diff mbox

[v5,2/2] KVM: X86: Allow userspace to define the microcode version

Message ID 1519788874-16561-2-git-send-email-wanpengli@tencent.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Wanpeng Li Feb. 28, 2018, 3:34 a.m. UTC
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

Linux (among the others) has checks to make sure that certain features 
aren't enabled on a certain family/model/stepping if the microcode version 
isn't greater than or equal to a known good version.

By exposing the real microcode version, we're preventing buggy guests that
don't check that they are running virtualized (i.e., they should trust the
hypervisor) from disabling features that are effectively not buggy.

Suggested-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
v4 -> v5:
 * microcode_version be u64 and initialized suitable, remote hte shifts
v3 -> v4:
 * add the shifts back
v2 -> v3:
 * remove the shifts
 * add the MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV version to the "feature MSRs"
v1 -> v2:
 * add MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV to emulated_msrs

 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              |  4 +---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |  1 +
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 10 ++++++++--
 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Tom Lendacky Feb. 28, 2018, 5:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2/27/2018 9:34 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> 
> Linux (among the others) has checks to make sure that certain features 
> aren't enabled on a certain family/model/stepping if the microcode version 
> isn't greater than or equal to a known good version.
> 
> By exposing the real microcode version, we're preventing buggy guests that
> don't check that they are running virtualized (i.e., they should trust the
> hypervisor) from disabling features that are effectively not buggy.
> 
> Suggested-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
> v4 -> v5:
>  * microcode_version be u64 and initialized suitable, remote hte shifts
> v3 -> v4:
>  * add the shifts back
> v2 -> v3:
>  * remove the shifts
>  * add the MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV version to the "feature MSRs"

I think you lost this part from the patch series.  I don't see where you
add MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV to the msr_based_features array.

Thanks,
Tom

> v1 -> v2:
>  * add MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV to emulated_msrs
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              |  4 +---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c              |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 10 ++++++++--
>  4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 938d453..df6720f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	u64 smi_count;
>  	bool tpr_access_reporting;
>  	u64 ia32_xss;
> +	u64 microcode_version;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Paging state of the vcpu
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f874798..312f33f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  	u32 dummy;
>  	u32 eax = 1;
>  
> +	vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x01000065;
>  	svm->spec_ctrl = 0;
>  
>  	if (!init_event) {
> @@ -3962,9 +3963,6 @@ static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  
>  		msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
>  		break;
> -	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> -		msr_info->data = 0x01000065;
> -		break;
>  	case MSR_F15H_IC_CFG: {
>  
>  		int family, model;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 9968906..2cdbea7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -5781,6 +5781,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  	vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0;
>  	vmx->spec_ctrl = 0;
>  
> +	vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x100000000ULL;
>  	vmx->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = get_rdx_init_val();
>  	kvm_set_cr8(vcpu, 0);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index efc8554..52a09df 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -1065,6 +1065,9 @@ static unsigned int num_msr_based_features;
>  static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
>  {
>  	switch (msr->index) {
> +	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> +		rdmsrl(msr->index, msr->data);
> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		if (kvm_x86_ops->get_msr_feature(msr))
>  			return 1;
> @@ -2260,7 +2263,6 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  
>  	switch (msr) {
>  	case MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG:
> -	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
>  	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE:
>  	case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
>  	case MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER:
> @@ -2268,6 +2270,10 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  	case MSR_AMD64_DC_CFG:
>  		break;
>  
> +	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> +		if (msr_info->host_initiated)
> +			vcpu->arch.microcode_version = data;
> +		break;
>  	case MSR_EFER:
>  		return set_efer(vcpu, data);
>  	case MSR_K7_HWCR:
> @@ -2563,7 +2569,7 @@ int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>  		msr_info->data = 0;
>  		break;
>  	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
> -		msr_info->data = 0x100000000ULL;
> +		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.microcode_version;
>  		break;
>  	case MSR_MTRRcap:
>  	case 0x200 ... 0x2ff:
>
Wanpeng Li Feb. 28, 2018, 5:59 a.m. UTC | #2
2018-02-28 13:55 GMT+08:00 Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>:
> On 2/27/2018 9:34 PM, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>>
>> Linux (among the others) has checks to make sure that certain features
>> aren't enabled on a certain family/model/stepping if the microcode version
>> isn't greater than or equal to a known good version.
>>
>> By exposing the real microcode version, we're preventing buggy guests that
>> don't check that they are running virtualized (i.e., they should trust the
>> hypervisor) from disabling features that are effectively not buggy.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Filippo Sironi <sironi@amazon.de>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
>> ---
>> v4 -> v5:
>>  * microcode_version be u64 and initialized suitable, remote hte shifts
>> v3 -> v4:
>>  * add the shifts back
>> v2 -> v3:
>>  * remove the shifts
>>  * add the MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV version to the "feature MSRs"
>
> I think you lost this part from the patch series.  I don't see where you
> add MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV to the msr_based_features array.

I sent out a wrong version, will send again.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 938d453..df6720f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -507,6 +507,7 @@  struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	u64 smi_count;
 	bool tpr_access_reporting;
 	u64 ia32_xss;
+	u64 microcode_version;
 
 	/*
 	 * Paging state of the vcpu
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index f874798..312f33f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1907,6 +1907,7 @@  static void svm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
 	u32 dummy;
 	u32 eax = 1;
 
+	vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x01000065;
 	svm->spec_ctrl = 0;
 
 	if (!init_event) {
@@ -3962,9 +3963,6 @@  static int svm_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 
 		msr_info->data = svm->spec_ctrl;
 		break;
-	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
-		msr_info->data = 0x01000065;
-		break;
 	case MSR_F15H_IC_CFG: {
 
 		int family, model;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 9968906..2cdbea7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -5781,6 +5781,7 @@  static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
 	vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0;
 	vmx->spec_ctrl = 0;
 
+	vcpu->arch.microcode_version = 0x100000000ULL;
 	vmx->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = get_rdx_init_val();
 	kvm_set_cr8(vcpu, 0);
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index efc8554..52a09df 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1065,6 +1065,9 @@  static unsigned int num_msr_based_features;
 static int kvm_get_msr_feature(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
 {
 	switch (msr->index) {
+	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
+		rdmsrl(msr->index, msr->data);
+		break;
 	default:
 		if (kvm_x86_ops->get_msr_feature(msr))
 			return 1;
@@ -2260,7 +2263,6 @@  int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 
 	switch (msr) {
 	case MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG:
-	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
 	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE:
 	case MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA:
 	case MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER:
@@ -2268,6 +2270,10 @@  int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 	case MSR_AMD64_DC_CFG:
 		break;
 
+	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
+		if (msr_info->host_initiated)
+			vcpu->arch.microcode_version = data;
+		break;
 	case MSR_EFER:
 		return set_efer(vcpu, data);
 	case MSR_K7_HWCR:
@@ -2563,7 +2569,7 @@  int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 		msr_info->data = 0;
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
-		msr_info->data = 0x100000000ULL;
+		msr_info->data = vcpu->arch.microcode_version;
 		break;
 	case MSR_MTRRcap:
 	case 0x200 ... 0x2ff: