From patchwork Tue Jun 28 13:56:06 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Claudio Imbrenda X-Patchwork-Id: 12898335 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0985ECCA479 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347018AbiF1N4p (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:56:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33658 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346918AbiF1N4a (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:56:30 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F377B3335A; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 06:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25SDlSYG019251; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:29 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=nVxjbhDKJVU2SodTU+YqCP2t/lJgulhuO+wfOpNsDb8=; b=r9SluuKrRAZJGKnj7VQ44vd5gbEaGAILQE8tMrhYuE/YAS/onPwfLJrhc5ngq1doz6an 94RW+PNUZf6r3x/zZ6eSEbsbJizUlPiraUma6VTkLNDlEy01OYOsHyZpPKRdfLFqdJAY lvZ4pycoAHW7UgIqv8WwcTmx3XPiH9mPMHLwQIxT2b2KR1yFLEOI1gfdxqKR+/PiySFv XWKVVBVPwg9/ReTbsn8lS/rAq+X3lk6pVVFUxdBugG/3gKwq9LQdKt8UqFKzeoQzzskB WCRJ3IZSPADml//WkRR3YYnuwxi0kjETB4mzzhT2ePJIlnFUUnothogFzqC4oKUoQ6IK RA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h02u20aj9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:28 +0000 Received: from m0098410.ppops.net (m0098410.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25SDmT8v026234; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:28 GMT Received: from ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (6c.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.108]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3h02u20agv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:28 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 25SDptoG004903; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:25 GMT Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay10.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.195]) by ppma05fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3gwt093pt1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:25 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 25SDuMYV20054288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:22 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236B44C04A; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEDC4C050; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p-imbrenda.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.224.40]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:56:21 +0000 (GMT) From: Claudio Imbrenda To: kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: borntraeger@de.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scgl@linux.ibm.com, mimu@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v12 05/18] KVM: s390: pv: usage counter instead of flag Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 15:56:06 +0200 Message-Id: <20220628135619.32410-6-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220628135619.32410-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> References: <20220628135619.32410-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: gAS6Jzol-nAPJD0MupFmj0VnFTFkkIfK X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: URbEtE5MzdHv-ReLT3fOfT3vu08WmSF2 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-28_07,2022-06-28_01,2022-06-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206280057 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Use the new protected_count field as a counter instead of the old is_protected flag. This will be used in upcoming patches. Increment the counter when a secure configuration is created, and decrement it when it is destroyed. Previously the flag was set when the set secure parameters UVC was performed. Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda Acked-by: Janosch Frank --- arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h | 2 +- arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 2 +- arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +- arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 12 +++++++----- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h index 82aae78e1315..1572b3634cdd 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu.h @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ typedef struct { unsigned long asce_limit; unsigned long vdso_base; /* The mmu context belongs to a secure guest. */ - atomic_t is_protected; + atomic_t protected_count; /* * The following bitfields need a down_write on the mm * semaphore when they are written to. As they are only diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h index c7937f369e62..2a38af5a00c2 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mm->context.gmap_list); cpumask_clear(&mm->context.cpu_attach_mask); atomic_set(&mm->context.flush_count, 0); - atomic_set(&mm->context.is_protected, 0); + atomic_set(&mm->context.protected_count, 0); mm->context.gmap_asce = 0; mm->context.flush_mm = 0; #ifdef CONFIG_PGSTE diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h index a397b072a580..f16403ba81ec 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static inline int mm_has_pgste(struct mm_struct *mm) static inline int mm_is_protected(struct mm_struct *mm) { #ifdef CONFIG_PGSTE - if (unlikely(atomic_read(&mm->context.is_protected))) + if (unlikely(atomic_read(&mm->context.protected_count))) return 1; #endif return 0; diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c index bcbe10862f9f..f3134d79f8e1 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc) cc = uv_cmd_nodata(kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm), UVC_CMD_DESTROY_SEC_CONF, rc, rrc); WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0); - atomic_set(&kvm->mm->context.is_protected, 0); + if (!cc) + atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count); KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm failed rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); /* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */ @@ -208,11 +209,14 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc) /* Outputs */ kvm->arch.pv.handle = uvcb.guest_handle; + atomic_inc(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count); if (cc) { - if (uvcb.header.rc & UVC_RC_NEED_DESTROY) + if (uvcb.header.rc & UVC_RC_NEED_DESTROY) { kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &dummy, &dummy); - else + } else { + atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count); kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm); + } return -EIO; } kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle; @@ -235,8 +239,6 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_set_sec_parms(struct kvm *kvm, void *hdr, u64 length, u16 *rc, *rrc = uvcb.header.rrc; KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT VM SET PARMS: rc %x rrc %x", *rc, *rrc); - if (!cc) - atomic_set(&kvm->mm->context.is_protected, 1); return cc ? -EINVAL : 0; }