Message ID | 20191122200450.26239-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: x86: Open code shared_msr_update() in its only caller | expand |
On 22/11/19 21:04, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Fold shared_msr_update() into its sole user to eliminate its pointless > bounds check, its godawful printk, its misleading comment (it's called > under a global lock), and its woefully inaccurate name. > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 29 +++++++++-------------------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > index a256e09f321a..35b571c769bd 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c > @@ -262,23 +262,6 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn) > } > } > > -static void shared_msr_update(unsigned slot, u32 msr) > -{ > - u64 value; > - unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > - struct kvm_shared_msrs *smsr = per_cpu_ptr(shared_msrs, cpu); > - > - /* only read, and nobody should modify it at this time, > - * so don't need lock */ > - if (slot >= shared_msrs_global.nr) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: invalid MSR slot!"); > - return; > - } > - rdmsrl_safe(msr, &value); > - smsr->values[slot].host = value; > - smsr->values[slot].curr = value; > -} > - > void kvm_define_shared_msr(unsigned slot, u32 msr) > { > BUG_ON(slot >= KVM_NR_SHARED_MSRS); > @@ -290,10 +273,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_define_shared_msr); > > static void kvm_shared_msr_cpu_online(void) > { > - unsigned i; > + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); > + struct kvm_shared_msrs *smsr = per_cpu_ptr(shared_msrs, cpu); > + u64 value; > + int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < shared_msrs_global.nr; ++i) > - shared_msr_update(i, shared_msrs_global.msrs[i]); > + for (i = 0; i < shared_msrs_global.nr; ++i) { > + rdmsrl_safe(shared_msrs_global.msrs[i], &value); > + smsr->values[i].host = value; > + smsr->values[i].curr = value; > + } > } > > int kvm_set_shared_msr(unsigned slot, u64 value, u64 mask) > Queued, thanks. Paolo
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index a256e09f321a..35b571c769bd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -262,23 +262,6 @@ static void kvm_on_user_return(struct user_return_notifier *urn) } } -static void shared_msr_update(unsigned slot, u32 msr) -{ - u64 value; - unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); - struct kvm_shared_msrs *smsr = per_cpu_ptr(shared_msrs, cpu); - - /* only read, and nobody should modify it at this time, - * so don't need lock */ - if (slot >= shared_msrs_global.nr) { - printk(KERN_ERR "kvm: invalid MSR slot!"); - return; - } - rdmsrl_safe(msr, &value); - smsr->values[slot].host = value; - smsr->values[slot].curr = value; -} - void kvm_define_shared_msr(unsigned slot, u32 msr) { BUG_ON(slot >= KVM_NR_SHARED_MSRS); @@ -290,10 +273,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_define_shared_msr); static void kvm_shared_msr_cpu_online(void) { - unsigned i; + unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); + struct kvm_shared_msrs *smsr = per_cpu_ptr(shared_msrs, cpu); + u64 value; + int i; - for (i = 0; i < shared_msrs_global.nr; ++i) - shared_msr_update(i, shared_msrs_global.msrs[i]); + for (i = 0; i < shared_msrs_global.nr; ++i) { + rdmsrl_safe(shared_msrs_global.msrs[i], &value); + smsr->values[i].host = value; + smsr->values[i].curr = value; + } } int kvm_set_shared_msr(unsigned slot, u64 value, u64 mask)
Fold shared_msr_update() into its sole user to eliminate its pointless bounds check, its godawful printk, its misleading comment (it's called under a global lock), and its woefully inaccurate name. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 29 +++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)