@@ -221,14 +221,15 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *alloc_pmu_event_filter(uint32_t nevents)
static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *
-create_pmu_event_filter(const uint64_t event_list[],
- int nevents, uint32_t action)
+create_pmu_event_filter(const uint64_t event_list[], int nevents,
+ uint32_t action, uint32_t flags)
{
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f;
int i;
f = alloc_pmu_event_filter(nevents);
f->action = action;
+ f->flags = flags;
for (i = 0; i < nevents; i++)
f->events[i] = event_list[i];
@@ -239,7 +240,7 @@ static struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *event_filter(uint32_t action)
{
return create_pmu_event_filter(event_list,
ARRAY_SIZE(event_list),
- action);
+ action, 0);
}
/*
@@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ static void test_amd_deny_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
struct kvm_pmu_event_filter *f;
uint64_t count;
- f = create_pmu_event_filter(&event, 1, KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY);
+ f = create_pmu_event_filter(&event, 1, KVM_PMU_EVENT_DENY, 0);
count = test_with_filter(vcpu, f);
free(f);
Now that the flags field can be non-zero, pass it in when creating a pmu event filter. This is needed in preparation for testing masked events. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com> --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)