| Message ID | 1505513994-77939-2-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On Fri, Sep 15 2017 at 3:19:48 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> wrote: > From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> > > The __this_cpu_read() and __this_cpu_write() functions already implement > checks for the required preemption levels when using > CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT which gives you nice error messages and such. > Therefore there is no need to explicitly check this using a BUG_ON() in > the code (which we don't do for other uses of per cpu variables either). > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> > --- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > index a39a1e1..04313a2 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c > @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned char, kvm_arm_hardware_enabled); > > static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - BUG_ON(preemptible()); > __this_cpu_write(kvm_arm_running_vcpu, vcpu); > } > > @@ -79,7 +78,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu(void) > { > - BUG_ON(preemptible()); > return __this_cpu_read(kvm_arm_running_vcpu); > } Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> M.
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c index a39a1e1..04313a2 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned char, kvm_arm_hardware_enabled); static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - BUG_ON(preemptible()); __this_cpu_write(kvm_arm_running_vcpu, vcpu); } @@ -79,7 +78,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu(void) { - BUG_ON(preemptible()); return __this_cpu_read(kvm_arm_running_vcpu); }