diff mbox series

[v3,07/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Separate shadow MMU sp allocation from initialization

Message ID 20220401175554.1931568-8-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack April 1, 2022, 5:55 p.m. UTC
Separate the code that allocates a new shadow page from the vCPU caches
from the code that initializes it. This is in preparation for creating
new shadow pages from VM ioctls for eager page splitting, where we do
not have access to the vCPU caches.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index abfb3e5d1372..421fcbc97f9e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1716,16 +1716,9 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	sp->spt = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_shadow_page_cache);
 	if (!direct)
 		sp->gfns = kvm_mmu_memory_cache_alloc(&vcpu->arch.mmu_gfn_array_cache);
+
 	set_page_private(virt_to_page(sp->spt), (unsigned long)sp);
 
-	/*
-	 * active_mmu_pages must be a FIFO list, as kvm_zap_obsolete_pages()
-	 * depends on valid pages being added to the head of the list.  See
-	 * comments in kvm_zap_obsolete_pages().
-	 */
-	sp->mmu_valid_gen = vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_valid_gen;
-	list_add(&sp->link, &vcpu->kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
-	kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(vcpu->kvm, +1);
 	return sp;
 }
 
@@ -2123,27 +2116,31 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return sp;
 }
 
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_new_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-						    struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
-						    gfn_t gfn,
-						    union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
+static void init_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+			     struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
+			     union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
 {
-	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
 	struct hlist_head *sp_list;
 
-	++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
+	++kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss;
 
-	sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu, role.direct);
 	sp->gfn = gfn;
 	sp->role = role;
+	sp->mmu_valid_gen = kvm->arch.mmu_valid_gen;
 
-	sp_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)];
+	/*
+	 * active_mmu_pages must be a FIFO list, as kvm_zap_obsolete_pages()
+	 * depends on valid pages being added to the head of the list.  See
+	 * comments in kvm_zap_obsolete_pages().
+	 */
+	list_add(&sp->link, &kvm->arch.active_mmu_pages);
+	kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(kvm, 1);
+
+	sp_list = &kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)];
 	hlist_add_head(&sp->hash_link, sp_list);
 
 	if (!role.direct)
-		account_shadowed(vcpu->kvm, slot, sp);
-
-	return sp;
+		account_shadowed(kvm, slot, sp);
 }
 
 static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
@@ -2158,7 +2155,8 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (!sp) {
 		created = true;
 		slot = kvm_vcpu_gfn_to_memslot(vcpu, gfn);
-		sp = kvm_mmu_new_shadow_page(vcpu, slot, gfn, role);
+		sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu, role.direct);
+		init_shadow_page(vcpu->kvm, sp, slot, gfn, role);
 	}
 
 	trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, created);