From patchwork Tue Apr 14 15:06:04 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Eric Auger X-Patchwork-Id: 11488171 Return-Path: Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1A2913 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456AF2078B for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="APyb7RCU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2440235AbgDNPIC (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:08:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:59262 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2440228AbgDNPH7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:07:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1586876878; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lr2hx0ovKzPSgkmlzTqsTyKLkb7WnJkFJ806uC26PBw=; b=APyb7RCUWPJdtmWi91nak15tOZUiO1aeVLV0DO52/+n+XzyDzqZ+3IaAySAeWE6dScP8RC volbI5B8sW314AxckHZjPjZqWXvv1HfAekEo3+8+aDa8lIKgxCNGLZYRDQol48o4Dn9F8M BEMUa8ojq1KhcW7ogXOgG/ckMrCKrhk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-87-S082tG5SNXeKg2DlYw57vw-1; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:07:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: S082tG5SNXeKg2DlYw57vw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12091005509; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop.redhat.com (ovpn-115-53.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B15719C69; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:07:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Eric Auger To: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, will@kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, maz@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com Cc: jean-philippe@linaro.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, zhangfei.gao@gmail.com, tn@semihalf.com, zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com, bbhushan2@marvell.com Subject: [PATCH v11 10/13] iommu/smmuv3: Nested mode single MSI doorbell per domain enforcement Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:06:04 +0200 Message-Id: <20200414150607.28488-11-eric.auger@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20200414150607.28488-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> References: <20200414150607.28488-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org In nested mode we enforce the rule that all devices belonging to the same iommu_domain share the same msi_domain. Indeed if there were several physical MSI doorbells being used within a single iommu_domain, it becomes really difficult to resolve the nested stage mapping translating into the correct physical doorbell. So let's forbid this situation. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger --- drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c index 38854c3e4083..f157d1de614b 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c @@ -2896,6 +2896,37 @@ static void arm_smmu_detach_dev(struct arm_smmu_master *master) arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(master); } +static bool arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain, + struct device *dev) +{ + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain); + struct irq_domain *irqd = dev_get_msi_domain(dev); + struct arm_smmu_master *master; + unsigned long flags; + bool share = false; + + if (!irqd) + return true; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); + list_for_each_entry(master, &smmu_domain->devices, domain_head) { + struct irq_domain *d = dev_get_msi_domain(master->dev); + + if (!d) + continue; + if (irqd != d) { + dev_info(dev, "Nested mode forbids to attach devices " + "using different physical MSI doorbells " + "to the same iommu_domain"); + goto unlock; + } + } + share = true; +unlock: + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu_domain->devices_lock, flags); + return share; +} + static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) { int ret = 0; @@ -2937,6 +2968,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev) ret = -EINVAL; goto out_unlock; } + /* + * In nested mode we must check all devices belonging to the + * domain share the same physical MSI doorbell. Otherwise nested + * stage MSI binding is not supported. + */ + if (smmu_domain->stage == ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED && + !arm_smmu_share_msi_domain(domain, dev)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out_unlock; + } master->domain = smmu_domain;