diff mbox series

[v3,kvmtool,12/32] vfio/pci: Ignore expansion ROM BAR writes

Message ID 20200326152438.6218-13-alexandru.elisei@arm.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Add reassignable BARs and PCIE 1.1 support | expand

Commit Message

Alexandru Elisei March 26, 2020, 3:24 p.m. UTC
To get the size of the expansion ROM, software writes 0xfffff800 to the
expansion ROM BAR in the PCI configuration space. PCI emulation executes
the optional configuration space write callback that a device can implement
before emulating this write.

kvmtool's implementation of VFIO doesn't have support for emulating
expansion ROMs. However, the callback writes the guest value to the
hardware BAR, and then it reads it back to the emulated BAR to make sure
the write has completed successfully.

After this, we return to regular PCI emulation and because the BAR is no
longer 0, we write back to the BAR the value that the guest used to get the
size. As a result, the guest will think that the ROM size is 0x800 after
the subsequent read and we end up unintentionally exposing to the guest a
BAR which we don't emulate.

Let's fix this by ignoring writes to the expansion ROM BAR.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
---
 vfio/pci.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Comments

Andre Przywara March 30, 2020, 9:29 a.m. UTC | #1
On 26/03/2020 15:24, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> To get the size of the expansion ROM, software writes 0xfffff800 to the
> expansion ROM BAR in the PCI configuration space. PCI emulation executes
> the optional configuration space write callback that a device can implement
> before emulating this write.
> 
> kvmtool's implementation of VFIO doesn't have support for emulating
> expansion ROMs. However, the callback writes the guest value to the
> hardware BAR, and then it reads it back to the emulated BAR to make sure
> the write has completed successfully.
> 
> After this, we return to regular PCI emulation and because the BAR is no
> longer 0, we write back to the BAR the value that the guest used to get the
> size. As a result, the guest will think that the ROM size is 0x800 after
> the subsequent read and we end up unintentionally exposing to the guest a
> BAR which we don't emulate.
> 
> Let's fix this by ignoring writes to the expansion ROM BAR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>

Thanks,
Andre

> ---
>  vfio/pci.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/vfio/pci.c b/vfio/pci.c
> index 1bdc20038411..1f38f90c3ae9 100644
> --- a/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -472,6 +472,9 @@ static void vfio_pci_cfg_write(struct kvm *kvm, struct pci_device_header *pci_hd
>  	struct vfio_device *vdev;
>  	void *base = pci_hdr;
>  
> +	if (offset == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS)
> +		return;
> +
>  	pdev = container_of(pci_hdr, struct vfio_pci_device, hdr);
>  	vdev = container_of(pdev, struct vfio_device, pci);
>  	info = &vdev->regions[VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX].info;
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/vfio/pci.c b/vfio/pci.c
index 1bdc20038411..1f38f90c3ae9 100644
--- a/vfio/pci.c
+++ b/vfio/pci.c
@@ -472,6 +472,9 @@  static void vfio_pci_cfg_write(struct kvm *kvm, struct pci_device_header *pci_hd
 	struct vfio_device *vdev;
 	void *base = pci_hdr;
 
+	if (offset == PCI_ROM_ADDRESS)
+		return;
+
 	pdev = container_of(pci_hdr, struct vfio_pci_device, hdr);
 	vdev = container_of(pdev, struct vfio_device, pci);
 	info = &vdev->regions[VFIO_PCI_CONFIG_REGION_INDEX].info;