From patchwork Thu Aug 24 18:51:23 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Hildenbrand X-Patchwork-Id: 9920691 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9126A60349 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8710C289CD for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 79FDA289F2; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D054289B8 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753749AbdHXSvo (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:51:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53294 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753728AbdHXSvm (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 14:51:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A0D9C0467CF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7A0D9C0467CF Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com Received: from t460s.redhat.com (ovpn-116-68.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646B06E73B; Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:41 +0000 (UTC) From: David Hildenbrand To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= , david@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH v2 01/15] KVM: x86: mmu: returning void in a void function is strange Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 20:51:23 +0200 Message-Id: <20170824185137.6253-2-david@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170824185137.6253-1-david@redhat.com> References: <20170824185137.6253-1-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Thu, 24 Aug 2017 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Let's just drop the return. Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index 2dafd36368cc..e29ab2e762bb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -2422,7 +2422,7 @@ static void __shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator, static void shadow_walk_next(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator) { - return __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep); + __shadow_walk_next(iterator, *iterator->sptep); } static void link_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,