diff mbox series

[RFC,v2,03/17] KVM: selftest: Adding TDX life cycle test.

Message ID 20220830222000.709028-4-sagis@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series TDX KVM selftests | expand

Commit Message

Sagi Shahar Aug. 30, 2022, 10:19 p.m. UTC
From: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>

Adding a test to verify TDX lifecycle by creating a TD and running a
dummy TDVMCALL<INSTRUCTION.IO> inside it.

Signed-off-by: Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Afranji <afranji@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h  | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c       | 104 ++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 254 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c

Comments

Isaku Yamahata Sept. 1, 2022, 12:46 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 10:19:46PM +0000,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@google.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> index 61b997dfc420..d5de52657112 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,12 @@
>  #define _PAGE_RW            (1UL<<1)       /* writeable */
>  #define _PAGE_PS            (1UL<<7)       /* page size bit*/
>  
> +#define TDX_INSTRUCTION_IO 30
> +
> +#define TDX_SUCCESS_PORT 0x30
> +#define TDX_IO_READ 0
> +#define TDX_IO_WRITE 1
> +
>  #define GDT_ENTRY(flags, base, limit)				\
>  		((((base)  & 0xff000000ULL) << (56-24)) |	\
>  		 (((flags) & 0x0000f0ffULL) << 40) |		\
> @@ -83,4 +89,147 @@ void prepare_source_image(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *guest_code,
>  			  size_t guest_code_size,
>  			  uint64_t guest_code_signature);
>  
> +/*
> + * Generic TDCALL function that can be used to communicate with TDX module or
> + * VMM.
> + * Input operands: rax, rbx, rcx, rdx, r8-r15, rbp, rsi, rdi
> + * Output operands: rax, r8-r15, rbx, rdx, rdi, rsi
> + * rcx is actually a bitmap to tell TDX module which register values will be
> + * exposed to the VMM.
> + * XMM0-XMM15 registers can be used as input operands but the current
> + * implementation does not support it yet.
> + */
> +static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	asm volatile (
> +			"mov %13, %%rax;\n\t"
> +			"mov %14, %%rbx;\n\t"
> +			"mov %15, %%rcx;\n\t"
> +			"mov %16, %%rdx;\n\t"
> +			"mov %17, %%r8;\n\t"
> +			"mov %18, %%r9;\n\t"
> +			"mov %19, %%r10;\n\t"
> +			"mov %20, %%r11;\n\t"
> +			"mov %21, %%r12;\n\t"
> +			"mov %22, %%r13;\n\t"
> +			"mov %23, %%r14;\n\t"
> +			"mov %24, %%r15;\n\t"
> +			"mov %25, %%rbp;\n\t"
> +			"mov %26, %%rsi;\n\t"
> +			"mov %27, %%rdi;\n\t"
> +			".byte 0x66, 0x0F, 0x01, 0xCC;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%rax, %0;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%rbx, %1;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%rdx, %2;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r8, %3;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r9, %4;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r10, %5;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r11, %6;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r12, %7;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r13, %8;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r14, %9;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%r15, %10;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%rsi, %11;\n\t"
> +			"mov %%rdi, %12;\n\t"
> +			: "=m" (regs->rax), "=m" (regs->rbx), "=m" (regs->rdx),
> +			"=m" (regs->r8), "=m" (regs->r9), "=m" (regs->r10),
> +			"=m" (regs->r11), "=m" (regs->r12), "=m" (regs->r13),
> +			"=m" (regs->r14), "=m" (regs->r15), "=m" (regs->rsi),
> +			"=m" (regs->rdi)
> +			: "m" (regs->rax), "m" (regs->rbx), "m" (regs->rcx),
> +			"m" (regs->rdx), "m" (regs->r8), "m" (regs->r9),
> +			"m" (regs->r10), "m" (regs->r11), "m" (regs->r12),
> +			"m" (regs->r13), "m" (regs->r14), "m" (regs->r15),
> +			"m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi)
> +			: "rax", "rbx", "rcx", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",
> +			"r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rbp", "rsi", "rdi");
> +}

Sometimes compiler (my gcc is (Ubuntu 11.1.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 11.1.0) doesn't like
clobering the frame pointer as follows. (I edited the caller site for other test.)

   x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c:343:1: error: bp cannot be used in ‘asm’ here

I ended up the following workaround.  I didn't use pushq/popq pair because
I didn't want to play with offset in the stack of the caller.


diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
index aa6961c6f304..8ddf3b64f003 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
@@ -122,7 +122,11 @@ void prepare_source_image(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *guest_code,
  */
 static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
 {
+       unsigned long saved_rbp = 0;
+
        asm volatile (
+               /* gcc complains that frame pointer %rbp can't be clobbered. */
+                       "movq %%rbp, %28;\n\t"
                        "mov %13, %%rax;\n\t"
                        "mov %14, %%rbx;\n\t"
                        "mov %15, %%rcx;\n\t"
@@ -152,6 +156,8 @@ static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
                        "mov %%r15, %10;\n\t"
                        "mov %%rsi, %11;\n\t"
                        "mov %%rdi, %12;\n\t"
+                       "movq %28, %%rbp\n\t"
+                       "movq $0, %28\n\t"
                        : "=m" (regs->rax), "=m" (regs->rbx), "=m" (regs->rdx),
                        "=m" (regs->r8), "=m" (regs->r9), "=m" (regs->r10),
                        "=m" (regs->r11), "=m" (regs->r12), "=m" (regs->r13),
@@ -161,9 +167,10 @@ static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
                        "m" (regs->rdx), "m" (regs->r8), "m" (regs->r9),
                        "m" (regs->r10), "m" (regs->r11), "m" (regs->r12),
                        "m" (regs->r13), "m" (regs->r14), "m" (regs->r15),
-                       "m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi)
+                       "m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi),
+                       "m" (saved_rbp)
                        : "rax", "rbx", "rcx", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",
-                       "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rbp", "rsi", "rdi");
+                         "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rsi", "rdi");
 }
Sean Christopherson Sept. 1, 2022, 2:37 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> Sometimes compiler (my gcc is (Ubuntu 11.1.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) 11.1.0) doesn't like
> clobering the frame pointer as follows. (I edited the caller site for other test.)
> 
>    x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c:343:1: error: bp cannot be used in ‘asm’ here
> 
> I ended up the following workaround.  I didn't use pushq/popq pair because
> I didn't want to play with offset in the stack of the caller.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> index aa6961c6f304..8ddf3b64f003 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,11 @@ void prepare_source_image(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *guest_code,
>   */
>  static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
>  {
> +       unsigned long saved_rbp = 0;
> +
>         asm volatile (
> +               /* gcc complains that frame pointer %rbp can't be clobbered. */
> +                       "movq %%rbp, %28;\n\t"
>                         "mov %13, %%rax;\n\t"
>                         "mov %14, %%rbx;\n\t"
>                         "mov %15, %%rcx;\n\t"
> @@ -152,6 +156,8 @@ static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
>                         "mov %%r15, %10;\n\t"
>                         "mov %%rsi, %11;\n\t"
>                         "mov %%rdi, %12;\n\t"
> +                       "movq %28, %%rbp\n\t"
> +                       "movq $0, %28\n\t"
>                         : "=m" (regs->rax), "=m" (regs->rbx), "=m" (regs->rdx),
>                         "=m" (regs->r8), "=m" (regs->r9), "=m" (regs->r10),
>                         "=m" (regs->r11), "=m" (regs->r12), "=m" (regs->r13),
> @@ -161,9 +167,10 @@ static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
>                         "m" (regs->rdx), "m" (regs->r8), "m" (regs->r9),
>                         "m" (regs->r10), "m" (regs->r11), "m" (regs->r12),
>                         "m" (regs->r13), "m" (regs->r14), "m" (regs->r15),
> -                       "m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi)
> +                       "m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi),
> +                       "m" (saved_rbp)
>                         : "rax", "rbx", "rcx", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",
> -                       "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rbp", "rsi", "rdi");
> +                         "r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rsi", "rdi");
>  }

Inline assembly for TDCALL is going to be a mess.  Assuming proper assembly doesn't
Just Work for selftests, we should solve that problem and build this on top.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index ad4d60dadc06..208e0cc30048 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += set_memory_region_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += steal_time
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += kvm_binary_stats_test
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += system_counter_offset_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/tdx_vm_tests
 
 # Compiled outputs used by test targets
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED_x86_64 += x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
index 61b997dfc420..d5de52657112 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86_64/tdx.h
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ 
 #define _PAGE_RW            (1UL<<1)       /* writeable */
 #define _PAGE_PS            (1UL<<7)       /* page size bit*/
 
+#define TDX_INSTRUCTION_IO 30
+
+#define TDX_SUCCESS_PORT 0x30
+#define TDX_IO_READ 0
+#define TDX_IO_WRITE 1
+
 #define GDT_ENTRY(flags, base, limit)				\
 		((((base)  & 0xff000000ULL) << (56-24)) |	\
 		 (((flags) & 0x0000f0ffULL) << 40) |		\
@@ -83,4 +89,147 @@  void prepare_source_image(struct kvm_vm *vm, void *guest_code,
 			  size_t guest_code_size,
 			  uint64_t guest_code_signature);
 
