diff mbox series

[kvm-unit-tests] x86/pmu: Make "ref cycles" test to pass on the latest cpu

Message ID 20211122115758.46504-1-likexu@tencent.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [kvm-unit-tests] x86/pmu: Make "ref cycles" test to pass on the latest cpu | expand

Commit Message

Like Xu Nov. 22, 2021, 11:57 a.m. UTC 
From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>

Expand the boundary for "ref cycles" event test as it has
been observed that the results do not fit on some CPUs [1]:

FAIL: full-width writes: ref cycles-N
  100000 >= 87765 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 87926 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 87790 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 87687 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 87875 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 88043 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 88161 <= 30000000
  100000 >= 88052 <= 30000000

[1] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8374C CPU @ 2.70GHz

Opportunistically fix cc1 warnings for commented print statement.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
---
 x86/pmu.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 92206ad..3d05384 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@  struct pmu_event {
 } gp_events[] = {
 	{"core cycles", 0x003c, 1*N, 50*N},
 	{"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
-	{"ref cycles", 0x013c, 0.1*N, 30*N},
+       {"ref cycles", 0x013c, 0.08*N, 30*N},
 	{"llc refference", 0x4f2e, 1, 2*N},
 	{"llc misses", 0x412e, 1, 1*N},
 	{"branches", 0x00c4, 1*N, 1.1*N},
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@  static void measure(pmu_counter_t *evt, int count)
 
 static bool verify_event(uint64_t count, struct pmu_event *e)
 {
-	// printf("%lld >= %lld <= %lld\n", e->min, count, e->max);
+	// printf("%d >= %ld <= %d\n", e->min, count, e->max);
 	return count >= e->min  && count <= e->max;
 
 }