From patchwork Wed Nov 17 06:43:51 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Reiji Watanabe X-Patchwork-Id: 12623855 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75A9C433F5 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD85463240 for ; Wed, 17 Nov 2021 06:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233968AbhKQG4k (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:56:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36904 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233964AbhKQG4j (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 01:56:39 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1049.google.com (mail-pj1-x1049.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1049]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9AF5C061570 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:53:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1049.google.com with SMTP id mn13-20020a17090b188d00b001a64f277c1eso2631909pjb.2 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:53:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Amc04gsXjzkn+vjiDgw0OgbmKYNLvSS2/kqn0hw3weE=; b=Be2YyTojkLCu9YEXlOJwcvNwijfwGmtrTojbG8RXAybGDqfnHBYiPKUSnvVZlfBEZH Xlk8JuxOCy5zDu6joNjSKNnlj4pcnHBYYjZwI/GTf+l6HScQoc/ZSoZVG9d9Lb6IwAiv Hd1RnT9anrnn17DoPDMNemBeNGbTh8S4c4pHFc5CZ2WFOswIARxDUv4PGNeDaWvAtDI7 MIMCSC7obwyC1XtO1lLqbIob8WlWamA29f44TXMuYIWeNwQTks3Q5vpi/yM5Wn5hwn49 0vCbjLY47br7WG/C1sTsj1FxRv7HllnuskXK5wrYVL2frKNoGOmoLITv9Mi+4Rl9ejPx eThg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Amc04gsXjzkn+vjiDgw0OgbmKYNLvSS2/kqn0hw3weE=; b=4XJTlcaZLaiU3qIRXfZ0b0qA7wy23cAoKnQCQLAtHRFt/8CKRSd/3l5pAwaRidbOdC 4YYNIfdejt+Qm95eR5aasLNCzvDi/IgEDF/0bMQhEB0lcQaR7YsoZvPIpGin8bnG/sLD gJ/VS+Mni/Di2Dfebomejy32JYCxbWtyTT3UipBlNnayy84Fs/3L8pxBJpewnDt+J2h4 164JwrDrxf4erjgbSjWLEoGt4mGKPRuUY/q2VPnLm4CpHZQ7W+mLtK1TsPkdJiyttaYS 8EhzTuvko5LNu2cUpl66mB1SCGvtaBQJ+VNfv9+V3AI9GXgJ5MJmwGWnLgf4Ozg8dG+Z suLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530DahIZ93zoFmumghK17JwVGcu3dOb90IseoaXJ+mmejkDSAgDa S0xdJDMnlmTKVSPHB43LuHnyJ2CXk5s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwaOePmyjg4Hc7vZIE16txaFDjohjlCKsgeQ1wSfRlTJ+Jyp/xqcbs1/JJuveMw6sbd0jRvkRvOd20= X-Received: from reiji-vws-sp.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:3d59]) (user=reijiw job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:90a:390c:: with SMTP id y12mr314836pjb.0.1637132021101; Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:53:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 22:43:51 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com> Message-Id: <20211117064359.2362060-22-reijiw@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20211117064359.2362060-1-reijiw@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.0.rc1.387.gb447b232ab-goog Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 21/29] KVM: arm64: Introduce framework to trap disabled features From: Reiji Watanabe To: Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Suzuki K Poulose , Paolo Bonzini , Will Deacon , Andrew Jones , Peng Liang , Peter Shier , Ricardo Koller , Oliver Upton , Jing Zhang , Raghavendra Rao Anata , Reiji Watanabe Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org When a CPU feature that is supported on the host is not exposed to its guest, emulating a real CPU's behavior (by trapping or disabling guest's using the feature) is generally a desirable behavior (when it's possible without any or little side effect). Introduce feature_config_ctrl structure, which manages feature information to program configuration register to trap or disable the feature when the feature is not exposed to the guest, and functions that uses the structure to activate trapping the feature. At present, no feature has feature_config_ctrl yet and the following patches will add the feature_config_ctrl for several features. Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe --- arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c index 2f96103fc0d2..501de08dacb7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c @@ -376,8 +376,38 @@ static int arm64_check_features(u64 check_types, u64 val, u64 lim) (cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(val, ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_SHIFT) >= \ ID_AA64ISAR1_GPI_IMP_DEF) +enum vcpu_config_reg { + VCPU_HCR_EL2 = 1, + VCPU_MDCR_EL2, + VCPU_CPTR_EL2, +}; + +/* + * Feature information to program configuration register to trap or disable + * guest's using a feature when the feature is not exposed to the guest. + */ +struct feature_config_ctrl { + /* ID register/field for the feature */ + u32 ftr_reg; /* ID register */ + bool ftr_signed; /* Is the feature field signed ? */ + u8 ftr_shift; /* Field of ID register for the feature */ + s8 ftr_min; /* Min value that indicate the feature */ + + /* + * Function to check trapping is needed. This is used when the above + * fields are not enough to determine if trapping is needed. + */ + bool (*ftr_need_trap)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); + + /* Configuration register information to trap the feature. */ + enum vcpu_config_reg cfg_reg; /* Configuration register */ + u64 cfg_mask; /* Field of the configuration register */ + u64 cfg_val; /* Value that are set for the field */ +}; + struct id_reg_info { u32 sys_reg; /* Register ID */ + u64 sys_val; /* Sanitized system value */ /* * Limit value of the register for a vcpu. The value is the sanitized @@ -410,11 +440,15 @@ struct id_reg_info { /* Return the reset value of the register for the vCPU */ u64 (*get_reset_val)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct id_reg_info *id_reg); + + /* Information to trap features that are disabled for the guest */ + const struct feature_config_ctrl *(*trap_features)[]; }; static void id_reg_info_init(struct id_reg_info *id_reg) { - id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id_reg->sys_reg); + id_reg->sys_val = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(id_reg->sys_reg); + id_reg->vcpu_limit_val = id_reg->sys_val; if (id_reg->init) id_reg->init(id_reg); } @@ -952,6 +986,47 @@ static int validate_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, return err; } +static void feature_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct feature_config_ctrl *config) +{ + u64 *reg_ptr, reg_val; + + switch (config->cfg_reg) { + case VCPU_HCR_EL2: + reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.hcr_el2; + break; + case VCPU_MDCR_EL2: + reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2; + break; + case VCPU_CPTR_EL2: + reg_ptr = &vcpu->arch.cptr_el2; + break; + } + + /* Update cfg_mask fields with cfg_val */ + reg_val = (*reg_ptr & ~config->cfg_mask); + reg_val |= config->cfg_val; + *reg_ptr = reg_val; +} + +static inline bool feature_avail(const struct feature_config_ctrl *ctrl, + u64 id_val) +{ + int field_val = cpuid_feature_extract_field(id_val, + ctrl->ftr_shift, ctrl->ftr_signed); + + return (field_val >= ctrl->ftr_min); +} + +static inline bool vcpu_feature_is_available(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct feature_config_ctrl *ctrl) +{ + u64 val; + + val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, ctrl->ftr_reg); + return feature_avail(ctrl, val); +} + /* * ARMv8.1 mandates at least a trivial LORegion implementation, where all the * RW registers are RES0 (which we can implement as RAZ/WI). On an ARMv8.0 @@ -1831,6 +1906,42 @@ static int reg_from_user(u64 *val, const void __user *uaddr, u64 id); static int reg_to_user(void __user *uaddr, const u64 *val, u64 id); static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg); +static void id_reg_features_trap_activate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + const struct id_reg_info *id_reg) +{ + u64 val; + int i = 0; + const struct feature_config_ctrl **ctrlp_array, *ctrl; + + if (!id_reg || !id_reg->trap_features) + /* No information to trap a feature */ + return; + + val = __read_id_reg(vcpu, id_reg->sys_reg); + if (val == id_reg->sys_val) + /* No feature needs to be trapped (no feature is disabled). */ + return; + + ctrlp_array = *id_reg->trap_features; + while ((ctrl = ctrlp_array[i++]) != NULL) { + if (ctrl->ftr_need_trap && ctrl->ftr_need_trap(vcpu)) { + feature_trap_activate(vcpu, ctrl); + continue; + } + + if (!feature_avail(ctrl, id_reg->sys_val)) + /* The feature is not supported on the host. */ + continue; + + if (feature_avail(ctrl, val)) + /* The feature is enabled for the guest. */ + continue; + + /* The feature is supported but disabled. */ + feature_trap_activate(vcpu, ctrl); + } +} + /* Visibility overrides for SVE-specific control registers */ static unsigned int sve_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd) @@ -3457,6 +3568,14 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices) return write_demux_regids(uindices); } +void kvm_vcpu_init_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_info_table); i++) + id_reg_features_trap_activate(vcpu, id_reg_info_table[i]); +} + /* ID register's fractional field information with its feature field. */ struct feature_frac { u32 id;