diff mbox

[RFC,02/19] KVM: s390: refactor crypto initialization

Message ID 1507916344-3896-3-git-send-email-akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tony Krowiak Oct. 13, 2017, 5:38 p.m. UTC
This patch introduces the following changes to crypto initialization.

* For key management operations support, the crypto control block
  (CRYCB) referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description is
  formatted only if the Message-Security-Assist (MSA) extension 3
  facility is installed (STFLE.76 is set). Virtualization of AP
  facilities, however; requires that a CRYCB of the appropriate
  format be made available to SIE regardless of the value of STFLE.76.

* The Execution Controls A (ECA) field bit 28 in the SIE block needs
  to be set to enable interpretive execution mode of adjunct processor (AP)
  instructions.

Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 +
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   17 +++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Christian Borntraeger Nov. 2, 2017, 12:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On 10/13/2017 07:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> This patch introduces the following changes to crypto initialization.
> 
> * For key management operations support, the crypto control block
>   (CRYCB) referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description is
>   formatted only if the Message-Security-Assist (MSA) extension 3
>   facility is installed (STFLE.76 is set). Virtualization of AP
>   facilities, however; requires that a CRYCB of the appropriate
>   format be made available to SIE regardless of the value of STFLE.76.
> 
> * The Execution Controls A (ECA) field bit 28 in the SIE block needs
>   to be set to enable interpretive execution mode of adjunct processor (AP)
>   instructions.

We should fence setting ECA to cases where we have virtualization capability 
for crypto. In addition we need to bind this somehow to the CPU model, so
I guess we need to add some CRYPTO feature e.g. add KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP to the
list of know features
(see arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h)
---snip---
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP       0
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIEF2      1
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_64BSCAO    2
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIIF       3
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GPERE      4
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GSLS       5
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IB         6
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI        7
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IBS        8
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY       9
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA       10
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI      11
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF     12
#define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS        13
---snip---


I will try to find out a way to properly detect that.



> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 +
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   17 +++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 50a6b25..5683f18 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>  #define ECA_MVPGI	0x01000000
>  #define ECA_VX		0x00020000
>  #define ECA_PROTEXCI	0x00002000
> +#define ECA_AP		0x00000008
>  #define ECA_SII		0x00000001
>  	__u32	eca;			/* 0x004c */
>  #define ICPT_INST	0x04
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 40d0a1a..e57fc9b 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1819,7 +1819,9 @@ static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd = (__u32)(unsigned long) kvm->arch.crypto.crycb;
> 
> -	if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
> +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> +		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd &= ~(CRYCB_FORMAT2); /* format 0 */
> +	else if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
>  		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>  	else
>  		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT1;
> @@ -1836,12 +1838,12 @@ static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
> 
>  static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> -		return;
> -
>  	kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
>  	kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
> 
> +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> +		return;
> +
>  	/* Enable AES/DEA protected key functions by default */
>  	kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw = 1;
>  	kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw = 1;
> @@ -2366,8 +2368,15 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	vcpu->arch.enabled_gmap = vcpu->arch.gmap;
>  }
> 
> +static void kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_AP;
> +}
> +
>  static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(vcpu);
> +
>  	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
>  		return;
>
Cornelia Huck Nov. 14, 2017, 11:50 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:41:18 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 10/13/2017 07:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
> > This patch introduces the following changes to crypto initialization.
> > 
> > * For key management operations support, the crypto control block
> >   (CRYCB) referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description is
> >   formatted only if the Message-Security-Assist (MSA) extension 3
> >   facility is installed (STFLE.76 is set). Virtualization of AP
> >   facilities, however; requires that a CRYCB of the appropriate
> >   format be made available to SIE regardless of the value of STFLE.76.
> > 
> > * The Execution Controls A (ECA) field bit 28 in the SIE block needs
> >   to be set to enable interpretive execution mode of adjunct processor (AP)
> >   instructions.  
> 
> We should fence setting ECA to cases where we have virtualization capability 
> for crypto. In addition we need to bind this somehow to the CPU model, so
> I guess we need to add some CRYPTO feature e.g. add KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP to the
> list of know features
> (see arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h)
> ---snip---
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP       0
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIEF2      1
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_64BSCAO    2
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIIF       3
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GPERE      4
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GSLS       5
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IB         6
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI        7
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IBS        8
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY       9
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA       10
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI      11
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF     12
> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS        13
> ---snip---

So, we need this so userspace can add the appropriate flags, right?

> 
> 
> I will try to find out a way to properly detect that.

Did you manage to find out?

> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 +
> >  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   17 +++++++++++++----
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 50a6b25..5683f18 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
> >  #define ECA_MVPGI	0x01000000
> >  #define ECA_VX		0x00020000
> >  #define ECA_PROTEXCI	0x00002000
> > +#define ECA_AP		0x00000008
> >  #define ECA_SII		0x00000001
> >  	__u32	eca;			/* 0x004c */
> >  #define ICPT_INST	0x04
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > index 40d0a1a..e57fc9b 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> > @@ -1819,7 +1819,9 @@ static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  {
> >  	kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd = (__u32)(unsigned long) kvm->arch.crypto.crycb;
> > 
> > -	if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
> > +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> > +		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd &= ~(CRYCB_FORMAT2); /* format 0 */
> > +	else if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
> >  		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT2;
> >  	else
> >  		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT1;
> > @@ -1836,12 +1838,12 @@ static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
> > 
> >  static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> >  {
> > -	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
> >  	kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
> > 
> > +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	/* Enable AES/DEA protected key functions by default */
> >  	kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw = 1;
> >  	kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw = 1;
> > @@ -2366,8 +2368,15 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  	vcpu->arch.enabled_gmap = vcpu->arch.gmap;
> >  }
> > 
> > +static void kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_AP;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> > +	kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(vcpu);
> > +
> >  	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
> >  		return;
> >   
>
Tony Krowiak Nov. 14, 2017, 3:53 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/14/2017 06:50 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 13:41:18 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/13/2017 07:38 PM, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>>> This patch introduces the following changes to crypto initialization.
>>>
>>> * For key management operations support, the crypto control block
>>>    (CRYCB) referenced by the KVM guest's SIE state description is
>>>    formatted only if the Message-Security-Assist (MSA) extension 3
>>>    facility is installed (STFLE.76 is set). Virtualization of AP
>>>    facilities, however; requires that a CRYCB of the appropriate
>>>    format be made available to SIE regardless of the value of STFLE.76.
>>>
>>> * The Execution Controls A (ECA) field bit 28 in the SIE block needs
>>>    to be set to enable interpretive execution mode of adjunct processor (AP)
>>>    instructions.
>> We should fence setting ECA to cases where we have virtualization capability
>> for crypto. In addition we need to bind this somehow to the CPU model, so
>> I guess we need to add some CRYPTO feature e.g. add KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_AP to the
>> list of know features
>> (see arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h)
>> ---snip---
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_ESOP       0
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIEF2      1
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_64BSCAO    2
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIIF       3
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GPERE      4
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_GSLS       5
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IB         6
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CEI        7
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_IBS        8
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SKEY       9
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_CMMA       10
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_PFMFI      11
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_SIGPIF     12
>> #define KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_KSS        13
>> ---snip---
> So, we need this so userspace can add the appropriate flags, right?
>
>>
>> I will try to find out a way to properly detect that.
> Did you manage to find out
The AP bus (drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c) calls 
ap_instructions_available() function in drivers/s390/crypto/ap_asm.c
to determine whether AP instructions are installed. This function 
executes the PQAP(TAPQ) function and incorporates
exception table to catch the operation exception if the AP instructions 
are not installed.  I propose externalizing
that function so it can be called from KVM.
>
>>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    1 +
>>>   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         |   17 +++++++++++++----
>>>   2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> index 50a6b25..5683f18 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>>> @@ -188,6 +188,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>>>   #define ECA_MVPGI	0x01000000
>>>   #define ECA_VX		0x00020000
>>>   #define ECA_PROTEXCI	0x00002000
>>> +#define ECA_AP		0x00000008
>>>   #define ECA_SII		0x00000001
>>>   	__u32	eca;			/* 0x004c */
>>>   #define ICPT_INST	0x04
>>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> index 40d0a1a..e57fc9b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>>> @@ -1819,7 +1819,9 @@ static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>   {
>>>   	kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd = (__u32)(unsigned long) kvm->arch.crypto.crycb;
>>>
>>> -	if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
>>> +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
>>> +		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd &= ~(CRYCB_FORMAT2); /* format 0 */
>>> +	else if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
>>>   		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT2;
>>>   	else
>>>   		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT1;
>>> @@ -1836,12 +1838,12 @@ static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
>>>
>>>   static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>   {
>>> -	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
>>> -		return;
>>> -
>>>   	kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
>>>   	kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
>>>
>>> +	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>>   	/* Enable AES/DEA protected key functions by default */
>>>   	kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw = 1;
>>>   	kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw = 1;
>>> @@ -2366,8 +2368,15 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   	vcpu->arch.enabled_gmap = vcpu->arch.gmap;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> +static void kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> +	vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_AP;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   {
>>> +	kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(vcpu);
>>> +
>>>   	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
>>>   		return;
>>>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 50a6b25..5683f18 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@  struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
 #define ECA_MVPGI	0x01000000
 #define ECA_VX		0x00020000
 #define ECA_PROTEXCI	0x00002000
+#define ECA_AP		0x00000008
 #define ECA_SII		0x00000001
 	__u32	eca;			/* 0x004c */
 #define ICPT_INST	0x04
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 40d0a1a..e57fc9b 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -1819,7 +1819,9 @@  static void kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
 	kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd = (__u32)(unsigned long) kvm->arch.crypto.crycb;
 
-	if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
+	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
+		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd &= ~(CRYCB_FORMAT2); /* format 0 */
+	else if (kvm_s390_apxa_installed())
 		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT2;
 	else
 		kvm->arch.crypto.crycbd |= CRYCB_FORMAT1;
@@ -1836,12 +1838,12 @@  static u64 kvm_s390_get_initial_cpuid(void)
 
 static void kvm_s390_crypto_init(struct kvm *kvm)
 {
-	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
-		return;
-
 	kvm->arch.crypto.crycb = &kvm->arch.sie_page2->crycb;
 	kvm_s390_set_crycb_format(kvm);
 
+	if (!test_kvm_facility(kvm, 76))
+		return;
+
 	/* Enable AES/DEA protected key functions by default */
 	kvm->arch.crypto.aes_kw = 1;
 	kvm->arch.crypto.dea_kw = 1;
@@ -2366,8 +2368,15 @@  void kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.enabled_gmap = vcpu->arch.gmap;
 }
 
+static void kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	vcpu->arch.sie_block->eca |= ECA_AP;
+}
+
 static void kvm_s390_vcpu_crypto_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
+	kvm_s390_vcpu_set_crypto_exec_mode(vcpu);
+
 	if (!test_kvm_facility(vcpu->kvm, 76))
 		return;