.c arm_cpu_realizefn) qemu_init_vcpu (cpus.c) > qemu_kvm_start_vcpu (cpus.c) > launch VCPU thread (qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn) > kvm_init_vcpu kvm_init_vcpu does the while (1) loop issuing KVM_RUN ioctl if *cpu_can_run* cpu_can_run returns true when vm_start is called (resume_all_vcpus>cpu_resume) QEMU machine init done or reset callbacks happen after machine init and before vm_start. The actual vgic "readiness" is set in the first vcpu run, ie on the vm_start. vgic instantiation in virt machine file is done after cpu_instantiation. We could force vgic init at that time, in the gic realize fn (kvm_arm_gic_realize)?. All vcpus are instantiated: nr_vcpus and nr_irqs are known. Also base addresses are known. > >> >> Currently the VGIC KVM device has group/attributes that allow to set >> registers (vgic_attr_regs_access) and *partially* init the state >> (vgic_init_maps). Enhancing that we could indeed force the vgic init >> earlier. >> > > We would probably add a new attribute to the vgic device api if we were > to go down that road. yes > >>> >>> Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess >>> with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, >>> but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, >>> hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in >>> compute_pending_for_cpu(). >> >> yes we could indeed record a level info very early and not do anything >> with it until the vgic is ready. This would oblige to init the level >> bitmap yet in another earlier stage. > > there's an unsolved problem that you may not have created all your data > structures or know how many IRQs you have at this point, right? yes that's correct, at that time we do not know the nr_irqs. > >>> >>> What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq >>> from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? >> yes I unmask the IRQ so that it can hit again (it was deactivated by the >> host and masked the VFIO platform driver). If I don't call the notifier >> it will remain masked and never hit again. >> > Don't you simply loose the interrupt for edge-triggered interrupts then? yes we do. Even for level-sensitive, we loose them! But I think the core of the problem is why those IRQs do hit! And I now realize I did not have a good representation of what happens on the ctrl C of QEMU. the xgmac driver remove function is not called at all I guess (explaining why when hacking it to clear IRQ and disable IRQ it did not change anything :-( /me/ stupid). So the HW is left free running. Might happen a XGMAC IRQ was high at that time. When VFIO driver is released, it does not change the state of the XGMAC HW but this calls free_irq of the physical IRQ. When QEMU reloads the VFIO driver on the second time and call request_irq, it re-enables the IRQ at VGIC and XGMAC IRQ hit. The problem we observe relates to the lack of proper reset of the device - old discussion we had with Alex in Feb! -. Those IRQ relate to the HW state of the last QEMU session. It may be acceptable to ignore them until the guest duly resets the device. handling the IRQ in the new QEMU session may be wrong as well. Some devices might not understand why they get a functional IRQ while they are not even initialized! The other alternative is to implement some device dependent reset on host kernel side, some kind of kernel hook to the vfio driver but here it is another rough path ... Best Regards Eric > > -Christoffer > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/25/2014 02:12 PM, Eric Auger wrote: > On 11/25/2014 11:19 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >> [Re-adding cc list] >> >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>> On 11/24/2014 04:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>> On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented >>>>>>> in vgic.c without routing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability >>>>>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >> >> [...] >> >>>>>>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >>>>>>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { >>>>>>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >>>>>>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { >>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is >>>>>>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called >>>>>>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed >>>>>>> + * by the guest >>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); >>>>>>> + return -EAGAIN; >>>>>> >>>>>> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering >>>>>> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is >>>>>> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not >>>>>> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the >>>>>> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. >>>>> The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. >>>>> Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a >>>>> peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle >>>>> previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU >>>>> *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. >>>>> >>>>> Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could >>>>> be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the >>>>> same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. >>>>> >>>>> As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are >>>>> likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. >>>>> This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For >>>>> some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released >>>>> in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver >>>>> calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. >>>>> >>>>> I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge >>>>> that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. >>>>> >>>>> Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this >>>>> relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ >>>>> properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not >>>>> entered yet any driver reset code. >>>>> >>>> I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time >>>> of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the >>>> sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually >>>> running guest code. >>> >>> Yes currently irqfd generic code has no way to test if the virtual >>> interrupt controller is "ready" (KVM__IRQFD -> kvm_irqfd_assign ) >>> because I guess other archs don't have the problem. >>>> >>>> Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after >>>> creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? >>> >>> I start VFIO signaling and setup KVM_IRQFD in a QEMU machine init done >>> notifier. the vgic init then must happen before then. >> >> have all the vcpus that QEMU wants to create, been created by then? > Hi Christoffer, > > My understanding of QEMU start sequence is as follows: > at machine init, CPU realize function is called for each CPU > (target-arm/cpu.c arm_cpu_realizefn) > qemu_init_vcpu (cpus.c) > qemu_kvm_start_vcpu (cpus.c) > launch VCPU > thread (qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn) > kvm_init_vcpu > kvm_init_vcpu does the while (1) loop issuing KVM_RUN ioctl if *cpu_can_run* > > cpu_can_run returns true when vm_start is called > (resume_all_vcpus>cpu_resume) > > QEMU machine init done or reset callbacks happen after machine init and > before vm_start. > > The actual vgic "readiness" is set in the first vcpu run, ie on the > vm_start. > > vgic instantiation in virt machine file is done after cpu_instantiation. > We could force vgic init at that time, in the gic realize fn > (kvm_arm_gic_realize)?. All vcpus are instantiated: nr_vcpus and nr_irqs > are known. Also base addresses are known. > >> >>> >>> Currently the VGIC KVM device has group/attributes that allow to set >>> registers (vgic_attr_regs_access) and *partially* init the state >>> (vgic_init_maps). Enhancing that we could indeed force the vgic init >>> earlier. >>> >> >> We would probably add a new attribute to the vgic device api if we were >> to go down that road. > yes >> >>>> >>>> Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess >>>> with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, >>>> but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, >>>> hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in >>>> compute_pending_for_cpu(). >>> >>> yes we could indeed record a level info very early and not do anything >>> with it until the vgic is ready. This would oblige to init the level >>> bitmap yet in another earlier stage. >> >> there's an unsolved problem that you may not have created all your data >> structures or know how many IRQs you have at this point, right? > yes that's correct, at that time we do not know the nr_irqs. >> >>>> >>>> What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq >>>> from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? >>> yes I unmask the IRQ so that it can hit again (it was deactivated by the >>> host and masked the VFIO platform driver). If I don't call the notifier >>> it will remain masked and never hit again. >>> >> Don't you simply loose the interrupt for edge-triggered interrupts then? > yes we do. Even for level-sensitive, we loose them! > > But I think the core of the problem is why those IRQs do hit! And I now > realize I did not have a good representation of what happens on the ctrl > C of QEMU. the xgmac driver remove function is not called at all I guess > (explaining why when hacking it to clear IRQ and disable IRQ it did not > change anything :-( /me/ stupid). So the HW is left free running. Might > happen a XGMAC IRQ was high at that time. When VFIO driver is released, > it does not change the state of the XGMAC HW but this calls free_irq of > the physical IRQ. When QEMU reloads the VFIO driver on the second time > and call request_irq, it re-enables the IRQ at VGIC and XGMAC IRQ hit. > > The problem we observe relates to the lack of proper reset of the device > - old discussion we had with Alex in Feb! -. > > Those IRQ relate to the HW state of the last QEMU session. It may be > acceptable to ignore them until the guest duly resets the device. > handling the IRQ in the new QEMU session may be wrong as well. Some > devices might not understand why they get a functional IRQ while they > are not even initialized! not that this is also what happens in my implementation since as soon as the guest driver does request_irq it might get an unexpected IRQ. It works on xgmac but sure it works on another? > > The other alternative is to implement some device dependent reset on > host kernel side, some kind of kernel hook to the vfio driver but here > it is another rough path ... Another solution would be to advise the usage of a host-side user driver just to clean the state of the HW device in such a case. Laziness? Eric > > Best Regards > > Eric > > > > >> >> -Christoffer >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > On 11/25/2014 11:19 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > > [Re-adding cc list] > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > >> On 11/24/2014 04:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: > >>>> On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: > >>>>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented > >>>>>> in vgic.c without routing. