@@ -17,9 +17,6 @@
#include "processor.h"
#include "test_util.h"
-#define VCPU_ID_SOURCE 0
-#define VCPU_ID_TARGET 1
-
#define CPU_ON_ENTRY_ADDR 0xfeedf00dul
#define CPU_ON_CONTEXT_ID 0xdeadc0deul
@@ -72,6 +69,7 @@ static void guest_main(uint64_t target_cpu)
int main(void)
{
uint64_t target_mpidr, obs_pc, obs_x0;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu0, *vcpu1;
struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct ucall uc;
@@ -82,19 +80,19 @@ int main(void)
vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PSCI_0_2);
- aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE, &init, guest_main);
+ vcpu0 = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_main);
/*
* make sure the target is already off when executing the test.
*/
init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF);
- aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, VCPU_ID_TARGET, &init, guest_main);
+ vcpu1 = aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 1, &init, guest_main);
- get_reg(vm, VCPU_ID_TARGET, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), &target_mpidr);
- vcpu_args_set(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE, 1, target_mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK);
- vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE);
+ get_reg(vm, vcpu1->id, KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), &target_mpidr);
+ vcpu_args_set(vm, vcpu0->id, 1, target_mpidr & MPIDR_HWID_BITMASK);
+ vcpu_run(vm, vcpu0->id);
- switch (get_ucall(vm, VCPU_ID_SOURCE, &uc)) {
+ switch (get_ucall(vm, vcpu0->id, &uc)) {
case UCALL_DONE:
break;
case UCALL_ABORT:
@@ -105,8 +103,8 @@ int main(void)
TEST_FAIL("Unhandled ucall: %lu", uc.cmd);
}
- get_reg(vm, VCPU_ID_TARGET, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), &obs_pc);
- get_reg(vm, VCPU_ID_TARGET, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]), &obs_x0);
+ get_reg(vm, vcpu1->id, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.pc), &obs_pc);
+ get_reg(vm, vcpu1->id, ARM64_CORE_REG(regs.regs[0]), &obs_x0);
TEST_ASSERT(obs_pc == CPU_ON_ENTRY_ADDR,
"unexpected target cpu pc: %lx (expected: %lx)",
Pass around 'struct kvm_vcpu' objects in psci_cpu_on_test instead of relying on global VCPU_IDs. Ideally, the test wouldn't have to manually create vCPUs and thus care about vCPU IDs, but it's not the end of the world and avoiding that behavior isn't guaranteed to be a net positive (an attempt at macro shenanigans did not go very well). Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- .../selftests/kvm/aarch64/psci_cpu_on_test.c | 20 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)