diff mbox series

[v3,01/11] KVM: SVM: Introduce __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept

Message ID 159597947370.12744.8741858978174141331.stgit@bmoger-ubuntu (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series SVM cleanup and INVPCID support for the AMD guests | expand

Commit Message

Babu Moger July 28, 2020, 11:37 p.m. UTC
This is in preparation for the future intercept vector additions.

Add new functions __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept
using kernel APIs __set_bit, __clear_bit and test_bit espectively.

Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

Comments

Jim Mattson July 28, 2020, 11:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 4:37 PM Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> wrote:
>
> This is in preparation for the future intercept vector additions.
>
> Add new functions __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept
> using kernel APIs __set_bit, __clear_bit and test_bit espectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
Sean will probably complain about introducing unused functions, but...

Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Paolo Bonzini July 29, 2020, 11:09 p.m. UTC | #2
On 29/07/20 01:37, Babu Moger wrote:
> This is in preparation for the future intercept vector additions.
> 
> Add new functions __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept
> using kernel APIs __set_bit, __clear_bit and test_bit espectively.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index 6ac4c00a5d82..3b669718190a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -217,6 +217,21 @@ static inline struct vmcb *get_host_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>  		return svm->vmcb;
>  }
>  
> +static inline void __set_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
> +{
> +	__set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __clr_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
> +{
> +	__clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool __is_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
> +{
> +	return test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
> +}
> +

Probably worth adding a range check?

Paolo

>  static inline void set_cr_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit)
>  {
>  	struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm);
>
Babu Moger July 30, 2020, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #3
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf
> Of Paolo Bonzini
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 6:09 PM
> To: Moger, Babu <Babu.Moger@amd.com>; vkuznets@redhat.com;
> wanpengli@tencent.com; sean.j.christopherson@intel.com;
> jmattson@google.com
> Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org; x86@kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; mingo@redhat.com; bp@alien8.de; hpa@zytor.com;
> tglx@linutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] KVM: SVM: Introduce __set_intercept,
> __clr_intercept and __is_intercept
> 
> On 29/07/20 01:37, Babu Moger wrote:
> > This is in preparation for the future intercept vector additions.
> >
> > Add new functions __set_intercept, __clr_intercept and __is_intercept
> > using kernel APIs __set_bit, __clear_bit and test_bit espectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |   15 +++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h index
> > 6ac4c00a5d82..3b669718190a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> > @@ -217,6 +217,21 @@ static inline struct vmcb *get_host_vmcb(struct
> vcpu_svm *svm)
> >  		return svm->vmcb;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline void __set_intercept(void *addr, int bit) {
> > +	__set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr); }
> > +
> > +static inline void __clr_intercept(void *addr, int bit) {
> > +	__clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr); }
> > +
> > +static inline bool __is_intercept(void *addr, int bit) {
> > +	return test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr); }
> > +
> 
> Probably worth adding a range check?

Paolo,
Not sure. It is only called with intercept bits like __set_intercept(addr,
INTERCEPT_ xx). All these intercept bits are already accounted for.
Thanks


> 
> >  static inline void set_cr_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit)  {
> >  	struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm);
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 6ac4c00a5d82..3b669718190a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -217,6 +217,21 @@  static inline struct vmcb *get_host_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 		return svm->vmcb;
 }
 
+static inline void __set_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
+{
+	__set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
+}
+
+static inline void __clr_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
+{
+	__clear_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
+}
+
+static inline bool __is_intercept(void *addr, int bit)
+{
+	return test_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)addr);
+}
+
 static inline void set_cr_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm, int bit)
 {
 	struct vmcb *vmcb = get_host_vmcb(svm);