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability > >>>>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> --- > > > > [...] > > > >>>>>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, > >>>>>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) > >>>>>> +{ > >>>>>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { > >>>>>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) > >>>>>> + return -EINVAL; > >>>>>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); > >>>>>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { > >>>>>> + /* > >>>>>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is > >>>>>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called > >>>>>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed > >>>>>> + * by the guest > >>>>>> + */ > >>>>>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); > >>>>>> + return -EAGAIN; > >>>>> > >>>>> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering > >>>>> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is > >>>>> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not > >>>>> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the > >>>>> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. > >>>> The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. > >>>> Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a > >>>> peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle > >>>> previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU > >>>> *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. > >>>> > >>>> Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could > >>>> be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the > >>>> same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. > >>>> > >>>> As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are > >>>> likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. > >>>> This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For > >>>> some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released > >>>> in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver > >>>> calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. > >>>> > >>>> I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge > >>>> that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. > >>>> > >>>> Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this > >>>> relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ > >>>> properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not > >>>> entered yet any driver reset code. > >>>> > >>> I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time > >>> of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the > >>> sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually > >>> running guest code. > >> > >> Yes currently irqfd generic code has no way to test if the virtual > >> interrupt controller is "ready" (KVM__IRQFD -> kvm_irqfd_assign ) > >> because I guess other archs don't have the problem. > >>> > >>> Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after > >>> creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? > >> > >> I start VFIO signaling and setup KVM_IRQFD in a QEMU machine init done > >> notifier. the vgic init then must happen before then. > > > > have all the vcpus that QEMU wants to create, been created by then? > Hi Christoffer, > > My understanding of QEMU start sequence is as follows: > at machine init, CPU realize function is called for each CPU > (target-arm/cpu.c arm_cpu_realizefn) > qemu_init_vcpu (cpus.c) > qemu_kvm_start_vcpu (cpus.c) > launch VCPU > thread (qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn) > kvm_init_vcpu > kvm_init_vcpu does the while (1) loop issuing KVM_RUN ioctl if *cpu_can_run* > > cpu_can_run returns true when vm_start is called > (resume_all_vcpus>cpu_resume) > > QEMU machine init done or reset callbacks happen after machine init and > before vm_start. > > The actual vgic "readiness" is set in the first vcpu run, ie on the > vm_start. > > vgic instantiation in virt machine file is done after cpu_instantiation. > We could force vgic init at that time, in the gic realize fn > (kvm_arm_gic_realize)?. All vcpus are instantiated: nr_vcpus and nr_irqs > are known. Also base addresses are known. > > > > >> > >> Currently the VGIC KVM device has group/attributes that allow to set > >> registers (vgic_attr_regs_access) and *partially* init the state > >> (vgic_init_maps). Enhancing that we could indeed force the vgic init > >> earlier. > >> > > > > We would probably add a new attribute to the vgic device api if we were > > to go down that road. > yes > > > >>> > >>> Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess > >>> with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, > >>> but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, > >>> hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in > >>> compute_pending_for_cpu(). > >> > >> yes we could indeed record a level info very early and not do anything > >> with it until the vgic is ready. This would oblige