From patchwork Fri May 13 20:28:09 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: David Matlack X-Patchwork-Id: 12849449 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F9FC433FE for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 20:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1384303AbiEMU3W (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2022 16:29:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59682 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1384319AbiEMU3H (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 May 2022 16:29:07 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x54a.google.com (mail-pg1-x54a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::54a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51DF977F05 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 13:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x54a.google.com with SMTP id g63-20020a636b42000000b003db2a3daf30so4567145pgc.22 for ; Fri, 13 May 2022 13:28:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=urKzIekSt4ry/GhLVLiJhh3xC2/RJ3LQSXDjmJ65Jo0=; b=SaiTMr31y0oDFEGzZykrrjRArqJzvgRKUcMLec6CD0eeeJdw2h4SF1ZSljm61841B3 AmJ/VRFocwNUPQkBUFwUUcMUpBofknPEHL5DUGjp76aPVMJhgUQM6C3uNz8lWCE/tyR7 pIlkytzLyhaE8cSGymt+um8sZy+EIk7cxiTPQHO6GITnj8uGSBWF7yh+q7BFLoYLxrTA w9XXi+mBxh5UIOpNkssUGV9OR9+uBMDhYF7Ou2gJCRCxVocEHh1SNHSxM3sDaGL4pSBQ PwdIhDi/xKCd+p9CKcgLe3OpjVPf24Jm2Peod+6Zj1tSjo2xRLjB2L0QM+rlXCZr0Oso 3t0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=urKzIekSt4ry/GhLVLiJhh3xC2/RJ3LQSXDjmJ65Jo0=; b=QBbAdJlxcDNJgWW90lQ+aFFta0pRi7qZKbRCdu5sGm6RhPX9jV9jkgZ4G7720eafFp z7L63khce7Joa6X1fdUfUx4mO4yiXNQeVCjhHcxIfhmSATkgg1dnBhpTfmoWXcemkKRy qNd+E/IhEtOuI8trP3zB5DYjLcrCaO3ri3ykILkeKakbvYVV1o/buUD5nq3zmbfPqhEV RXIQPN0s3DO6kzieMX4xwgVQACMzC870HTLXv3syccOX8NPk3VSXu7sXgvlAsx7Bet0w ElEjALyLBsafzA+5bnJ5wOBJ8gLL91FuEJzh9v9/jyIHT4Tm6j3URofI0/Jurff22Z3A BBDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531DhcJNUk5hS1uuJbA2ibGIiGVYXW5VGPgrGVAPixW22katFV95 ImdiTUWGjP9JQxKb3E7GJ70nV+6kVgZZqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJiiLUXK1V6iCWGjV271VoDavJxN+SADxyQxekrK4f71Ht/23h8YqqMMSjzWmGv8welIHLZcGk1iroJg== X-Received: from dmatlack-heavy.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:19cd]) (user=dmatlack job=sendgmr) by 2002:a62:a211:0:b0:50d:cdb2:87f4 with SMTP id m17-20020a62a211000000b0050dcdb287f4mr5959919pff.63.1652473730247; Fri, 13 May 2022 13:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 20:28:09 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220513202819.829591-1-dmatlack@google.com> Message-Id: <20220513202819.829591-12-dmatlack@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220513202819.829591-1-dmatlack@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.0.550.gb090851708-goog Subject: [PATCH v5 11/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Pass kvm pointer separately from vcpu to kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page() From: David Matlack To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marc Zyngier , Huacai Chen , Aleksandar Markovic , Anup Patel , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Sean Christopherson , Andrew Jones , Ben Gardon , Peter Xu , maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, "moderated list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR ARM64 (KVM/arm64)" , "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" , "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)" , "open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR RISC-V (KVM/riscv)" , Peter Feiner , Lai Jiangshan , David Matlack Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Get the kvm pointer from the caller, rather than deriving it from vcpu->kvm, and plumb the kvm pointer all the way from kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(). With this change in place, the vcpu pointer is only needed to sync indirect shadow pages. In other words, __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page() can now be used to get *direct* shadow pages without a vcpu pointer. This enables eager page splitting, which needs to allocate direct shadow pages during VM ioctls. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: David Matlack --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 9cc73c3453c3..cf27c5de9dc0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -2001,7 +2001,8 @@ static void clear_sp_write_flooding_count(u64 *spte) __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sptep_to_sp(spte)); } -static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, +static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn, struct hlist_head *sp_list, union kvm_mmu_page_role role) @@ -2011,7 +2012,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int collisions = 0; LIST_HEAD(invalid_list); - for_each_valid_sp(vcpu->kvm, sp, sp_list) { + for_each_valid_sp(kvm, sp, sp_list) { if (sp->gfn != gfn) { collisions++; continue; @@ -2028,7 +2029,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, * upper-level page will be write-protected. */ if (role.level > PG_LEVEL_4K && sp->unsync) - kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, sp, + kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(kvm, sp, &invalid_list); continue; } @@ -2056,7 +2057,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, WARN_ON(!list_empty(&invalid_list)); if (ret > 0) - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm); + kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(kvm); } __clear_sp_write_flooding_count(sp); @@ -2065,13 +2066,13 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, } sp = NULL; - ++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss; + ++kvm->stat.mmu_cache_miss; out: - kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(vcpu->kvm, &invalid_list); + kvm_mmu_commit_zap_page(kvm, &invalid_list); - if (collisions > vcpu->kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions) - vcpu->kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions = collisions; + if (collisions > kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions) + kvm->stat.max_mmu_page_hash_collisions = collisions; return sp; } @@ -2115,7 +2116,8 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm, return sp; } -static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, +static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm *kvm, + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct shadow_page_caches *caches, gfn_t gfn, union kvm_mmu_page_role role) @@ -2124,12 +2126,12 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *__kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp; bool created = false; - sp_list = &vcpu->kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)]; + sp_list = &kvm->arch.mmu_page_hash[kvm_page_table_hashfn(gfn)]; - sp = kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(vcpu, gfn, sp_list, role); + sp = kvm_mmu_find_shadow_page(kvm, vcpu, gfn, sp_list, role); if (!sp) { created = true; - sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(vcpu->kvm, caches, gfn, sp_list, role); + sp = kvm_mmu_alloc_shadow_page(kvm, caches, gfn, sp_list, role); } trace_kvm_mmu_get_page(sp, created); @@ -2146,7 +2148,7 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_page *kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, .gfn_array_cache = &vcpu->arch.mmu_gfn_array_cache, }; - return __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu, &caches, gfn, role); + return __kvm_mmu_get_shadow_page(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, &caches, gfn, role); } static union kvm_mmu_page_role kvm_mmu_child_role(u64 *sptep, bool direct, u32 access)