@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@
#include "test_util.h"
#include "kvm_util.h"
-#define VCPU_ID 6
-
#define ICPT_INSTRUCTION 0x04
#define IPA0_DIAG 0x8300
@@ -27,14 +25,15 @@ static void guest_code(void)
*/
static uint64_t diag318_handler(void)
{
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
struct kvm_vm *vm;
struct kvm_run *run;
uint64_t reg;
uint64_t diag318_info;
- vm = vm_create_default(VCPU_ID, 0, guest_code);
- vcpu_run(vm, VCPU_ID);
- run = vcpu_state(vm, VCPU_ID);
+ vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_code);
+ vcpu_run(vm, vcpu->id);
+ run = vcpu->run;
TEST_ASSERT(run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC,
"DIAGNOSE 0x0318 instruction was not intercepted");
Convert diag318_test_handler to use vm_create_with_vcpus() and pass around a 'struct kvm_vcpu' object instead of passing around vCPU IDs. Note, this is a "functional" change in the sense that the test now creates a vCPU with vcpu_id==0 instead of vcpu_id==6. The non-zero VCPU_ID was 100% arbitrary and added little to no validation coverage. If testing non-zero vCPU IDs is desirable for generic tests, that can be done in the future by tweaking the VM creation helpers. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> --- .../selftests/kvm/lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)