to init the level > >> bitmap yet in another earlier stage. > > > > there's an unsolved problem that you may not have created all your data > > structures or know how many IRQs you have at this point, right? > yes that's correct, at that time we do not know the nr_irqs. > > > >>> > >>> What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq > >>> from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? > >> yes I unmask the IRQ so that it can hit again (it was deactivated by the > >> host and masked the VFIO platform driver). If I don't call the notifier > >> it will remain masked and never hit again. > >> > > Don't you simply loose the interrupt for edge-triggered interrupts then? > yes we do. Even for level-sensitive, we loose them! for level-sensitive you can ack the interrupt and it will fire again, so you'll eventually notify your guest. For edge-triggered interrupts, your current code will ack it, it will not fire again, the guest will never know it hit, and everything may stop. > > But I think the core of the problem is why those IRQs do hit! And I now > realize I did not have a good representation of what happens on the ctrl > C of QEMU. the xgmac driver remove function is not called at all I guess > (explaining why when hacking it to clear IRQ and disable IRQ it did not > change anything :-( /me/ stupid). So the HW is left free running. Might > happen a XGMAC IRQ was high at that time. When VFIO driver is released, > it does not change the state of the XGMAC HW but this calls free_irq of > the physical IRQ. When QEMU reloads the VFIO driver on the second time > and call request_irq, it re-enables the IRQ at VGIC and XGMAC IRQ hit. > > The problem we observe relates to the lack of proper reset of the device > - old discussion we had with Alex in Feb! -. > > Those IRQ relate to the HW state of the last QEMU session. It may be > acceptable to ignore them until the guest duly resets the device. > handling the IRQ in the new QEMU session may be wrong as well. Some > devices might not understand why they get a functional IRQ while they > are not even initialized! > > The other alternative is to implement some device dependent reset on > host kernel side, some kind of kernel hook to the vfio driver but here > it is another rough path ... > I can't see how reset ties into this specific problem. To summarize, I think you need to find a way to not enable irqfd for an interrupt before the vgic is ready, and when the vgic is ready, (regardless of the guest is running or not, or if the device is reset or not) then you can always accept an incoming interrupt and the guest will see it when it enables the interrupt and its gic (the vgic that is). Taking a step back, this seems like the obvious approach, because a hardware GIC implementation also doesn't say "hey, my CPUs aren't up yet, so I'm going to return an error to your raised CPU line and/or defer crazy stuff". The signal is just going to set the interrupt pending on the distributor, and we need to make sure that whenever we enable this stuff, we follow those semantics. -Christoffer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/26/2014 12:31 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >> On 11/25/2014 11:19 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>> [Re-adding cc list] >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 05:42:30PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>>> On 11/24/2014 04:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 11/24/2014 11:00 AM, Christoffer Dall wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 06:56:59PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>>>>> This patch enables irqfd on arm. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented >>>>>>>> in vgic.c without routing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability >>>>>>>> automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> --- >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>>>> +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, >>>>>>>> + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) >>>>>>>> +{ >>>>>>>> + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { >>>>>>>> + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) >>>>>>>> + return -EINVAL; >>>>>>>> + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); >>>>>>>> + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { >>>>>>>> + /* >>>>>>>> + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is >>>>>>>> + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called >>>>>>>> + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed >>>>>>>> + * by the guest >>>>>>>> + */ >>>>>>>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); >>>>>>>> + return -EAGAIN; >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This looks fishy, I don't fully understand which case you're catering >>>>>>> towards here (the comment is hard to understand), but my gut feeling is >>>>>>> that you should back out (probably with an error) if the vgic is not >>>>>>> initialized when calling this function. Setting up the routing in the >>>>>>> first place should probably error out if the vgic is not available. >>>>>> The issue is related to integration with QEMU and VFIO. >>>>>> Currently VFIO signaling (we tell VFIO to signal the eventfd on a >>>>>> peculiar physical IRQ) and irqfd setup (we tell KVM/IRQFD to handle >>>>>> previous eventfd when triggered and inject a GSI) are done by QEMU >>>>>> *before* the first vcpu run. so before