diff mbox series

[v6,03/10] vhost-vdpa: protect concurrent access to vhost device iotlb

Message ID 20210331080519.172-4-xieyongji@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace | expand

Commit Message

Yongji Xie March 31, 2021, 8:05 a.m. UTC
Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
concurrent access.

Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Michael S. Tsirkin April 9, 2021, 4:15 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:05:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
> concurrent access.
> 
> Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

I could not figure out whether there's a bug there now.
If yes when is the concurrent access triggered?

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 3947fbc2d1d5..63b28d3aee7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -725,9 +725,11 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>  	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>  	int r = 0;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
> +
>  	r = vhost_dev_check_owner(dev);
>  	if (r)
> -		return r;
> +		goto unlock;
>  
>  	switch (msg->type) {
>  	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
> @@ -748,6 +750,8 @@ static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
>  		r = -EINVAL;
>  		break;
>  	}
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.11.0
Yongji Xie April 11, 2021, 5:36 a.m. UTC | #2
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:16 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:05:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
> > concurrent access.
> >
> > Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
> I could not figure out whether there's a bug there now.
> If yes when is the concurrent access triggered?
>

When userspace sends the VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2 message concurrently?

vhost_vdpa_chr_write_iter -> vhost_chr_write_iter ->
vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg()

Thanks,
Yongji
Michael S. Tsirkin April 11, 2021, 8:48 p.m. UTC | #3
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:36:18PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:16 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:05:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > > Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
> > > concurrent access.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> >
> > I could not figure out whether there's a bug there now.
> > If yes when is the concurrent access triggered?
> >
> 
> When userspace sends the VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2 message concurrently?
> 
> vhost_vdpa_chr_write_iter -> vhost_chr_write_iter ->
> vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg()
> 
> Thanks,
> Yongji

And then what happens currently?
Yongji Xie April 12, 2021, 2:29 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:49 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:36:18PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:16 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:05:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > > > Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
> > > > concurrent access.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > I could not figure out whether there's a bug there now.
> > > If yes when is the concurrent access triggered?
> > >
> >
> > When userspace sends the VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2 message concurrently?
> >
> > vhost_vdpa_chr_write_iter -> vhost_chr_write_iter ->
> > vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg()
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yongji
>
> And then what happens currently?
>

Then we might access vhost_vdpa_map() concurrently and cause
corruption of the list and interval tree in struct vhost_iotlb.

Thanks,
Yongji
Michael S. Tsirkin April 12, 2021, 9 a.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 10:29:17AM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:49 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 01:36:18PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:16 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:05:12PM +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > > > > Use vhost_dev->mutex to protect vhost device iotlb from
> > > > > concurrent access.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 4c8cf318("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend")
> > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> > > > > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
> > > >
> > > > I could not figure out whether there's a bug there now.
> > > > If yes when is the concurrent access triggered?
> > > >
> > >
> > > When userspace sends the VHOST_IOTLB_MSG_V2 message concurrently?
> > >
> > > vhost_vdpa_chr_write_iter -> vhost_chr_write_iter ->
> > > vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg()
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yongji
> >
> > And then what happens currently?
> >
> 
> Then we might access vhost_vdpa_map() concurrently and cause
> corruption of the list and interval tree in struct vhost_iotlb.
> 
> Thanks,
> Yongji

OK. Sounds like it's actually needed in this release if possible.  Pls
add this info in the commit log and post it as a separate patch.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
index 3947fbc2d1d5..63b28d3aee7c 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
@@ -725,9 +725,11 @@  static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 	const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
 	int r = 0;
 
+	mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
+
 	r = vhost_dev_check_owner(dev);
 	if (r)
-		return r;
+		goto unlock;
 
 	switch (msg->type) {
 	case VHOST_IOTLB_UPDATE:
@@ -748,6 +750,8 @@  static int vhost_vdpa_process_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
 		r = -EINVAL;
 		break;
 	}
+unlock:
+	mutex_unlock(&dev->mutex);
 
 	return r;
 }