From patchwork Thu May 16 16:14:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Eric Farman X-Patchwork-Id: 10946881 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B6C1708 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA72898B for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 9CF2528A74; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6DF289AF for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726551AbfEPQON (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 12:14:13 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:47136 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726464AbfEPQOM (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2019 12:14:12 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4GGCVwx012916 for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:14:11 -0400 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sha8bb0tn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 16 May 2019 12:14:10 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 16 May 2019 17:14:09 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 16 May 2019 17:14:07 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x4GGE68U43909330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:06 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36494C09A; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2874C094; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 16 May 2019 16:14:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (Postfix, from userid 4958) id 81DC5E091C; Thu, 16 May 2019 18:14:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Farman To: Cornelia Huck , Farhan Ali Cc: Halil Pasic , Pierre Morel , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Eric Farman Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] s390/cio: Remove vfio-ccw checks of command codes Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 18:14:03 +0200 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190516161403.79053-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190516161403.79053-1-farman@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19051616-0012-0000-0000-0000031C67E9 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19051616-0013-0000-0000-000021550A2A Message-Id: <20190516161403.79053-4-farman@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-16_14:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905160103 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP If the CCW being processed is a No-Operation, then by definition no data is being transferred. Let's fold those checks into the normal CCW processors, rather than skipping out early. Likewise, if the CCW being processed is a "test" (a category defined here as an opcode that contains zero in the lowest four bits) then no special processing is necessary as far as vfio-ccw is concerned. These command codes have not been valid since the S/370 days, meaning they are invalid in the same way as one that ends in an eight [1] or an otherwise valid command code that is undefined for the device type in question. Considering that, let's just process "test" CCWs like any other CCW, and send everything to the hardware. [1] POPS states that a x08 is a TIC CCW, and that having any high-order bits enabled is invalid for format-1 CCWs. For format-0 CCWs, the high-order bits are ignored. Signed-off-by: Eric Farman --- drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c index c77c9b4cd2a8..f73cfcfdd032 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_cp.c @@ -295,8 +295,6 @@ static long copy_ccw_from_iova(struct channel_program *cp, #define ccw_is_read_backward(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == 0x0C) #define ccw_is_sense(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == CCW_CMD_BASIC_SENSE) -#define ccw_is_test(_ccw) (((_ccw)->cmd_code & 0x0F) == 0) - #define ccw_is_noop(_ccw) ((_ccw)->cmd_code == CCW_CMD_NOOP) #define ccw_is_tic(_ccw) ((_ccw)->cmd_code == CCW_CMD_TIC) @@ -320,6 +318,10 @@ static inline int ccw_does_data_transfer(struct ccw1 *ccw) if (ccw->count == 0) return 0; + /* If the command is a NOP, then no data will be transferred */ + if (ccw_is_noop(ccw)) + return 0; + /* If the skip flag is off, then data will be transferred */ if (!ccw_is_skip(ccw)) return 1; @@ -404,7 +406,7 @@ static void ccwchain_cda_free(struct ccwchain *chain, int idx) { struct ccw1 *ccw = chain->ch_ccw + idx; - if (ccw_is_test(ccw) || ccw_is_noop(ccw) || ccw_is_tic(ccw)) + if (ccw_is_tic(ccw)) return; kfree((void *)(u64)ccw->cda); @@ -730,9 +732,6 @@ static int ccwchain_fetch_one(struct ccwchain *chain, { struct ccw1 *ccw = chain->ch_ccw + idx; - if (ccw_is_test(ccw) || ccw_is_noop(ccw)) - return 0; - if (ccw_is_tic(ccw)) return ccwchain_fetch_tic(chain, idx, cp);