diff mbox

KVM: x86: Fix device passthrough when SME is active

Message ID 20180308231731.27881.84826.stgit@tlendack-t1.amdoffice.net (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tom Lendacky March 8, 2018, 11:17 p.m. UTC
When using device passthrough with SME active, the MMIO range that is
mapped for the device should not be mapped encrypted.  Add a check in
set_spte() to insure that a page is not mapped encrypted if that page
is a device MMIO page as indicated by kvm_is_mmio_pfn().

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x-
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Tom Lendacky March 16, 2018, 4:03 a.m. UTC | #1
On 3/8/2018 5:17 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> When using device passthrough with SME active, the MMIO range that is
> mapped for the device should not be mapped encrypted.  Add a check in
> set_spte() to insure that a page is not mapped encrypted if that page
> is a device MMIO page as indicated by kvm_is_mmio_pfn().
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x-
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Any concerns with this fix?

Thanks,
Tom

> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index f551962..763bb3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2770,8 +2770,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>  	else
>  		pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>  
> +	if (!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
> +		spte |= shadow_me_mask;
> +
>  	spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	spte |= shadow_me_mask;
>  
>  	if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
>  
>
Paolo Bonzini March 16, 2018, 12:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On 09/03/2018 00:17, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> When using device passthrough with SME active, the MMIO range that is
> mapped for the device should not be mapped encrypted.  Add a check in
> set_spte() to insure that a page is not mapped encrypted if that page
> is a device MMIO page as indicated by kvm_is_mmio_pfn().
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14.x-
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index f551962..763bb3b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2770,8 +2770,10 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>  	else
>  		pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
>  
> +	if (!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
> +		spte |= shadow_me_mask;
> +
>  	spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> -	spte |= shadow_me_mask;
>  
>  	if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
>  
> 

No, I'm applying it.

Paolo
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index f551962..763bb3b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -2770,8 +2770,10 @@  static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
 	else
 		pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
 
+	if (!kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn))
+		spte |= shadow_me_mask;
+
 	spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
-	spte |= shadow_me_mask;
 
 	if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {