diff mbox series

[v3] x86: Add a test for AMD SEV-ES guest #VC handling

Message ID 20210602141447.18629-1-varadgautam@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v3] x86: Add a test for AMD SEV-ES guest #VC handling | expand

Commit Message

Varad Gautam June 2, 2021, 2:14 p.m. UTC
From: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>

Some vmexits on a SEV-ES guest need special handling within the guest
before exiting to the hypervisor. This must happen within the guest's
\#VC exception handler, triggered on every non automatic exit.

Add a KUnit based test to validate Linux's VC handling. The test:
1. installs a kretprobe on the #VC handler (sev_es_ghcb_hv_call, to
   access GHCB before/after the resulting VMGEXIT).
2. tiggers an NAE.
3. checks that the kretprobe was hit with the right exit_code available
   in GHCB.

Since relying on kprobes, the test does not cover NMI contexts.

Signed-off-by: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/Makefile         |   8 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c

Comments

Joerg Roedel June 9, 2021, 2:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:14:47PM +0200, Varad Gautam wrote:
> From: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
> 
> Some vmexits on a SEV-ES guest need special handling within the guest
> before exiting to the hypervisor. This must happen within the guest's
> \#VC exception handler, triggered on every non automatic exit.
> 
> Add a KUnit based test to validate Linux's VC handling. The test:
> 1. installs a kretprobe on the #VC handler (sev_es_ghcb_hv_call, to
>    access GHCB before/after the resulting VMGEXIT).
> 2. tiggers an NAE.
> 3. checks that the kretprobe was hit with the right exit_code available
>    in GHCB.
> 
> Since relying on kprobes, the test does not cover NMI contexts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile         |   8 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This looks good to me except for the small comment below, thanks Varad.
I ran it in an SEV-ES guest and I am seeing the test results in dmesg.
Only thing I am missing is a 'rep movs' test for MMIO, but that can be
added later, so

Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

Btw, should we create a separate directory for such tests like
/arch/x86/tests/ or something along those lines?

> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 0045e1b441902..85b8ac450ba56 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1543,6 +1543,15 @@ config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
>  	  If set to N, then the encryption of system memory can be
>  	  activated with the mem_encrypt=on command line option.
>  
> +config AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC
> +	bool "Test for AMD SEV-ES VC exception handling."
> +	depends on AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
> +	select FUNCTION_TRACER
> +	select KPROBES
> +	select KUNIT
> +	help
> +	  Enable KUnit-based testing for AMD SEV-ES #VC exception handling.
> +

I think this should be in arch/x86/Kconfig.debug.
Varad Gautam June 16, 2021, 9:16 a.m. UTC | #2
On 6/9/21 4:50 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 04:14:47PM +0200, Varad Gautam wrote:
>> From: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
>>
>> Some vmexits on a SEV-ES guest need special handling within the guest
>> before exiting to the hypervisor. This must happen within the guest's
>> \#VC exception handler, triggered on every non automatic exit.
>>
>> Add a KUnit based test to validate Linux's VC handling. The test:
>> 1. installs a kretprobe on the #VC handler (sev_es_ghcb_hv_call, to
>>    access GHCB before/after the resulting VMGEXIT).
>> 2. tiggers an NAE.
>> 3. checks that the kretprobe was hit with the right exit_code available
>>    in GHCB.
>>
>> Since relying on kprobes, the test does not cover NMI contexts.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/Kconfig                 |   9 ++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/Makefile         |   8 ++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> This looks good to me except for the small comment below, thanks Varad.
> I ran it in an SEV-ES guest and I am seeing the test results in dmesg.
> Only thing I am missing is a 'rep movs' test for MMIO, but that can be
> added later, so
> 
> Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> 
> Btw, should we create a separate directory for such tests like
> /arch/x86/tests/ or something along those lines?
> 

Thanks, I've sent out a v4 with the test moved to arch/x86/tests. This is
now hidden behind a CONFIG_X86_TESTS, where more stuff can be plugged in.

>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index 0045e1b441902..85b8ac450ba56 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -1543,6 +1543,15 @@ config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
>>  	  If set to N, then the encryption of system memory can be
>>  	  activated with the mem_encrypt=on command line option.
>>  
>> +config AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC
>> +	bool "Test for AMD SEV-ES VC exception handling."
>> +	depends on AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
>> +	select FUNCTION_TRACER
>> +	select KPROBES
>> +	select KUNIT
>> +	help
>> +	  Enable KUnit-based testing for AMD SEV-ES #VC exception handling.
>> +
> 
> I think this should be in arch/x86/Kconfig.debug.
> 
Ack, also moved in v4.

Varad
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 0045e1b441902..85b8ac450ba56 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1543,6 +1543,15 @@  config AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT_ACTIVE_BY_DEFAULT
 	  If set to N, then the encryption of system memory can be
 	  activated with the mem_encrypt=on command line option.
 
