Message ID | 1591877734-66527-14-git-send-email-yi.l.liu@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c index 90c0b80..4b9af99 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static const u16 pci_ext_cap_length[PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX + 1] = { [PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_LTR] = PCI_EXT_CAP_LTR_SIZEOF, [PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_SECPCI] = 0, /* not yet */ [PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PMUX] = 0, /* not yet */ - [PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PASID] = 0, /* not yet */ + [PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PASID] = PCI_EXT_CAP_PASID_SIZEOF, }; /*
This patch exposes PCIe PASID capability to guest for assigned devices. Existing vfio_pci driver hides it from guest by setting the capability length as 0 in pci_ext_cap_length[]. And this patch only exposes PASID capability for devices which has PCIe PASID extended struture in its configuration space. So VFs, will will not see PASID capability on VFs as VF doesn't implement PASID extended structure in its configuration space. For VF, it is a TODO in future. Related discussion can be found in below link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/4/7/693 Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com> CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> --- v1 -> v2: *) added in v2, but it was sent in a separate patchseries before drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)