diff mbox

[v3,10/11] KVM: arm/arm64: prepare GICv3 emulation to use kvm_io_bus MMIO handling

Message ID 1427380778-942-11-git-send-email-andre.przywara@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Andre Przywara March 26, 2015, 2:39 p.m. UTC
Using the framework provided by the recent vgic.c changes, we
register a kvm_io_bus device on mapping the virtual GICv3 resources.
The distributor mapping is pretty straight forward, but the
redistributors need some more love, since they need to be tagged with
the respective redistributor (read: VCPU) they are connected with.
We use the kvm_io_bus framework to register one devices per VCPU.

Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
---
 include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |    1 +
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Marc Zyngier March 26, 2015, 10:06 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:37 +0000
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:

> Using the framework provided by the recent vgic.c changes, we
> register a kvm_io_bus device on mapping the virtual GICv3 resources.
> The distributor mapping is pretty straight forward, but the
> redistributors need some more love, since they need to be tagged with
> the respective redistributor (read: VCPU) they are connected with.
> We use the kvm_io_bus framework to register one devices per VCPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> ---
>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |    1 +
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> index 4523984..d6705f4 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct vgic_dist {
>  
>  	struct vgic_vm_ops	vm_ops;
>  	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
> +	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
>  };
>  
>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> index 2f03a36..eb1a797 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> @@ -758,6 +758,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
>  {
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	gpa_t rdbase = dist->vgic_redist_base;
> +	struct vgic_io_device *iodevs = NULL;
> +	int i;
>  
>  	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
>  		return 0;
> @@ -783,7 +786,41 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	kvm->arch.vgic.ready = true;
> +	ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base,
> +				       GIC_V3_DIST_SIZE, vgic_v3_dist_ranges,
> +				       -1, &dist->dist_iodev);

> +	if (ret)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	iodevs = kcalloc(dist->nr_cpus, sizeof(iodevs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!iodevs) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_unregister;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dist->nr_cpus; i++) {
> +		ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, rdbase,
> +					       SZ_128K, vgic_redist_ranges,
> +					       i, &iodevs[i]);

This looks really weird. You seems to be mapping all redistributors at
the same IPA. Have you actually tested this with an SMP guest?

Or maybe I don't get how this works?

	M.
Andre Przywara March 27, 2015, 12:14 a.m. UTC | #2
On 03/26/2015 10:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:37 +0000
> Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Using the framework provided by the recent vgic.c changes, we
>> register a kvm_io_bus device on mapping the virtual GICv3 resources.
>> The distributor mapping is pretty straight forward, but the
>> redistributors need some more love, since they need to be tagged with
>> the respective redistributor (read: VCPU) they are connected with.
>> We use the kvm_io_bus framework to register one devices per VCPU.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |    1 +
>>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> index 4523984..d6705f4 100644
>> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
>> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct vgic_dist {
>>  
>>  	struct vgic_vm_ops	vm_ops;
>>  	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
>> +	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
>>  };
>>  
>>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
>> index 2f03a36..eb1a797 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
>> @@ -758,6 +758,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  {
>>  	int ret = 0;
>>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
>> +	gpa_t rdbase = dist->vgic_redist_base;
>> +	struct vgic_io_device *iodevs = NULL;
>> +	int i;
>>  
>>  	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
>>  		return 0;
>> @@ -783,7 +786,41 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
>>  		goto out;
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	kvm->arch.vgic.ready = true;
>> +	ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base,
>> +				       GIC_V3_DIST_SIZE, vgic_v3_dist_ranges,
>> +				       -1, &dist->dist_iodev);
> 
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	iodevs = kcalloc(dist->nr_cpus, sizeof(iodevs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!iodevs) {
>> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +		goto out_unregister;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < dist->nr_cpus; i++) {
>> +		ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, rdbase,
>> +					       SZ_128K, vgic_redist_ranges,
>> +					       i, &iodevs[i]);
> 
> This looks really weird. You seems to be mapping all redistributors at
> the same IPA. Have you actually tested this with an SMP guest?

But the patch continues:

+		if (ret)
+			goto out_unregister;
+		rdbase += GIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;

Is that too confusing to re-use the rdbase variable? The spec speaks of
RD_base for each redistributor, so that seemed sane to me.
Shall I add a comment or use "rdbase + i * GIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE" for clarity?

Cheers,
Andre.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Marc Zyngier March 27, 2015, 7:34 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 00:14:12 +0000
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:

> On 03/26/2015 10:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:39:37 +0000
> > Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Using the framework provided by the recent vgic.c changes, we
> >> register a kvm_io_bus device on mapping the virtual GICv3 resources.
> >> The distributor mapping is pretty straight forward, but the
> >> redistributors need some more love, since they need to be tagged with
> >> the respective redistributor (read: VCPU) they are connected with.
> >> We use the kvm_io_bus framework to register one devices per VCPU.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  include/kvm/arm_vgic.h      |    1 +
> >>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> index 4523984..d6705f4 100644
> >> --- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
> >> @@ -252,6 +252,7 @@ struct vgic_dist {
> >>  
> >>  	struct vgic_vm_ops	vm_ops;
> >>  	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
> >> +	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
> >>  };
> >>  
> >>  struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
> >> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> >> index 2f03a36..eb1a797 100644
> >> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> >> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
> >> @@ -758,6 +758,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
> >>  {
> >>  	int ret = 0;
> >>  	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> >> +	gpa_t rdbase = dist->vgic_redist_base;
> >> +	struct vgic_io_device *iodevs = NULL;
> >> +	int i;
> >>  
> >>  	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
> >>  		return 0;
> >> @@ -783,7 +786,41 @@ static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
> >>  		goto out;
> >>  	}
> >>  
> >> -	kvm->arch.vgic.ready = true;
> >> +	ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base,
> >> +				       GIC_V3_DIST_SIZE, vgic_v3_dist_ranges,
> >> +				       -1, &dist->dist_iodev);
> > 
> >> +	if (ret)
> >> +		goto out;
> >> +
> >> +	iodevs = kcalloc(dist->nr_cpus, sizeof(iodevs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +	if (!iodevs) {
> >> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> >> +		goto out_unregister;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < dist->nr_cpus; i++) {
> >> +		ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, rdbase,
> >> +					       SZ_128K, vgic_redist_ranges,
> >> +					       i, &iodevs[i]);
> > 
> > This looks really weird. You seems to be mapping all redistributors at
> > the same IPA. Have you actually tested this with an SMP guest?
> 
> But the patch continues:
> 
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out_unregister;
> +		rdbase += GIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
> 
> Is that too confusing to re-use the rdbase variable? The spec speaks of
> RD_base for each redistributor, so that seemed sane to me.
> Shall I add a comment or use "rdbase + i * GIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE" for clarity?

That would have been nicer, but let's face the harsh truth: I can't
read, ignore me (well, for this time only ;-).

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
Christoffer Dall March 27, 2015, 4:01 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:39:37PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Using the framework provided by the recent vgic.c changes, we
> register a kvm_io_bus device on mapping the virtual GICv3 resources.
> The distributor mapping is pretty straight forward, but the
> redistributors need some more love, since they need to be tagged with
> the respective redistributor (read: VCPU) they are connected with.
> We use the kvm_io_bus framework to register one devices per VCPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
index 4523984..d6705f4 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_vgic.h
@@ -252,6 +252,7 @@  struct vgic_dist {
 
 	struct vgic_vm_ops	vm_ops;
 	struct vgic_io_device	dist_iodev;
+	struct vgic_io_device	*redist_iodevs;
 };
 
 struct vgic_v2_cpu_if {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
index 2f03a36..eb1a797 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic-v3-emul.c
@@ -758,6 +758,9 @@  static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
 {
 	int ret = 0;
 	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
+	gpa_t rdbase = dist->vgic_redist_base;
+	struct vgic_io_device *iodevs = NULL;
+	int i;
 
 	if (!irqchip_in_kernel(kvm))
 		return 0;
@@ -783,7 +786,41 @@  static int vgic_v3_map_resources(struct kvm *kvm,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	kvm->arch.vgic.ready = true;
+	ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, dist->vgic_dist_base,
+				       GIC_V3_DIST_SIZE, vgic_v3_dist_ranges,
+				       -1, &dist->dist_iodev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	iodevs = kcalloc(dist->nr_cpus, sizeof(iodevs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!iodevs) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out_unregister;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < dist->nr_cpus; i++) {
+		ret = vgic_register_kvm_io_dev(kvm, rdbase,
+					       SZ_128K, vgic_redist_ranges,
+					       i, &iodevs[i]);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out_unregister;
+		rdbase += GIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
+	}
+
+	dist->redist_iodevs = iodevs;
+	dist->ready = true;
+	goto out;
+
+out_unregister:
+	kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS, &dist->dist_iodev.dev);
+	if (iodevs) {
+		for (i = 0; i < dist->nr_cpus; i++) {
+			if (iodevs[i].dev.ops)
+				kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(kvm, KVM_MMIO_BUS,
+							  &iodevs[i].dev);
+		}
+	}
+
 out:
 	if (ret)
 		kvm_vgic_destroy(kvm);