From patchwork Tue Jul 26 07:22:11 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xuan Zhuo X-Patchwork-Id: 12928921 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEECFCCA48E for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 07:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238387AbiGZHYg (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 03:24:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238130AbiGZHXe (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2022 03:23:34 -0400 Received: from out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-43.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.43]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52F4F2B631; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 00:23:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R121e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018045170;MF=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=37;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0VKUIJzm_1658820199; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0VKUIJzm_1658820199) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:23:20 +0800 From: Xuan Zhuo To: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Richard Weinberger , Anton Ivanov , Johannes Berg , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Hans de Goede , Mark Gross , Vadim Pasternak , Bjorn Andersson , Mathieu Poirier , Cornelia Huck , Halil Pasic , Eric Farman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Alexander Gordeev , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Xuan Zhuo , Vincent Whitchurch , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kangjie.xu@linux.alibaba.com Subject: [PATCH v13 28/42] virtio_ring: struct virtqueue introduce reset Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:22:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20220726072225.19884-29-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.0 In-Reply-To: <20220726072225.19884-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20220726072225.19884-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Git-Hash: 19d2a6aae0b1 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Introduce a new member reset to the structure virtqueue to determine whether the current vq is in the reset state. Subsequent patches will use it. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo Acked-by: Jason Wang --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 ++ include/linux/virtio.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index a62e46df6865..df37b6ba0e2f 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c @@ -2005,6 +2005,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed( vq->vq.vdev = vdev; vq->vq.name = name; vq->vq.index = index; + vq->vq.reset = false; vq->we_own_ring = true; vq->notify = notify; vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers; @@ -2485,6 +2486,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index, vq->vq.vdev = vdev; vq->vq.name = name; vq->vq.index = index; + vq->vq.reset = false; vq->we_own_ring = false; vq->notify = notify; vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers; diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h index d45ee82a4470..a3f73bb6733e 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio.h @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ * @index: the zero-based ordinal number for this queue. * @num_free: number of elements we expect to be able to fit. * @num_max: the maximum number of elements supported by the device. + * @reset: vq is in reset state or not. * * A note on @num_free: with indirect buffers, each buffer needs one * element in the queue, otherwise a buffer will need one element per @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ struct virtqueue { unsigned int num_free; unsigned int num_max; void *priv; + bool reset; }; int virtqueue_add_outbuf(struct virtqueue *vq,