Message ID | 20190526161004.25232-24-eric.auger@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup | expand |
Hi Eric, > From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 12:10 AM > Subject: [PATCH v8 23/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE > > From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> > > When the guest "owns" the stage 1 translation structures, the host IOMMU driver > has no knowledge of caching structure updates unless the guest invalidation > requests are trapped and passed down to the host. > > This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE ioctl with aims at > propagating guest stage1 IOMMU cache invalidations to the host. > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> > > --- > v6 -> v7: > - Use iommu_capsule struct > - renamed vfio_iommu_for_each_dev into vfio_iommu_lookup_dev > due to checkpatch error related to for_each_dev suffix > > v2 -> v3: > - introduce vfio_iommu_for_each_dev back in this patch > > v1 -> v2: > - s/TLB/CACHE > - remove vfio_iommu_task usage > - commit message rewording > --- > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 13 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > index b2d609d6fe83..6fda4fbc9bfa 100644 > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c > @@ -120,6 +120,34 @@ struct vfio_regions { > #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \ > (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) > > +struct domain_capsule { > + struct iommu_domain *domain; > + void *data; > +}; > + > +/* iommu->lock must be held */ > +static int > +vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, > + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data), > + void *data) > +{ > + struct domain_capsule dc = {.data = data}; > + struct vfio_domain *d; > + struct vfio_group *g; > + int ret = 0; > + > + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) { > + dc.domain = d->domain; > + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) { > + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(g->iommu_group, > + &dc, fn); > + if (ret) > + break; > + } > + } > + return ret; > +} > + > static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot); > > /* > @@ -1795,6 +1823,15 @@ vfio_attach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, > return ret; > } > > +static int vfio_cache_inv_fn(struct device *dev, void *data) { > + struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data; > + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *ustruct = > + (struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *)dc->data; > + > + return iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, &ustruct->info); } > + > static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, > unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { @@ - > 1881,6 +1918,24 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, > } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE) { > vfio_detach_pasid_table(iommu); > return 0; > + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE) { > + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate ustruct; > + int ret; > + > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate, > + info); > + > + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) > + return -EFAULT; > + > + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags) May remove the flags field? > + return -EINVAL; > + > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock); > + ret = vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(iommu, vfio_cache_inv_fn, > + &ustruct); > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock); > + return ret; > } > > return -ENOTTY; > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h index > 4316dd8cb5b5..055aa9b9745a 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h > @@ -785,6 +785,19 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_attach_pasid_table { > */ > #define VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23) > > +/** > + * VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24, > + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate) > + * > + * Propagate guest IOMMU cache invalidation to the host. > + */ > +struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate { > + __u32 argsz; > + __u32 flags; Looks like there is no more usage on "flags". is it? Regards, Yi Liu > + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info info; }; > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24) > + > /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */ > > /* > -- > 2.20.1
Hi Liu, On 6/14/19 2:38 PM, Liu, Yi L wrote: > Hi Eric, > >> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com] >> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2019 12:10 AM >> Subject: [PATCH v8 23/29] vfio: VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE >> >> From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> >> >> When the guest "owns" the stage 1 translation structures, the host IOMMU driver >> has no knowledge of caching structure updates unless the guest invalidation >> requests are trapped and passed down to the host. >> >> This patch adds the VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE ioctl with aims at >> propagating guest stage1 IOMMU cache invalidations to the host. >> >> Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> >> >> --- >> v6 -> v7: >> - Use iommu_capsule struct >> - renamed vfio_iommu_for_each_dev into vfio_iommu_lookup_dev >> due to checkpatch error related to for_each_dev suffix >> >> v2 -> v3: >> - introduce vfio_iommu_for_each_dev back in this patch >> >> v1 -> v2: >> - s/TLB/CACHE >> - remove vfio_iommu_task usage >> - commit message rewording >> --- >> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 13 ++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c >> index b2d609d6fe83..6fda4fbc9bfa 100644 >> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c >> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c >> @@ -120,6 +120,34 @@ struct vfio_regions { >> #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \ >> (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) >> >> +struct domain_capsule { >> + struct iommu_domain *domain; >> + void *data; >> +}; >> + >> +/* iommu->lock must be held */ >> +static int >> +vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, >> + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data), >> + void *data) >> +{ >> + struct domain_capsule dc = {.data = data}; >> + struct vfio_domain *d; >> + struct vfio_group *g; >> + int ret = 0; >> + >> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) { >> + dc.domain = d->domain; >> + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) { >> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(g->iommu_group, >> + &dc, fn); >> + if (ret) >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot); >> >> /* >> @@ -1795,6 +1823,15 @@ vfio_attach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, >> return ret; >> } >> >> +static int vfio_cache_inv_fn(struct device *dev, void *data) { >> + struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data; >> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *ustruct = >> + (struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *)dc->data; >> + >> + return iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, &ustruct->info); } >> + >> static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, >> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { @@ - >> 1881,6 +1918,24 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, >> } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE) { >> vfio_detach_pasid_table(iommu); >> return 0; >> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE) { >> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate ustruct; >> + int ret; >> + >> + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate, >> + info); >> + >> + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) >> + return -EFAULT; >> + >> + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags) > > May remove the flags field? > >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock); >> + ret = vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(iommu, vfio_cache_inv_fn, >> + &ustruct); >> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock); >> + return ret; >> } >> >> return -ENOTTY; >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h index >> 4316dd8cb5b5..055aa9b9745a 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h >> @@ -785,6 +785,19 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_attach_pasid_table { >> */ >> #define VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23) >> >> +/** >> + * VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24, >> + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate) >> + * >> + * Propagate guest IOMMU cache invalidation to the host. >> + */ >> +struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate { >> + __u32 argsz; >> + __u32 flags; > > Looks like there is no more usage on "flags". is it? Agreed. However all the other vfio structs embed it. vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap (VFIO_IOMMU_UNMAP_DMA) or vfio_iommu_type1_info (VFIO_IOMMU_GET_INFO) also feature it and do not use it either if I am not wrong. So I guess flags is a common pattern for the API and somehow allows to extend the API if needed. So I would be inclined to keep it, no? Thanks Eric > > Regards, > Yi Liu > >> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info info; }; >> +#define VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24) >> + >> /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */ >> >> /* >> -- >> 2.20.1 >
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index b2d609d6fe83..6fda4fbc9bfa 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c @@ -120,6 +120,34 @@ struct vfio_regions { #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \ (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list)) +struct domain_capsule { + struct iommu_domain *domain; + void *data; +}; + +/* iommu->lock must be held */ +static int +vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, + int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data), + void *data) +{ + struct domain_capsule dc = {.data = data}; + struct vfio_domain *d; + struct vfio_group *g; + int ret = 0; + + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) { + dc.domain = d->domain; + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) { + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(g->iommu_group, + &dc, fn); + if (ret) + break; + } + } + return ret; +} + static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot); /* @@ -1795,6 +1823,15 @@ vfio_attach_pasid_table(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, return ret; } +static int vfio_cache_inv_fn(struct device *dev, void *data) +{ + struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data; + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *ustruct = + (struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate *)dc->data; + + return iommu_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, &ustruct->info); +} + static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) { @@ -1881,6 +1918,24 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data, } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE) { vfio_detach_pasid_table(iommu); return 0; + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE) { + struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate ustruct; + int ret; + + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate, + info); + + if (copy_from_user(&ustruct, (void __user *)arg, minsz)) + return -EFAULT; + + if (ustruct.argsz < minsz || ustruct.flags) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock); + ret = vfio_iommu_lookup_dev(iommu, vfio_cache_inv_fn, + &ustruct); + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock); + return ret; } return -ENOTTY; diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h index 4316dd8cb5b5..055aa9b9745a 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h @@ -785,6 +785,19 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_attach_pasid_table { */ #define VFIO_IOMMU_DETACH_PASID_TABLE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 23) +/** + * VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE - _IOWR(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24, + * struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate) + * + * Propagate guest IOMMU cache invalidation to the host. + */ +struct vfio_iommu_type1_cache_invalidate { + __u32 argsz; + __u32 flags; + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info info; +}; +#define VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 24) + /* -------- Additional API for SPAPR TCE (Server POWERPC) IOMMU -------- */ /*