+/*
+ * Generic TDCALL function that can be used to communicate with TDX module or
+ * VMM.
+ * Input operands: rax, rbx, rcx, rdx, r8-r15, rbp, rsi, rdi
+ * Output operands: rax, r8-r15, rbx, rdx, rdi, rsi
+ * rcx is actually a bitmap to tell TDX module which register values will be
+ * exposed to the VMM.
+ * XMM0-XMM15 registers can be used as input operands but the current
+ * implementation does not support it yet.
+ */
+static inline void tdcall(struct kvm_regs *regs)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+			"mov %13, %%rax;\n\t"
+			"mov %14, %%rbx;\n\t"
+			"mov %15, %%rcx;\n\t"
+			"mov %16, %%rdx;\n\t"
+			"mov %17, %%r8;\n\t"
+			"mov %18, %%r9;\n\t"
+			"mov %19, %%r10;\n\t"
+			"mov %20, %%r11;\n\t"
+			"mov %21, %%r12;\n\t"
+			"mov %22, %%r13;\n\t"
+			"mov %23, %%r14;\n\t"
+			"mov %24, %%r15;\n\t"
+			"mov %25, %%rbp;\n\t"
+			"mov %26, %%rsi;\n\t"
+			"mov %27, %%rdi;\n\t"
+			".byte 0x66, 0x0F, 0x01, 0xCC;\n\t"
+			"mov %%rax, %0;\n\t"
+			"mov %%rbx, %1;\n\t"
+			"mov %%rdx, %2;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r8, %3;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r9, %4;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r10, %5;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r11, %6;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r12, %7;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r13, %8;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r14, %9;\n\t"
+			"mov %%r15, %10;\n\t"
+			"mov %%rsi, %11;\n\t"
+			"mov %%rdi, %12;\n\t"
+			: "=m" (regs->rax), "=m" (regs->rbx), "=m" (regs->rdx),
+			"=m" (regs->r8), "=m" (regs->r9), "=m" (regs->r10),
+			"=m" (regs->r11), "=m" (regs->r12), "=m" (regs->r13),
+			"=m" (regs->r14), "=m" (regs->r15), "=m" (regs->rsi),
+			"=m" (regs->rdi)
+			: "m" (regs->rax), "m" (regs->rbx), "m" (regs->rcx),
+			"m" (regs->rdx), "m" (regs->r8), "m" (regs->r9),
+			"m" (regs->r10), "m" (regs->r11), "m" (regs->r12),
+			"m" (regs->r13), "m" (regs->r14), "m" (regs->r15),
+			"m" (regs->rbp), "m" (regs->rsi), "m" (regs->rdi)
+			: "rax", "rbx", "rcx", "rdx", "r8", "r9", "r10", "r11",
+			"r12", "r13", "r14", "r15", "rbp", "rsi", "rdi");
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Do a TDVMCALL IO request
+ *
+ * Input Args:
+ *  port - IO port to do read/write
+ *  size - Number of bytes to read/write. 1=1byte, 2=2bytes, 4=4bytes.
+ *  write - 1=IO write 0=IO read
+ *  data - pointer for the data to write
+ *
+ * Output Args:
+ *  data - pointer for data to be read
+ *
+ * Return:
+ *   On success, return 0. For Invalid-IO-Port error, returns -1.
+ *
+ * Does an IO operation using the following tdvmcall interface.
+ *
+ * TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.IO>-Input Operands
+ * R11 30 for IO
+ *
+ * R12 Size of access. 1=1byte, 2=2bytes, 4=4bytes.
+ * R13 Direction. 0=Read, 1=Write.
+ * R14 Port number
+ * R15 Data to write, if R13 is 1.
+ *
+ * TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.IO>-Output Operands
+ * R10 TDG.VP.VMCALL-return code.
+ * R11 Data to read, if R13 is 0.
+ *
+ * TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.IO>-Status Codes
+ * Error Code Value Description
+ * TDG.VP.VMCALL_SUCCESS 0x0 TDG.VP.VMCALL is successful
+ * TDG.VP.VMCALL_INVALID_OPERAND 0x80000000 00000000 Invalid-IO-Port access
+ */
+static inline uint64_t tdvmcall_io(uint64_t port, uint64_t size,
+				   uint64_t write, uint64_t *data)
+{
+	struct kvm_regs regs;
+
+	memset(&regs, 0, sizeof(regs));
+	regs.r11 = TDX_INSTRUCTION_IO;
+	regs.r12 = size;
+	regs.r13 = write;
+	regs.r14 = port;
+	if (write) {
+		regs.r15 = *data;
+		regs.rcx = 0xFC00;
+	} else {
+		regs.rcx = 0x7C00;
+	}
+	tdcall(&regs);
+	if (!write)
