Message ID | 20211129200150.351436-9-maz@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support | expand |
Hi Marc, On Mon Nov 29 15:00:49 EST 2021, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote: > From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at arm.com> > > Reset the VCPU with PSTATE.M = EL2h when the nested virtualization > feature is enabled on the VCPU. > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at arm.com> > [maz: rework register reset not to use empty data structures] > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > index 426bd7fbc3fd..38a7182819fb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> > #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h> > #include <asm/virt.h> > > /* Maximum phys_shift supported for any VM on this host */ > @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static u32 kvm_ipa_limit; > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1 (PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > +#define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2 (PSR_MODE_EL2h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > + PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > + > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC (PSR_AA32_MODE_SVC | PSR_AA32_A_BIT | \ > PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT) > > @@ -176,8 +180,8 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit) > return false; > > - /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ > - if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit) > + /* MTE and NV are incompatible with AArch32 */ > + if ((kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) || nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) && is32bit) > return false; Should something similar be done for SVE? I see from the ID register emulation that SVE is hidden from the guest but there isn't anything in kvm_vcpu_enable_sve() that checks if NV is in use. That means it's possible to have both nested_virt_in_use(vcpu) and vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) be true simultaneously. If that happens, the FPSIMD fixup can get confused /* * Don't handle SVE traps for non-SVE vcpus here. This * includes NV guests for the time being. */ if (!sve_guest && (esr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD || guest_hyp_fpsimd_traps_enabled(vcpu))) return false; and incorrectly restore the wrong context instead of forwarding a FPSIMD trap to the guest hypervisor. Thanks, Chase > /* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */ > @@ -255,6 +259,8 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > default: > if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) { > pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC; > + } else if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) { > + pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2; > } else { > pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1; > } > -- > 2.30.2
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> > > Reset the VCPU with PSTATE.M = EL2h when the nested virtualization > feature is enabled on the VCPU. > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> > [maz: rework register reset not to use empty data structures] > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> However, a couple of comments below. > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > index 426bd7fbc3fd..38a7182819fb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> > #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h> > #include <asm/virt.h> > > /* Maximum phys_shift supported for any VM on this host */ > @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static u32 kvm_ipa_limit; > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1 (PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > +#define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2 (PSR_MODE_EL2h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > + PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > + > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC (PSR_AA32_MODE_SVC | PSR_AA32_A_BIT | \ > PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT) > > @@ -176,8 +180,8 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit) > return false; > > - /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ > - if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit) > + /* MTE and NV are incompatible with AArch32 */ > + if ((kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) || nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) && is32bit) > return false; It seems we have a bunch of: if (something && is32bit) return false; tests here - would it make sense to do: if (is32bit) { if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) return false; /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) return false; /* NV is incompatible with AArch32 */ if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) return false; } in terms of improved readability? > @@ -255,6 +259,8 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > default: > if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) { > pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC; > + } else if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) { > + pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2; > } else { > pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1; > } Not an issue with your patch, but the switch around this looks useless. The only case is this default case, so it's entirely a no-op.
On Fri, 07 Jan 2022 21:54:01 +0000, Chase Conklin <chase.conklin@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > On Mon Nov 29 15:00:49 EST 2021, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote: > > From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at arm.com> > > > > Reset the VCPU with PSTATE.M = EL2h when the nested virtualization > > feature is enabled on the VCPU. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at arm.com> > > [maz: rework register reset not to use empty data structures] > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org> > > --- > > arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > index 426bd7fbc3fd..38a7182819fb 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > > #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > > +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h> > > #include <asm/virt.h> > > > > /* Maximum phys_shift supported for any VM on this host */ > > @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static u32 kvm_ipa_limit; > > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1 (PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > > PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > > > +#define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2 (PSR_MODE_EL2h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > > + PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > + > > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC (PSR_AA32_MODE_SVC | PSR_AA32_A_BIT | \ > > PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT) > > > > @@ -176,8 +180,8 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit) > > return false; > > > > - /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ > > - if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit) > > + /* MTE and NV are incompatible with AArch32 */ > > + if ((kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) || nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) && is32bit) > > return false; > > Should something similar be done for SVE? I see from the ID register emulation > that SVE is hidden from the guest but there isn't anything in > kvm_vcpu_enable_sve() that checks if NV is in use. That means it's possible to > have both nested_virt_in_use(vcpu) and vcpu_has_sve(vcpu) be true > simultaneously. If that happens, the FPSIMD fixup can get confused > > /* > * Don't handle SVE traps for non-SVE vcpus here. This > * includes NV guests for the time being. > */ > if (!sve_guest && (esr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD || > guest_hyp_fpsimd_traps_enabled(vcpu))) > return false; > > and incorrectly restore the wrong context instead of forwarding a > FPSIMD trap to the guest hypervisor. Yes, nice catch. I have added this to kvm_reset_vcpu() to prevent the issue. if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu) && vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_SVE)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto out; } I may also rename nested_virt_in_use() to vcpu_has_nv(), which would fit the rest of the code a bit better. Thanks, M.
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 17:06:10 +0000, "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:00:49PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> > > > > Reset the VCPU with PSTATE.M = EL2h when the nested virtualization > > feature is enabled on the VCPU. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com> > > [maz: rework register reset not to use empty data structures] > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> > > However, a couple of comments below. > > > --- > > arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 10 ++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > index 426bd7fbc3fd..38a7182819fb 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c > > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > > #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> > > #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> > > +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h> > > #include <asm/virt.h> > > > > /* Maximum phys_shift supported for any VM on this host */ > > @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static u32 kvm_ipa_limit; > > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1 (PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > > PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > > > +#define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2 (PSR_MODE_EL2h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ > > + PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) > > + > > #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC (PSR_AA32_MODE_SVC | PSR_AA32_A_BIT | \ > > PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT) > > > > @@ -176,8 +180,8 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit) > > return false; > > > > - /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ > > - if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit) > > + /* MTE and NV are incompatible with AArch32 */ > > + if ((kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) || nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) && is32bit) > > return false; > > It seems we have a bunch of: > > if (something && is32bit) > return false; > > tests here - would it make sense to do: > > if (is32bit) { > if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) > return false; > > /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ > if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm)) > return false; > > /* NV is incompatible with AArch32 */ > if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) > return false; > } > > in terms of improved readability? Agreed. I've now reworked to follow this pattern. Thanks, M.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c index 426bd7fbc3fd..38a7182819fb 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include <asm/kvm_asm.h> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h> #include <asm/kvm_mmu.h> +#include <asm/kvm_nested.h> #include <asm/virt.h> /* Maximum phys_shift supported for any VM on this host */ @@ -38,6 +39,9 @@ static u32 kvm_ipa_limit; #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1 (PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) +#define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2 (PSR_MODE_EL2h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | \ + PSR_F_BIT | PSR_D_BIT) + #define VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC (PSR_AA32_MODE_SVC | PSR_AA32_A_BIT | \ PSR_AA32_I_BIT | PSR_AA32_F_BIT) @@ -176,8 +180,8 @@ static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit) return false; - /* MTE is incompatible with AArch32 */ - if (kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) && is32bit) + /* MTE and NV are incompatible with AArch32 */ + if ((kvm_has_mte(vcpu->kvm) || nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) && is32bit) return false; /* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */ @@ -255,6 +259,8 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) default: if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) { pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC; + } else if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) { + pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL2; } else { pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1; }