diff mbox series

[v2] vfio/type1: Use follow_pte()

Message ID 161351571186.15573.5602248562129684350.stgit@gimli.home (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] vfio/type1: Use follow_pte() | expand

Commit Message

Alex Williamson Feb. 16, 2021, 10:49 p.m. UTC
follow_pfn() doesn't make sure that we're using the correct page
protections, get the pte with follow_pte() so that we can test
protections and get the pfn from the pte.

Fixes: 5cbf3264bc71 ("vfio/type1: Fix VA->PA translation for PFNMAP VMAs in vaddr_get_pfn()")
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---

v2: Update to current follow_pte() API, add Reviews

 drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Peter Xu Feb. 16, 2021, 11:43 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:49:34PM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> follow_pfn() doesn't make sure that we're using the correct page
> protections, get the pte with follow_pte() so that we can test
> protections and get the pfn from the pte.
> 
> Fixes: 5cbf3264bc71 ("vfio/type1: Fix VA->PA translation for PFNMAP VMAs in vaddr_get_pfn()")
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Alex Williamson Feb. 22, 2021, 6:39 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:49:34 -0700
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:

> follow_pfn() doesn't make sure that we're using the correct page
> protections, get the pte with follow_pte() so that we can test
> protections and get the pfn from the pte.
> 
> Fixes: 5cbf3264bc71 ("vfio/type1: Fix VA->PA translation for PFNMAP VMAs in vaddr_get_pfn()")
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
> 
> v2: Update to current follow_pte() API, add Reviews
> 
>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index ec9fd95a138b..ae4fd2295c95 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -463,9 +463,11 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			    unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long *pfn,
>  			    bool write_fault)
>  {
> +	pte_t *ptep;
> +	spinlock_t *ptl;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
> +	ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &ptep, &ptl);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		bool unlocked = false;
>  
> @@ -479,9 +481,17 @@ static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  
> -		ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
> +		ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &ptep, &ptl);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (write_fault && !pte_write(*ptep))
> +		ret = -EFAULT;
> +	else
> +		*pfn = pte_pfn(*ptep);
> +
> +	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> 

Adding the following to resolve 32-bit build:

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 8a777250764a..ed03f3fcb07e 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/compat.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/fs.h>
+#include <linux/highmem.h>
 #include <linux/iommu.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index ec9fd95a138b..ae4fd2295c95 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -463,9 +463,11 @@  static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			    unsigned long vaddr, unsigned long *pfn,
 			    bool write_fault)
 {
+	pte_t *ptep;
+	spinlock_t *ptl;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
+	ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &ptep, &ptl);
 	if (ret) {
 		bool unlocked = false;
 
@@ -479,9 +481,17 @@  static int follow_fault_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm,
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
 
-		ret = follow_pfn(vma, vaddr, pfn);
+		ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, vaddr, &ptep, &ptl);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (write_fault && !pte_write(*ptep))
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+	else
+		*pfn = pte_pfn(*ptep);
+
+	pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
 	return ret;
 }