From patchwork Tue May 11 02:42:13 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Like Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 12249583 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A6DC433ED for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 02:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4A86157F for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 02:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230442AbhEKCp0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 22:45:26 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:39588 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230439AbhEKCpI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2021 22:45:08 -0400 IronPort-SDR: TlPgKjs+UMx44UTkPuaWCocpAZ4/YKfH5BSYXBjpu6Wx1AYUauXRBjsNKrJKM65MNXIDVob6Dc frVAKJWqjMgA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9980"; a="199015656" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,290,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="199015656" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2021 19:44:03 -0700 IronPort-SDR: J41q9Qu854HboYETMwsjLabXZF6hMgJzEMsuLqCuINGZTs3h5+qW5EfWtrCI6a6fj8IOn/AsJL vk6K4+Hl7K9A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,290,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="468592084" Received: from clx-ap-likexu.sh.intel.com ([10.239.48.108]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2021 19:43:59 -0700 From: Like Xu To: Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Borislav Petkov , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , weijiang.yang@intel.com, Kan Liang , ak@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, eranian@google.com, liuxiangdong5@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Like Xu Subject: [PATCH v6 15/16] KVM: x86/cpuid: Refactor host/guest CPU model consistency check Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 10:42:13 +0800 Message-Id: <20210511024214.280733-16-like.xu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210511024214.280733-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com> References: <20210511024214.280733-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org For the same purpose, the leagcy intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible() can be renamed for reuse by more callers, and remove the comment about LBR use case can be deleted by the way. Signed-off-by: Like Xu --- arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 5 +++++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 12 +----------- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 1 - 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h index c99edfff7f82..439ce776b9a0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h @@ -143,6 +143,11 @@ static inline int guest_cpuid_model(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) return x86_model(best->eax); } +static inline bool cpuid_model_is_consistent(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + return boot_cpu_data.x86_model == guest_cpuid_model(vcpu); +} + static inline int guest_cpuid_stepping(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *best; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c index d0610716675b..a706d3597720 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c @@ -173,16 +173,6 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_fw_gp_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr) return get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0); } -bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) -{ - /* - * As a first step, a guest could only enable LBR feature if its - * cpu model is the same as the host because the LBR registers - * would be pass-through to the guest and they're model specific. - */ - return boot_cpu_data.x86_model == guest_cpuid_model(vcpu); -} - bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr = vcpu_to_lbr_records(vcpu); @@ -578,7 +568,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) nested_vmx_pmu_entry_exit_ctls_update(vcpu); - if (intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(vcpu)) + if (cpuid_model_is_consistent(vcpu)) x86_perf_get_lbr(&lbr_desc->records); else lbr_desc->records.nr = 0; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index e43d58020c75..e11efe9d2ff4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -2306,7 +2306,7 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) if ((data & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT) != (vmx_get_perf_capabilities() & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT)) return 1; - if (!intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(vcpu)) + if (!cpuid_model_is_consistent(vcpu)) return 1; } ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h index 72f1175e474b..3afdcebb0a11 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h @@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ union vmx_exit_reason { #define vcpu_to_lbr_records(vcpu) (&to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.records) void intel_pmu_cross_mapped_check(struct kvm_pmu *pmu); -bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); int intel_pmu_create_guest_lbr_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);