diff mbox series

[v4,06/20] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename shadow MMU functions that deal with shadow pages

Message ID 20220422210546.458943-7-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack April 22, 2022, 9:05 p.m. UTC 
Rename 2 functions:

  kvm_mmu_get_page() -> kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page()
  kvm_mmu_free_page() -> kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page()

This change makes it clear that these functions deal with shadow pages
rather than struct pages. It also aligns these functions with the naming
scheme for kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() and kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page().

Prefer "shadow_page" over the shorter "sp" since these are core
functions and the line lengths aren't terrible.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Sean Christopherson May 5, 2022, 10:15 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022, David Matlack wrote:
> Rename 2 functions:
> 
>   kvm_mmu_get_page() -> kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page()
>   kvm_mmu_free_page() -> kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page()
> 
> This change makes it clear that these functions deal with shadow pages
> rather than struct pages. It also aligns these functions with the naming
> scheme for kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() and kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page().
> 
> Prefer "shadow_page" over the shorter "sp" since these are core
> functions and the line lengths aren't terrible.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 7d03320f6e08..fa7846760887 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1665,7 +1665,7 @@  static inline void kvm_mod_used_mmu_pages(struct kvm *kvm, long nr)
 	percpu_counter_add(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages, nr);
 }
 
-static void kvm_mmu_free_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
+static void kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page(struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	MMU_WARN_ON(!is_empty_shadow_page(sp->spt));
 	hlist_del(&sp->hash_link);
@@ -2109,8 +2109,9 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return sp;
 }
 
-static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
-					     union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
+static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+						    gfn_t gfn,
+						    union kvm_mmu_page_role role)
 {
 	struct hlist_head *sp_list;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
@@ -2170,7 +2171,7 @@  static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_child_sp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	union kvm_mmu_page_role role;
 
 	role = kvm_mmu_child_role(sptep, direct, access);
-	return kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
+	return kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
 }
 
 static void shadow_walk_init_using_root(struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator *iterator,
@@ -2446,7 +2447,7 @@  static void kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(sp, nsp, invalid_list, link) {
 		WARN_ON(!sp->role.invalid || sp->root_count);
-		kvm_mmu_free_page(sp);
+		kvm_mmu_free_shadow_page(sp);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3373,7 +3374,7 @@  static hpa_t mmu_alloc_root(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, int quadrant,
 	if (role.has_4_byte_gpte)
 		role.quadrant = quadrant;
 
-	sp = kvm_mmu_get_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
+	sp = kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, role);
 	++sp->root_count;
 
 	return __pa(sp->spt);