+config AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC
+	bool "Test for AMD SEV-ES VC exception handling."
+	depends on AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT
+	select FUNCTION_TRACER
+	select KPROBES
+	select KUNIT
+	help
+	  Enable KUnit-based testing for AMD SEV-ES #VC exception handling.
+
 # Common NUMA Features
 config NUMA
 	bool "NUMA Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support"
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
index 0f66682ac02a6..1632d6156be6e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
@@ -23,6 +23,13 @@  CFLAGS_REMOVE_head64.o = -pg
 CFLAGS_REMOVE_sev.o = -pg
 endif
 
+# AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC registers a kprobe by function name. IPA-SRA creates
+# function copies and renames them to have an .isra suffix, which breaks kprobes'
+# lookup. Build with -fno-ipa-sra for the test.
+ifdef CONFIG_AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC
+CFLAGS_sev.o	+= -fno-ipa-sra
+endif
+
 KASAN_SANITIZE_head$(BITS).o				:= n
 KASAN_SANITIZE_dumpstack.o				:= n
 KASAN_SANITIZE_dumpstack_$(BITS).o			:= n
@@ -149,6 +156,7 @@  obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER)	+= unwind_frame.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_UNWINDER_GUESS)		+= unwind_guess.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)		+= sev.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_SEV_ES_TEST_VC)	+= sev-es-test-vc.o
 ###
 # 64 bit specific files
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..98dc38572ed5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-es-test-vc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2021 SUSE
+ *
+ * Author: Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@suse.com>
+ */
+
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
+#include <asm/debugreg.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
+#include <asm/sev-common.h>
+#include <asm/svm.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/kprobes.h>
+
+static struct kretprobe hv_call_krp;
+
+static int hv_call_krp_entry(struct kretprobe_instance *krpi,
+			     struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned long ghcb_vaddr = regs_get_kernel_argument(regs, 0);
+	*((unsigned long *) krpi->data) = ghcb_vaddr;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int hv_call_krp_ret(struct kretprobe_instance *krpi,
+			   struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	unsigned long ghcb_vaddr = *((unsigned long *) krpi->data);
+	struct ghcb *ghcb = (struct ghcb *) ghcb_vaddr;
+	struct kunit *test = current->kunit_test;
+
+	if (test && strstr(test->name, "sev_es_") && test->priv)
+		cmpxchg((unsigned long *) test->priv, ghcb->save.sw_exit_code, 1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int sev_es_test_vc_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!sev_es_active()) {
+		kunit_info(test, "Not a SEV-ES guest. Skipping.");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	memset(&hv_call_krp, 0, sizeof(hv_call_krp));
+	hv_call_krp.entry_handler = hv_call_krp_entry;
+	hv_call_krp.handler = hv_call_krp_ret;
+	hv_call_krp.maxactive = 100;
+	hv_call_krp.data_size = sizeof(unsigned long);
+	hv_call_krp.kp.symbol_name = "sev_es_ghcb_hv_call";
+	hv_call_krp.kp.addr = 0;
+
+	ret = register_kretprobe(&hv_call_krp);
+	if (ret) {
+		kunit_info(test, "Could not register kretprobe. Skipping.");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	test->priv = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(unsigned long), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!test->priv) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		kunit_info(test, "Could not allocate. Skipping.");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+out:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+void sev_es_test_vc_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	if (test->priv)
+		kunit_kfree(test, test->priv);
+
+	if (hv_call_krp.kp.addr)
+		unregister_kretprobe(&hv_call_krp);
+}
+
+#define guarded_op(kt, ec, op)						\
+do {									\
+	struct kunit *t = (struct kunit *) kt;				\
+	smp_store_release((typeof(ec) *) t->priv, ec);			\
+	op;								\
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(t, (typeof(ec)) 1, 				\
+		(typeof(ec)) smp_load_acquire((typeof(ec) *) t->priv));	\
+} while(0)
+
+static void sev_es_nae_cpuid(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	unsigned int cpuid_fn = 0x8000001f;
+
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_CPUID, native_cpuid_eax(cpuid_fn));
+}
+
+static void sev_es_nae_wbinvd(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_WBINVD, wbinvd());
+}
+
+static void sev_es_nae_msr(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_MSR, __rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC));
+}
+
+static void sev_es_nae_dr7_rw(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_WRITE_DR7,
+		   native_set_debugreg(7, native_get_debugreg(7)));
+}
+
+static void sev_es_nae_ioio(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	unsigned long port = 0x80;
+	char val = 0;
+
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_IOIO, val = inb(port));
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_IOIO, outb(val, port));
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_IOIO, insb(port, &val, sizeof(val)));
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_EXIT_IOIO, outsb(port, &val, sizeof(val)));
+}
+
+static void sev_es_nae_mmio(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	unsigned long lapic_ver_pa = 0xfee00030; /* APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE + APIC_LVR */
+	unsigned __iomem *lapic = ioremap(lapic_ver_pa, 0x4);
+	unsigned lapic_version = 0;
+
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_VMGEXIT_MMIO_READ, lapic_version = *lapic);
+	guarded_op(test, SVM_VMGEXIT_MMIO_WRITE, *lapic = lapic_version);
+
+	iounmap(lapic);
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case sev_es_vc_testcases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_cpuid),
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_wbinvd),
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_msr),
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_dr7_rw),
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_ioio),
+	KUNIT_CASE(sev_es_nae_mmio),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite sev_es_vc_test_suite = {
+	.name = "sev_es_test_vc",
+	.init = sev_es_test_vc_init,
+	.exit = sev_es_test_vc_exit,
+	.test_cases = sev_es_vc_testcases,
+};
+kunit_test_suite(sev_es_vc_test_suite);