VGIC is ready. >>>>>> >>>>>> Both are done in a so called QEMU machine init done notifier. It could >>>>>> be done in a QEMU reset notifier but I guess the problem would be the >>>>>> same. and I think the same at which QEMU initializes it is correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> As soon as both VFIO signaling and irqfd are setup, virtual IRQ are >>>>>> likely to be injected and this is what happens on some circumstances. >>>>>> This happens on the 2d QEMU run after killing the 1st QEMU session. For >>>>>> some reason I guess the HW device - in my case the xgmac - was released >>>>>> in such a way the IRQ wire was not reset. So as soon as VFIO driver >>>>>> calls request_irq, the IRQ hits. >>>>>> >>>>>> I tried to change that this xgmac driver behavior but I must acknowledge >>>>>> that for the time beeing I failed. I will continue investigating that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed I might be fixing the issue at the wrong place. But anyway this >>>>>> relies on the fact the assigned device driver toggled down the IRQ >>>>>> properly when releasing. At the time the signaling is setup we have not >>>>>> entered yet any driver reset code. >>>>>> >>>>> I see, it's because of the quirky way we initialize the vgic at time >>>>> of running the first CPU, so user space can't really hook into the >>>>> sweet spot after initializing the vgic but just before actually >>>>> running guest code. >>>> >>>> Yes currently irqfd generic code has no way to test if the virtual >>>> interrupt controller is "ready" (KVM__IRQFD -> kvm_irqfd_assign ) >>>> because I guess other archs don't have the problem. >>>>> >>>>> Could it be that we simply need to let user space init the vgic after >>>>> creating all its vcpus and only then allow setting up the irqfd? >>>> >>>> I start VFIO signaling and setup KVM_IRQFD in a QEMU machine init done >>>> notifier. the vgic init then must happen before then. >>> >>> have all the vcpus that QEMU wants to create, been created by then? >> Hi Christoffer, >> >> My understanding of QEMU start sequence is as follows: >> at machine init, CPU realize function is called for each CPU >> (target-arm/cpu.c arm_cpu_realizefn) >> qemu_init_vcpu (cpus.c) > qemu_kvm_start_vcpu (cpus.c) > launch VCPU >> thread (qemu_kvm_cpu_thread_fn) > kvm_init_vcpu >> kvm_init_vcpu does the while (1) loop issuing KVM_RUN ioctl if *cpu_can_run* >> >> cpu_can_run returns true when vm_start is called >> (resume_all_vcpus>cpu_resume) >> >> QEMU machine init done or reset callbacks happen after machine init and >> before vm_start. >> >> The actual vgic "readiness" is set in the first vcpu run, ie on the >> vm_start. >> >> vgic instantiation in virt machine file is done after cpu_instantiation. >> We could force vgic init at that time, in the gic realize fn >> (kvm_arm_gic_realize)?. All vcpus are instantiated: nr_vcpus and nr_irqs >> are known. Also base addresses are known. >> >>> >>>> >>>> Currently the VGIC KVM device has group/attributes that allow to set >>>> registers (vgic_attr_regs_access) and *partially* init the state >>>> (vgic_init_maps). Enhancing that we could indeed force the vgic init >>>> earlier. >>>> >>> >>> We would probably add a new attribute to the vgic device api if we were >>> to go down that road. >> yes >>> >>>>> >>>>> Alternatively we can refactor the whole thing so that we don't mess >>>>> with the pending state etc. directly in the vgic_update_irq function, >>>>> but just sets the level state (or remember that there was an edge, >>>>> hummm, maybe not) and later propagate this to the vcpus in >>>>> compute_pending_for_cpu(). >>>> >>>> yes we could indeed record a level info very early and not do anything >>>> with it until the vgic is ready. This would oblige to init the level >>>> bitmap yet in another earlier stage. >>> >>> there's an unsolved problem that you may not have created all your data >>> structures or know how many IRQs you have at this point, right? >> yes that's correct, at that time we do not know the nr_irqs. >>> >>>>> >>>>> What you're doing here is to continously ack and re-request the irq >>>>> from the vfio driver until you are ready to receive it, is that right? >>>> yes I unmask the IRQ so that it can hit again (it was deactivated by the >>>> host and masked the VFIO platform driver). If I don't call the notifier >>>> it will remain masked and never hit again. >>>> >>> Don't you simply loose the interrupt for edge-triggered interrupts then? >> yes we do. Even for level-sensitive, we loose them! > > for level-sensitive you can ack the interrupt and it will fire again, so > you'll eventually notify your guest. For edge-triggered interrupts, > your current code will ack it, it will not fire again, the guest will > never know it hit, and everything may stop. > >> >> But I think the core of the problem is why those IRQs do hit! And I now >> realize I did not have a good representation of what happens on the ctrl >> C of QEMU. the xgmac driver remove function is not called at all I guess >> (explaining why when hacking it to clear IRQ and disable IRQ it did not >> change anything :-( /me/ stupid). So the HW is left free running. Might >> happen a XGMAC IRQ was high at that time. When VFIO driver is released, >> it does not change the state of the XGMAC HW but this calls free_irq of >> the physical IRQ. When QEMU reloads the VFIO driver on the second time >> and call request_irq, it re-enables the IRQ at VGIC and XGMAC IRQ hit. >> >> The problem we observe