+		*data = regs.r11;
+	return regs.r10;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Report test success to user space.
+ */
+static inline void tdvmcall_success(void)
+{
+	uint64_t code = 0;
+
+	tdvmcall_io(TDX_SUCCESS_PORT, /*size=*/4, TDX_IO_WRITE, &code);
+}
+
+
+#define TDX_FUNCTION_SIZE(name) ((uint64_t)&__stop_sec_ ## name -\
+			   (uint64_t)&__start_sec_ ## name) \
+
+#define TDX_GUEST_FUNCTION__(name, section_name) \
+extern char *__start_sec_ ## name ; \
+extern char *__stop_sec_ ## name ; \
+static void \
+__attribute__((__flatten__, section(section_name))) name(void *arg)
+
+
+#define STRINGIFY2(x) #x
+#define STRINGIFY(x) STRINGIFY2(x)
+#define CONCAT2(a, b) a##b
+#define CONCAT(a, b) CONCAT2(a, b)
+
+
+#define TDX_GUEST_FUNCTION(name) \
+TDX_GUEST_FUNCTION__(name, STRINGIFY(CONCAT(sec_, name)))
+
 #endif  // KVM_LIB_TDX_H_
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..590e45aa7570
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/tdx_vm_tests.c
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include "../lib/x86_64/tdx.h"
+#include <linux/kvm.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include <time.h>
+#include <sys/mman.h>
+#include<sys/wait.h>
+
+#define CHECK_GUEST_COMPLETION(VCPU)								\
+	(TEST_ASSERT(										\
+		((VCPU)->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_IO) &&					\
+		((VCPU)->run->io.port == TDX_SUCCESS_PORT) &&					\
+		((VCPU)->run->io.size == 4) &&							\
+		((VCPU)->run->io.direction == TDX_IO_WRITE),					\
+		"Unexpected exit values while waiting for test complition: %u (%s) %d %d %d\n",	\
+		(VCPU)->run->exit_reason, exit_reason_str((VCPU)->run->exit_reason),		\
+		(VCPU)->run->io.port, (VCPU)->run->io.size, (VCPU)->run->io.direction))
+
+/*
+ * There might be multiple tests we are running and if one test fails, it will
+ * prevent the subsequent tests to run due to how tests are failing with
+ * TEST_ASSERT function. The run_in_new_process function will run a test in a
+ * new process context and wait for it to finish or fail to prevent TEST_ASSERT
+ * to kill the main testing process.
+ */
+void run_in_new_process(void (*func)(void))
+{
+	if (fork() == 0) {
+		func();
+		exit(0);
+	}
+	wait(NULL);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Verify that the TDX  is supported by the KVM.
+ */
+bool is_tdx_enabled(void)
+{
+	return !!(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(KVM_X86_TDX_VM));
+}
+
+/*
+ * Do a dummy io exit to verify that the TD has been initialized correctly and
+ * guest can run some code inside.
+ */
+TDX_GUEST_FUNCTION(guest_dummy_exit)
+{
+	tdvmcall_success();
+}
+
+/*
+ * TD lifecycle test will create a TD which runs a dumy IO exit to verify that
+ * the guest TD has been created correctly.
+ */
+void verify_td_lifecycle(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+	printf("Verifying TD lifecycle:\n");
+	/* Create a TD VM with no memory.*/
+	vm = vm_create_tdx();
+
+	/* Allocate TD guest memory and initialize the TD.*/
+	initialize_td(vm);
+
+	/* Initialize the TD vcpu and copy the test code to the guest memory.*/
+	vcpu = vm_vcpu_add_tdx(vm, 0);
+
+	/* Setup and initialize VM memory */
+	prepare_source_image(vm, guest_dummy_exit,
+			     TDX_FUNCTION_SIZE(guest_dummy_exit), 0);
+	finalize_td_memory(vm);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	CHECK_GUEST_COMPLETION(vcpu);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+	printf("\t ... PASSED\n");
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	if (!is_tdx_enabled()) {
+		print_skip("TDX is not supported by the KVM");
+		exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+	}
+
+	run_in_new_process(&verify_td_lifecycle);
+
+	return 0;
+}