relates to the lack of proper reset of the device >> - old discussion we had with Alex in Feb! -. >> >> Those IRQ relate to the HW state of the last QEMU session. It may be >> acceptable to ignore them until the guest duly resets the device. >> handling the IRQ in the new QEMU session may be wrong as well. Some >> devices might not understand why they get a functional IRQ while they >> are not even initialized! >> >> The other alternative is to implement some device dependent reset on >> host kernel side, some kind of kernel hook to the vfio driver but here >> it is another rough path ... >> > > I can't see how reset ties into this specific problem. > > To summarize, I think you need to find a way to not enable irqfd for an > interrupt before the vgic is ready, and when the vgic is ready, > (regardless of the guest is running or not, or if the device is reset or > not) then you can always accept an incoming interrupt and the guest will > see it when it enables the interrupt and its gic (the vgic that is). Well, - in that case I need to touch the generic part of irqfd.c and add a arch hook to test the virtual interrupt controller state. - then the problem is moved to QEMU. How to detect when to setup VFIO signaling + IRQFD? ideally it would be simpler to force the VGIC initialization before the actual vm_start, after instantiation of the KVM device? Requires addition of an attribute for that at KVM device. In case we keep the current initialization model (on first vcpu run), I need to use some timer (?). - somehow this is not only a problem of irqfd but rather a problem of VFIO. When you do not use irqfd and handle the eventfd on user-side you also inject virtual IRQs in the vgic. I think the scheduling model of QEMU make it work but isn't it by chance? Best Regards Eric > > Taking a step back, this seems like the obvious approach, because > a hardware GIC implementation also doesn't say "hey, my CPUs aren't up > yet, so I'm going to return an error to your raised CPU line and/or > defer crazy stuff". The signal is just going to set the interrupt > pending on the distributor, and we need to make sure that whenever we > enable this stuff, we follow those semantics. > > -Christoffer > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt index 7610eaa..4deccc0 100644 --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt @@ -2206,7 +2206,7 @@ into the hash PTE second double word). 4.75 KVM_IRQFD Capability: KVM_CAP_IRQFD -Architectures: x86 s390 +Architectures: x86 s390 arm Type: vm ioctl Parameters: struct kvm_irqfd (in) Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error @@ -2232,6 +2232,9 @@ Note that closing the resamplefd is not sufficient to disable the irqfd. The KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_RESAMPLE is only necessary on assignment and need not be specified with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_DEASSIGN. +On arm, the gsi must be a shared peripheral interrupt (SPI). +This means the corresponding programmed GIC interrupt ID is gsi+32. + 4.76 KVM_PPC_ALLOCATE_HTAB Capability: KVM_CAP_PPC_ALLOC_HTAB diff --git a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h index 09ee408..77547bb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot { /* Highest supported SPI, from VGIC_NR_IRQS */ #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_GIC_MAX 127 +/* One single KVM irqchip, ie. the VGIC */ +#define KVM_NR_IRQCHIPS 1 + /* PSCI interface */ #define KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE 0x95c1ba5e #define KVM_PSCI_FN(n) (KVM_PSCI_FN_BASE + (n)) diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig index 9f581b1..e519a40 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ config KVM select KVM_MMIO select KVM_ARM_HOST depends on ARM_VIRT_EXT && ARM_LPAE + select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD ---help--- Support hosting virtualized guest machines. You will also need to select one or more of the processor modules below. @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ config KVM_ARM_MAX_VCPUS config KVM_ARM_VGIC bool "KVM support for Virtual GIC" depends on KVM_ARM_HOST && OF + select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD default y ---help--- Adds support for a hardware assisted, in-kernel GIC emulation. diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile index f7057ed..859db09 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/Makefile @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ AFLAGS_init.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) AFLAGS_interrupts.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a$(plus_virt) KVM := ../../../virt/kvm -kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o +kvm-arm-y = $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/eventfd.o obj-y += kvm-arm.o init.o interrupts.o obj-y += arm.o handle_exit.o guest.o mmu.o emulate.o reset.o diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c index 9e193c8..fb75af2 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c @@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext) case KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP: r = vgic_present; break; +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD + case KVM_CAP_IRQFD: +#endif case KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL: case KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY: case KVM_CAP_SYNC_MMU: diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c index 3aaca49..3417776 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c @@ -1446,7 +1446,10 @@ epilog: static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { u32 status = vgic_get_interrupt_status(vcpu); + struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; bool level_pending = false; + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm; + bool has_notifier; kvm_debug("STATUS = %08x\n", status); @@ -1463,6 +1466,7 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) struct vgic_lr vlr = vgic_get_lr(vcpu, lr); WARN_ON(vgic_irq_is_edge(vcpu, vlr.irq)); + spin_lock(&dist->lock); vgic_irq_clear_queued(vcpu, vlr.irq); WARN_ON(vlr.state & LR_STATE_MASK); vlr.state = 0; @@ -1481,6 +1485,24 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ vgic_dist_irq_clear_soft_pend(vcpu, vlr.irq); + /* + * Unlock the distributor since kvm_notify_acked_irq + * will call kvm_set_irq to reset the IRQ level. + * This latter attempts to grab dist->lock + */ + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); + + has_notifier = kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + + if (has_notifier) { + kvm_debug("Guest EOIed vIRQ %d on CPU %d\n", + vlr.irq, vcpu->vcpu_id); + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, + vlr.irq - VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS); + } + spin_lock(&dist->lock); + /* Any additional pending interrupt? */ if (vgic_dist_irq_get_level(vcpu, vlr.irq)) { vgic_cpu_irq_set(vcpu, vlr.irq); @@ -1490,6 +1512,8 @@ static bool vgic_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vgic_cpu_irq_clear(vcpu, vlr.irq); } + spin_unlock(&dist->lock); + /* * Despite being EOIed, the LR may not have * been marked as empty. @@ -1554,14 +1578,10 @@ void kvm_vgic_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) void kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic; - if (!irqchip_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm)) return; - spin_lock(&dist->lock); __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate(vcpu); - spin_unlock(&dist->lock); } int kvm_vgic_vcpu_pending_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -2477,3 +2497,47 @@ out_free_irq: free_percpu_irq(vgic->maint_irq, kvm_get_running_vcpus()); return ret; } + +int kvm_irq_map_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *entries, + int gsi) +{ + return gsi; +} + +int kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin) +{ + return pin; +} + +int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, + u32 irq, int level, bool line_status) +{ + unsigned int spi = irq + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS; + + kvm_debug("irqfd sets vIRQ %d to %d\n", irq, level); + + if (likely(vgic_initialized(kvm))) { + if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs) + return -EINVAL; + return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level); + } else if (level && kvm_irq_has_notifier(kvm, 0, irq)) { + /* + * any IRQ injected before vgic readiness is + * ignored and the notifier, if any, is called + * immediately as if the virtual IRQ were completed + * by the guest + */ + kvm_notify_acked_irq(kvm, 0, irq); + return -EAGAIN; + } + return 0; +} + +/* MSI not implemented yet */ +int kvm_set_msi(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e, + struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id, + int level, bool line_status) +{ + return 0; +}
This patch enables irqfd on arm. Both irqfd and resamplefd are supported. Injection is implemented in vgic.c without routing. This patch enables CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD and CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD. KVM_CAP_IRQFD is now advertised. KVM_CAP_IRQFD_RESAMPLE capability automatically is advertised as soon as CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQFD is set. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- v3 -> v4: - reword commit message - explain why we unlock the distributor before calling kvm_notify_acked_irq - rename is_assigned_irq into has_notifier - change EOI and injection kvm_debug format string - remove error local variable in kvm_set_irq - Move HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP unset in a separate patch - The rationale behind not supporting PPI irqfd injection is that any device using a PPI would be a private-to-the-CPU device (timer for instance), so its state would have to be context-switched along with the VCPU and would require in-kernel wiring anyhow. It is not a relevant use case for irqfds. - handle case were the irqfd injection is attempted before the vgic is ready. in such a case the notifier, if any, is called immediatly - use nr_irqs to test spi is within correct range v2 -> v3: - removal of irq.h from eventfd.c put in a separate patch to increase visibility - properly expose KVM_CAP_IRQFD capability in arm.c - remove CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP meaningfull only if irq_comm.c is used v1 -> v2: - rebase on 3.17rc1 - move of the dist unlock in process_maintenance - remove of dist lock in __kvm_vgic_sync_hwstate - rewording of the commit message (add resamplefd reference) - remove irq.h --- Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 5 ++- arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 3 ++ arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm/kvm/Makefile | 2 +- arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 3 ++ virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 6 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)